Paleocene

The Paleocene, ( /ˈpæl.i.əˌsn, -i.-, ˈp.li-, -li.-/ PAL-ee-ə-seen, -ee-oh-, PAY-lee-, -lee-oh-)[2] or Palaeocene, is a geological epoch that lasted from about 66 to 56 million years ago (mya). It is the first epoch of the Paleogene Period in the modern Cenozoic Era. The name is a combination of the Ancient Greek palæo- meaning "old" and the Eocene Epoch (which succeeds the Paleocene), translating to "the old part of the Eocene".

System/
Period
Series/
Epoch
Stage/
Age
Age (Ma)
Neogene Miocene Aquitanian younger
Paleogene Oligocene Chattian 23.0 27.8
Rupelian 27.8 33.9
Eocene Priabonian 33.9 37.8
Bartonian 37.8 41.2
Lutetian 41.2 47.8
Ypresian 47.8 56.0
Paleocene Thanetian 56.0 59.2
Selandian 59.2 61.6
Danian 61.6 66.0
Cretaceous Upper/
Late
Maastrichtian older
Subdivision of the Paleogene Period
according to the ICS, as of 2019.[1]

The epoch is bracketed by two major events in Earth's history. The K–Pg extinction event, brought on by an asteroid impact and possibly volcanism, marked the beginning of the Paleocene and killed off 75% of living species, most famously the non-avian dinosaurs. The end of the epoch was marked by the Paleocene–Eocene thermal maximum (PETM), which was a major climatic event wherein about 2,500–4,500 gigatons of carbon were released into the atmosphere and ocean systems, causing a spike in global temperatures and ocean acidification.

In the Paleocene, the continents of the Northern Hemisphere were still connected via some land bridges; and South America, Antarctica, and Australia had not completely separated yet. The Rocky Mountains were being uplifted, the Americas had not yet joined, the Indian Plate had begun its collision with Asia, and the North Atlantic Igneous Province was forming in the third-largest magmatic event of the last 150 million years. In the oceans, the thermohaline circulation probably was much different than it is today, with downwellings occurring in the North Pacific rather than the North Atlantic, and water density mainly being controlled by salinity rather than temperature.

The K–Pg extinction event caused a floral and faunal turnover of species, with previously abundant species being replaced by previously uncommon ones. In the Paleocene, with a global average temperature of about 24–25 °C (75–77 °F), compared to 14 °C (57 °F) in more recent times, the Earth had a greenhouse climate without permanent ice sheets at the poles, like the preceding Mesozoic. As such, there were forests worldwide—including at the poles—but they had low species richness in regards to plant life, populated by mainly small creatures that were rapidly evolving to take advantage of the recently emptied Earth. Though some animals attained great size, most remained rather small. The forests grew quite dense in the general absence of large herbivores. Mammals proliferated in the Paleocene, and the earliest placental and marsupial mammals are recorded from this time, but most Paleocene taxa have ambiguous affinities. In the seas, ray-finned fish rose to dominate open ocean and reef ecosystems.

Etymology

Portrait of Wilhelm Philipp Schimper who coined the term "Paleocene"

The word "Paleocene" was first used by French paleobotanist and geologist Wilhelm Philipp Schimper in 1874 while describing deposits near Paris (spelled "Paléocène" in his treatise).[3][4] By this time, Italian geologist Giovanni Arduino had divided the history of life on Earth into the Primary (Paleozoic), Secondary (Mesozoic), and Tertiary in 1759; French geologist Jules Desnoyers had proposed splitting off the Quaternary from the Tertiary in 1829;[5] and Scottish geologist Charles Lyell (ignoring the Quaternary) had divided the Tertiary epoch into the Eocene, Miocene, Pliocene, and New Pliocene (Holocene) periods in 1833.[6][n 1] British geologist John Phillips had proposed the Cenozoic in 1840 in place of the Tertiary,[7] and Austrian paleontologist Moritz Hörnes had introduced the Paleogene for the Eocene and Neogene for the Miocene and Pliocene in 1853.[8] After decades of inconsistent usage, the newly formed International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS), in 1969, standardized stratigraphy based on the prevailing opinions in Europe: the Cenozoic Era subdivided into the Tertiary and Quaternary sub-eras, and the Tertiary subdivided into the Paleogene and Neogene periods.[9] In 1978, the Paleogene was officially defined as the Paleocene, Eocene, and Oligocene epochs; and the Neogene as the Miocene and Pliocene epochs.[10] In 1989, Tertiary and Quaternary were removed from the time scale due to the arbitrary nature of their boundary, but Quaternary was reinstated in 2009, which may lead to the reinstatement of the Tertiary in the future.[11]

