Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer

Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer
Argued 2 April, 2014
Decided 25 June, 2014
Full case name Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer
Docket nos. 12-751
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
Majority Breyer, joined by unanimous

Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 573 U.S. ___ (2014) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court found ESOP fiduciaries have the same prudential duties as non-ESOP fiduciaries, as set by ERISA, except that they are not required to diversify their investments beyond shares of the employer's stock.[1][2]

References

  1. ↑ "Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer". Oyez. 30 September 2017. Retrieved 30 September 2017.
  2. ↑ "Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer". SCOTUS Blog. Retrieved 30 September 2017.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.