Born rule

The Born rule (also called the Born law, Born's rule, or Born's law) formulated by German physicist Max Born in 1926, is a law of quantum mechanics giving the probability that a measurement on a quantum system will yield a given result.^[1] In its simplest form it states that the probability density of finding the particle at a given point is proportional to the square of the magnitude of the particle's wavefunction at that point. The Born rule is one of the key principles of quantum mechanics. There have been many attempts to derive the Born rule from the other assumptions of quantum mechanics ; see Geometry of Quantum Theory, by V.S. Varadarajan for a rigorous derivation.

Schrödinger equation

The rule

The Born rule states that if an observable corresponding to a Hermitian operator $A$ with discrete spectrum is measured in a system with normalized wave function $|\psi \rangle$ (see bra–ket notation), then

the measured result will be one of the eigenvalues $\lambda$ of $A$ , and
the probability of measuring a given eigenvalue $\lambda _{i}$ will equal $\langle \psi |P_{i}|\psi \rangle$ , where $P_{i}$ is the projection onto the eigenspace of $A$ corresponding to $\lambda _{i}$ .

(In the case where the eigenspace of

A

corresponding to

\lambda _{i}

is one-dimensional and spanned by the normalized eigenvector

|\lambda _{i}\rangle

,

P_{i}

is equal to

|\lambda _{i}\rangle \langle \lambda _{i}|

, so the probability

\langle \psi |P_{i}|\psi \rangle

is equal to

\langle \psi |\lambda _{i}\rangle \langle \lambda _{i}|\psi \rangle

. Since the complex number

\langle \lambda _{i}|\psi \rangle

is known as the probability amplitude that the state vector

|\psi \rangle

assigns to the eigenvector

|\lambda _{i}\rangle

, it is common to describe the Born rule as telling us that probability is equal to the amplitude-squared (really the amplitude times its own complex conjugate). Equivalently, the probability can be written as

|\langle \lambda _{i}|\psi \rangle |^{2}

.)

In the case where the spectrum of $A$ is not wholly discrete, the spectral theorem proves the existence of a certain projection-valued measure $Q$ , the spectral measure of $A$ . In this case,

the probability that the result of the measurement lies in a measurable set $M$ will be given by $\langle \psi |Q(M)|\psi \rangle$ .

If we are given a wave function $\psi$ for a single structureless particle in position space, this reduces to saying that the probability density function $p(x,y,z)$ for a measurement of the position at time $t_{0}$ will be given by

p(x,y,z)=

|\psi (x,y,z,t_{0})|^{2}.

History

The Born rule was formulated by Born in a 1926 paper.^[2] In this paper, Born solves the Schrödinger equation for a scattering problem and, inspired by Einstein's work on the photoelectric effect,^[3] concludes, in a footnote, that the Born rule gives the only possible interpretation of the solution. In 1954, together with Walther Bothe, Born was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for this and other work.^[3] John von Neumann discussed the application of spectral theory to Born's rule in his 1932 book.^[4]

Interpretations

Within the Quantum Bayesianism interpretation of quantum theory, the Born rule is seen as an extension of the standard Law of Total Probability, which takes into account the Hilbert space dimension of the physical system involved.^[5] In the ambit of the so-called Hidden-Measurements Interpretation of quantum mechanics the Born rule can be derived by averaging over all possible measurement-interactions that can take place between the quantum entity and the measuring system. ^[6]^[7] It has been claimed that Pilot Wave Theory can also statistically derive Born's law. ^[8] While it has been claimed that Born's law can be derived from the Many Worlds Interpretation, the existing proofs have been criticized as circular.^[9] Kastner^[10] claims that the transactional interpretation is unique in giving a physical explanation for the Born rule.

