The Human Surge

The Human Surge
Promotional poster for The Human Surge
Spanish El auge del humano
Directed by Eduardo Williams
Produced by
  • Violeta Bava
  • Rosa Martinez Rivero
  • Jerónimo Quevedo[1]
Starring
  • Sergio Morosini
  • Chai Fonacier
  • Domingos Marengula
  • Rixel Manimtim
  • Manuel Asucan
  • Irene Doliente Paña
  • Shine Marx[1]
Cinematography
  • Eduardo Williams
  • Joaquín Neira
  • Julien Guillery[1]
Edited by
  • Eduardo Williams
  • Alice Furtado[1]
Production
companies
  • Bando À Parte
  • Ruda Cine
  • Un puma
  • RT Features[1]
Distributed by Ruda Cine[1]
Release date
  • August 8, 2016 (2016-08-08) (Locarno)
Running time
 97 minutes[2]
Country
  • Argentina
  • Brazil
  • Portugal[3]
Language

The Human Surge (Spanish: El auge del humano) is a 2016 experimental film directed, written, photographed and edited by the Argentine director Eduardo Williams. It is Williams' first feature film, after a number of shorts. The Human Surge is structured into three separate narrative and geographical segments: one in Buenos Aires, the second in Maputo, Mozambique, and the third in Bohol, Philippines.

Each narrative segment follows a handful of characters, who are often seen loitering or moving between spaces, such as workplace and home. The segments are linked with diegetic bridges. Williams has stated that he wanted to explore the sensation and feelings related to aimlessness and travel, and thereby "create a rhythm between excitement and boredom or surprise and depression."[4] The characters depicted in the three segments are invariably poor, restless and on the search for connection with other human beings.

The film premiered at the Locarno Film Festival in 2016, where it won the Concorso Cineasti del Presente (Filmmakers of the Present). It was subsequently released at film festivals in Toronto and New York to critical acclaim. Comparisons have been made to other filmmakers working in the slow cinema subgenre, where emphasis is made on the durational aspect of film, rather than its narrative qualities.

Synopsis

In Buenos Aires, the 25-year-old Exe is seen waking up and getting dressed in his apartment. He wades through a flooded neighbourhood to arrive at his workplace, a supermarket, only to be fired from his position. He subsequently spends time with his friends and family, loitering with the former in urban spaces and visiting online sex chat rooms. They perform sex acts, like fellatio, on each other in front of a web camera for virtual payment.

The movie moves on to the next segment through the window of a Chaturbate website, in which a group of African teenagers in Maputo, Mozambique are also seen engaging in cybersex for money. The Mozambique characters are also unemployed and empoverished, and perambulate through the streets between odd jobs and social events.

One character is found urinating on an anthill, which functions as a diegetic segue to the film's third segment, when the camera follows ants moving into the earth, before finally arriving at a hand holding a smartphone in a jungle somewhere in the Philippines. The film subsequently follows a couple of characters bathing together and walking through the jungle, in particular one woman looking to charge her cellphone. Finally, the film moves into a technological factory in Bohol, where tablet computers are made on an assembly line. The last words are spoken by a machine, repeatedly saying "Okay."

Production

Williams had made six short films before his feature debut The Human Surge, in which he had experimented with different video formats and textures.[5] In the short films Pude ver in Puma (eng. Could See a Puma, 2011)[6] and Tôi quên rôi! (eng. I forgot!, 2014), he and his usual cinematographers Joaquin Neira and Julien Guillery experimented with various aesthetic strategies—notably the use of long, handheld tracking shots (often described as "floating" and "restless"[7][8]), amateur photography, as well as elliptical storytelling—which they also used in The Human Surge.[7]

For The Human Surge, Williams used three different video formats, one for each segment: the Argentine segment was shot on 16 mm film, the Mozambique part with a Blackmagic pocket camera—subsequently recaptured in Super 16 from a computer monitor, and the final Philippine sequence on a digital RED camera.[9][10] In the Mozambique segment, Williams operated the camera himself, considering it "so small," whereas in the two other segments he was helped by several assistents.[11]

In his first short films, Williams had regularly employed a domestic Argentine setting. However, in the latest shorts—That I'm Falling? (2013) and I forgot! (2014)—he opted for different locales, Sierra Leone and Vietnam, respectively. Having travelled abroad only very rarely as a young man, Williams was struck by the beauty of foreign languages, and wanted to use them in a filmic context. He eventually also discovering a charm in his vernacular, spoken Spanish.[5]

Analysis

The film has been analysed for its commonalities with other entries in Williams' oeuvre, most notably the themes of alienation in the internet age, and how modern technology creates distance between people.[9]

"My brain and practice have been transformed by technology. For example, by the video games that I played when I was young. In video games, you have these different levels that you advance to, moving through multiple spaces. And then the chats—at many points in my life, it seemed like online chatting was my only means of communication. It is a different way of speaking, of connecting. I didn’t think of it at first, but this is why I structure my films the way I do. It’s about how I see and relate to the world."

