Bo Muller-Moore

Robert "Bo" Muller-Moore[1] is a silk screen artist based in Montpelier, Vermont,[2][3] known for a legal dispute with fast food company Chick-fil-A.[4]

Background

Circa 2000, Muller-Moore, at the instigation of a kale-farming friend, created a design featuring the phrase "Eat More Kale", and started to print t-shirts bearing the design.[5]

In 2011, Muller-Moore's application for a federal trademark to protect the "Eat More Kale" design drew an objection from Chick-fil-A.[4] Chick-fil-A contended that the phrase infringed on its trademark, "Eat Mor Chikin,"[4] and ordered Muller-Moore to give his website to Chick-fil-A.[6]

Chick-fil-A's actions resulted in a Streisand effect.[7] Muller-Moore received national press coverage,[8] vocal support from the then-governor of Vermont, Peter Shumlin,[4] and a sharp upturn in t-shirt sales.[9] Chick-fil-A's actions were portrayed as corporate bullying.[10][11][12][13]

Documentary

Muller-Moore raised funds via Kickstarter to create a documentary film about his efforts, to be titled A Defiant Dude.[2] (As of early 2018, completion of the documentary is on hold pending resolution of remaining legal issues relating to the contested trademarks.[14])

In 2013, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a preliminary "no" verdict against Muller-Moore's trademark application,[15] resulting in speculation by trademark attorneys that Chick-fil-A's objections would prevail.[16] In 2014, the USPTO reversed its preliminary decision and ruled to give "Eat More Kale" trademark protection.[17][18][19][20]

Muller-Moore's response to Chick-fil-A's trademark infringement accusations is now referenced in several academic discussions of intellectual property law and business ethics.[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]

Similar case

Chick-fil-A's approach drew comparisons to a 2009 dispute in which representatives of the Monster Energy beverage brand attempted to prevent Vermont's Rock Art Brewery from marketing a beer called "Vermonster."[8] That dispute inspired a boycott of Monster drinks by one of Vermont's largest beverage outlets and legislation by Vermont's senators, Bernard Sanders and Patrick J. Leahy.[8] Rock Art Brewery was ultimately able to continue to market Vermonster.[8][3][6]

References

  1. Bobkoff, Dan (2013-09-05). "What Elevated Kale From Vegetable To Cultural Identifier?". NPR.
  2. 1 2 Doctorow, Cory (2012-03-25). "Chick-Fil-A threatens guy who made "Eat More Kale" shirts; he fights back with a Kickstarter documentary / Boing Boing". boingboing.net.
  3. 1 2 Ring, Wilson (28 November 2011). "Eat more kale: A David vs. Golaith fight with Chick-fil-A?" via Christian Science Monitor.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Carapezza, Kirk (2011-12-06). "Chicken Vs. Kale: Artist Fights Chick-Fil-A Suit". NPR.
  5. Shea, Courtney (2015-07-07). "How kale surpassed trend status to permanent superfood". The Star.
  6. 1 2 AP Nov. 28, 2011, 9:24 AM 451 (2011-11-28). "Chick-Fil-A Is Taking Legal Action Against This Vermont Artist For Selling Shirts That Say 'Eat More Kale'". Business Insider. Retrieved 2018-04-22.
  7. "World Trademark Review". www.worldtrademarkreview.com.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Bidgood, Jess (4 December 2011). "'Eat More Kale' T-Shirts Challenged by Chick-fil-A" via NYTimes.com.
  9. "Who Owns Kale?". National Geographic. 2016-09-28.
  10. "Vermont's 'Eat More Kale' guy wins trademark fight with Chick-fil-A". Chicago Tribune. 2014-12-12.
  11. "Shut your kale-hole". The Economist. 2012-03-24.
  12. Clauss, Kyle Scott (1 June 2015). "Facebook Wants a Vermont Startup to Drop 'Book' from Its Name". Boston Magazine.
  13. Bouchoux, Deborah E. (5 February 2017). "Aspen Handbook for Legal Writers: A Practical Reference". Wolters Kluwer Law & Business via Google Books.
  14. "Kale Documentary-in-progress". James Lantz.
  15. "Patent office protects Chick-fil-A's 'Eat mor chikin'". Wisconsin Gazette. 2013-04-23.
  16. Kim, Caroline (2013-04-25). "'Eat More Kale' Company Is Losing Against Chick-Fil-A in Trademark Battle". finance.yahoo.com.
  17. Lara, Georgieff (2014-12-16). "Chick-fil-A Loses Legal Battle to Block 'Eat More Kale' T-shirts". www.adweek.com.
  18. Atler, Charlotte (2014-12-12). "Vermont Man Wins Right to Use 'Eat More Kale' Slogan, Despite Chick-Fil-A Objections". Time.
  19. Ohlheiser, Abby (12 December 2014). "'Eat More Kale' Guy wins trademark battle with Chick-fil-A. Vermont rejoices, naturally" via www.washingtonpost.com.
  20. Pinkham, C.A. (2014-12-13). "Chick-Fil-A Loses Absurd Trademark Battle Against Tiny Vermont Company". kitchenette.jezebel.com.
  21. Port, Kenneth L. (2015). "Trademark Extortion Revisited: A Response to Vogel and Schachter". Mitchell Hamline Open Access.
  22. Orozco, David (Winter 2016). "Using Social Media in Business Disputes" (PDF). MIT Sloan Management Review. 57: 33–35.
  23. Kiser, Jessica M. (2013–2014). "To Bully or Not to Bully: Understanding the Role of Uncertainty in Trademark Enforcement Decisions". Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts via HeinOnline.
  24. Reese, R. Anthony (2012). "Copyright and Trademark Law and Public Interest Lawyering". UC Irvine Law Review. 2: 911–929.
  25. Vogel, Jason; Schachter, Jeremy A. "How Ethics Rules Can Be Used to Address Trademark Bullying" (PDF). The Trademark Reporter. 103: 503–518 via International Trademark Association.
  26. Dispoto, Anthony James (Spring 2015). "Protecting Small Businesses Against Trademark Bullying: Creating a Federal Law to Remove the Disparity of Leverage Trademark Holders Maintain Over Small Businesses". San Diego International Law Journal. 16 (2): 457–498.
  27. Nichols, Connie Davis (2014). "Trouble in Trademark Law: How Applying Different Theories Leaves Door Open for Abuse". Science and Technology Law Review. 17: 1–30.
  28. Greene, Timothy (Fall 2014). "Trademark Hybridity and Brand Protection". Loyola University Chicago Law Journal. 46 (1): 75–126.
  29. McCarthy, James M. (Winter 2014). "Build Your Brand Without Bullying" (PDF). Snippets. 12 (1): 1–3 via McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP.
  30. Bone, Robert G. "Notice Failure and Defenses in Trademark Law" (PDF). Boston University Law Review. 96: 1245–1292.
  31. Miller, Roger LeRoy (1 January 2014). "Business Law Today, Comprehensive: Text and Cases: Diverse, Ethical, Online, and Global Environment". Cengage Learning via Google Books.
  32. Sun, Haochen; Beebe, Barton Carl; Sunder, Madhavi (16 April 2018). "The Luxury Economy and Intellectual Property: Critical Reflections". Oxford University Press via Google Books.
  33. Twomey, David P.; Jennings, Marianne M.; Greene, Stephanie M. (1 January 2016). "Business Law: Principles for Today's Commercial Environment". Cengage Learning via Google Books.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.