References

↑ The time evolution of a quantum system is entirely deterministic according to the Schrödinger equation. It is through the Born Rule that probability enters into the theory.
↑ Born, Max (1926). "I.2". In Wheeler, J. A.; Zurek, W. H. Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge [On the quantum mechanics of collisions]. Princeton University Press (published 1983). pp. 863–867. Bibcode:1926ZPhy...37..863B. doi:10.1007/BF01397477. ISBN 0-691-08316-9.
1 2 Born, Max (11 December 1954). "The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics" (PDF). www.nobelprize.org. nobelprize.org. Retrieved 30 December 2016. Again an idea of Einstein's gave me the lead. He had tried to make the duality of particles - light quanta or photons - and waves comprehensible by interpreting the square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurrence of photons. This concept could at once be carried over to the psi-function: |psi|² ought to represent the probability density for electrons (or other particles).
↑ Neumann (von), John (1932). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik [Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics]. Translated by Beyer, Robert T. Princeton University Press (published 1996). ISBN 0691028931.
↑ Christopher A. Fuchs. "QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism". arXiv:1003.5209.
↑ Aerts, D. (1986). A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 27, pp. 202-210.
↑ Aerts, D. and Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2014). The extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics and the hidden-measurement solution to the measurement problem. Annals of Physics 351, Pages 975–1025 (Open Access).
↑ http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~mdt26/PWT/lectures/bohm7.pdf
↑ N.P. Landsman, "The conclusion seems to be that no generally accepted derivation of the Born rule has been given to date, but this does not imply that such a derivation is impossible in principle.", in Compendium of Quantum Physics (eds.) F.Weinert, K. Hentschel, D.Greenberger and B. Falkenburg (Springer, 2008), ISBN 3-540-70622-4
↑ The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. R.E.Kastner. Cambridge University Press. 2013. ISBN 978-0-521-76415-5. P35

External links

Quantum Mechanics Not in Jeopardy: Physicists Confirm a Decades-Old Key Principle Experimentally ScienceDaily (July 23, 2010)

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] The time evolution of a quantum system is entirely deterministic according to the Schrödinger equation. It is through the Born Rule that probability enters into the theory.

[Zeitschrift-2] Born, Max (1926). "I.2". In Wheeler, J. A.; Zurek, W. H. Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge [On the quantum mechanics of collisions]. Princeton University Press (published 1983). pp. 863–867. Bibcode:1926ZPhy...37..863B. doi:10.1007/BF01397477. ISBN 0-691-08316-9.

[Nobel-3] 1 2 Born, Max (11 December 1954). "The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics" (PDF). www.nobelprize.org. nobelprize.org. Retrieved 30 December 2016. Again an idea of Einstein's gave me the lead. He had tried to make the duality of particles - light quanta or photons - and waves comprehensible by interpreting the square of the optical wave amplitudes as probability density for the occurrence of photons. This concept could at once be carried over to the psi-function: |psi|² ought to represent the probability density for electrons (or other particles).

[Grundlagen-4] Neumann (von), John (1932). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik [Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics]. Translated by Beyer, Robert T. Princeton University Press (published 1996). ISBN 0691028931.

[5] Christopher A. Fuchs. "QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism". arXiv:1003.5209.

[Aerts1986-6] Aerts, D. (1986). A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 27, pp. 202-210.

[AertsSassoli2014d-7] Aerts, D. and Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2014). The extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics and the hidden-measurement solution to the measurement problem. Annals of Physics 351, Pages 975–1025 (Open Access).

[8] ttp://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~mdt26/PWT/lectures/bohm7.pdf

[9] N.P. Landsman, "The conclusion seems to be that no generally accepted derivation of the Born rule has been given to date, but this does not imply that such a derivation is impossible in principle.", in Compendium of Quantum Physics (eds.) F.Weinert, K. Hentschel, D.Greenberger and B. Falkenburg (Springer, 2008), ISBN 3-540-70622-4

[10] The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. R.E.Kastner. Cambridge University Press. 2013. ISBN 978-0-521-76415-5. P35