—Eduardo Williams, 2016.[7]

Picking up on the theme of internet psychology, critic Nick Pinkerton praises Williams' ability in addressing "the enormous cognitive earthquake represented by the internet’s colonization of daily life".[7]

Several critics have found certain organizational elements within the film and, by extension, Williams' oeuvre. Leo Goldsmith of Cinema Scope has called Williams' work a "cinema of vectors", noting the constant geographical and ontological displacement throughout his films.[8] Ambulatory passages are frequent in Williams' cinema, where (often young) characters are seen moving through dilapidated apartments, supermarkets, areas of urban decay, jungles, rocky hillsides and caves.[11] The novelty in The Human Surge lies in its movement from literal/concrete places (anthill) to abstract/figurative places (internet).[11]

In the final segment, Williams wanted to address the "illusion of escape", by moving to the natural, verdant greens of the Filipino jungle, only to pull back into a machine-filled factory, which he found to be a "very strange" and "very digital place".[12]

Serbo-Croatian filmmaker Iva Radivojevic compared Williams' film to Lucrecia Martel's La Ciénaga (2001, eng. 'The Swamp'). Beyond both being feature debuts from Argentinian filmmakers, Radivojevic found The Human Surge to be starting "in a kind of swamp" and sharing a "mystical quality" with Martel's film, causing the spectator to be "injected into a kind of vacuum of time".[13]

Reception

The Human Surge premiered at the Locarno Film Festival to critical acclaim. It won the main prize in the section "Filmmakers of the Present" at the festival, the jury of which included Italian horror director Dario Argento.[7][8][14]

When the movie was shown at the Maryland Film Festival, programmer Eric Allen Hatch invoked the concept of slow cinema, citing filmmakers such as Andrei Tarkovsky, Lisandro Alonso, Harmony Korine and Gus van Sant, who also take advantage of the durational aspect of the moving image.[15] In an interview with the director for Filmmaker Magazine, critic Vadim Rizov picked up on that theme, regarding Hungarian filmmaker Béla Tarr as an important influence on the film's long tracking shots following characters moving through space. He also mentioned van Sant, finding the handheld camera to be suggestive of "the physical foot leather fueling the camerawork."[11]

Some critics were less enthusiastic about the film. Matt Fagerholm gave it 1 out of 4 stars in a pan review for RogerEbert.com, considering Williams' feature "admirable on a conceptual level", yet its execution to be "incoherent, interminable and a colossal strain on the eyes." He compared it unfavorably to the visually similar Enter the Void (2009) by French-Argentine director Gaspar Noé, noting the aesthetic strategy of following "characters from a distance, surveying the back of their heads". Fagerholm was in general not impressed by the images Williams had captured, calling them "murky," and "just plain awful." He concluded the review by stating that "[he] hated “The Human Surge,” but [he] do not hate its creator."[16] Carson Lund of Slant Magazine was also critical of the feature, considering it to be easily mistaken for "a particularly interminable YouTube video".[17]

The film was listed on several best-of-the-year lists for both 2016 and 2017, due to different release dates.[18] It was considered the second best film of 2017 by the online film magazine Reverse Shot, a publication of the Museum of the Moving Image in New York. Editor Jeff Reichert noted its "shape-shifting" qualities and compared it to the works of Thai directors Apichatpong Weerasethakul and Anocha Suwichakornpong (the latter's By the Time It Gets Dark was listed as number 8 on the same list), which he lauded for "allowing themselves to do whatever, whenever they please." He concluded his entry by calling The Human Surge "the most laid-back movie of grand ambition to come along in some time."[19]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "The Human Surge," Cineuropa, accessed August 14, 2017.
  2. ↑ Glenn Kenny, "Review: Pursuing (Cyber) Connections in ‘The Human Surge’," The New York Times, March 2, 2017.
  3. 1 2 "Eduardo Williams: The Human Surge", Tate Modern, February 24, 2017.
  4. ↑ Gustavo Beck, "Embracing Uncertainty: An Interview with Eduardo Williams," MUBI, August 8, 2016.
  5. 1 2 Ela Bittencourt, "Interview: Eduardo Williams," Film Comment, October 5, 2016.
  6. ↑ Pude ver un Puma, Universidad del Cine (Vimeo), accessed August 14, 2017.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Nick Pinkerton, "Mountain Out of an Anthill," Artforum, February 3, 2017.
  8. 1 2 3 Leo Goldsmith, "The Wanderer: Eduardo Williams’ The Human Surge," Cinema Scope 68, TIFF 2016.
  9. 1 2 Andréa Picard, "Aboard the Human Express," Metrograph, March 1, 2017.
  10. ↑ Mark Peranson, "The Human Surge," Locarno Festival in Los Angeles, accessed August 14, 2017.
    ———. "El auge del humano," PardoLive, August 8, 2016.
    ———. "Cinema Scope 68 Editor’s Note," Cinema Scope 68, 2016.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Vadim Rizov, "The Art of Walking: Eduardo Williams on The Human Surge," Filmmaker Magazine, January 18, 2017.
  12. ↑ P. M. Cicchetti, "An Interview with The Human Surge’s Eduardo Williams," Reverse Shot (Museum of the Moving Image), March 2, 2017.
  13. ↑ "Notebook's 9th Writers Poll: Fantasy Double Features of 2016," MUBI, December 28, 2016.
  14. ↑ Zach Lewis, "#NYFF 2016: The Human Surge," Brooklyn Magazine, October 5, 2016.
  15. ↑ Eric Allen Hatch, "The Human Surge," Maryland Film Festival, accessed August 14, 2017.
  16. ↑ Matt Fagerholm, "The Human Surge Movie Review & Film Summary (2017)," RogerEbert.com, March 3, 2017.
  17. ↑ Carson Lund, "The Human Surge," Slant Magazine, February 24, 2017.
  18. ↑ "World Poll 2016 – Part 1," Senses of Cinema 81, January 2017.
  19. ↑ "Reverse Shot’s Best of 2017," Reverse Shot, January 1, 2018.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.