The term "Eocene" is derived from Ancient Greek eo—eos ἠώς meaning "dawn", and—cene kainos καινός meaning "new" or "recent", as the epoch saw the dawn of recent, or modern, life. The term "Paleocene" is a portmanteau combination of the Ancient Greek palæo- palaios παλαιός meaning "old", and the word "Eocene", and so means "the old part of the Eocene". The term did not come into broad usage until around 1920. In North America and mainland Europe, the standard spelling is "Paleocene", whereas it is "Palaeocene" in the UK. Geologist T. C. R. Pulvertaft has argued that the latter spelling is incorrect because this would imply either a translation of "old recent" or a derivation from "pala" and "Eocene", which would be incorrect because the prefix palæo- uses the ligature æ instead of "a" and "e" individually, so only both characters or neither should be dropped, not just one.[4]

Geology

Boundaries

K–Pg boundary recorded in a Wyoming rock (the white stripe in the middle)

The Paleocene epoch is the 10 million year time interval directly after the K–Pg extinction event, which ended the Cretaceous Period and the Mesozoic Era, and initiated the Cenozoic Era and the Paleogene period. It is divided into three ages: the Danian spanning 66 to 61.6 million years ago (mya), the Selandian spanning 61.6 to 59.2 mya, and the Thanetian spanning 59.2 to 56 mya. It is succeeded by the Eocene.[12]

The K–Pg boundary is clearly defined in the fossil record in numerous places around the world by a high-iridium band, as well as discontinuities with fossil flora and fauna. It is generally thought that a 10 to 15 km (6 to 9 mi) wide asteroid impact, forming the Chicxulub Crater in the Yucatán Peninsula in the Gulf of Mexico, and Deccan Trap volcanism caused a cataclysmic event at the boundary resulting in the extinction of 75% of all species.[13][14][15][16]

The Paleocene ended with the Paleocene–Eocene thermal maximum, a short period of intense warming and ocean acidification brought about by the release of carbon en masse into the atmosphere and ocean systems,[17] which led to a mass extinction of 30–50% of benthic foraminifera–planktonic species which are used as bioindicators of the health of a marine ecosystem—one of the largest in the Cenozoic.[18][19] This event happened around 55.8 mya, and was one of the most significant periods of global change during the Cenozoic.[17][20][21]

Stratigraphy

Geologists divide the rocks of the Paleocene into a stratigraphic set of smaller rock units called stages, each formed during corresponding time intervals called ages. Stages can be defined globally or regionally. For global stratigraphic correlation, the ICS ratify global stages based on a Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) from a single formation (a stratotype) identifying the lower boundary of the stage. In 1989, the ICS decided to split the Paleocene into three stages: the Danian, Selandian, and Thanetian.[22]

The Danian was first defined in 1847 by German-Swiss geologist Pierre Jean Édouard Desor based on the Danish chalks at Stevns Klint and Faxse, and was part of the Cretaceous, succeeded by the Tertiary Montian stage.[23][24] In 1982, after it was shown that the Danian and the Montian are the same, the ICS decided to define the Danian as starting with the K–PG boundary, thus ending the practice of including the Danian in the Cretaceous. In 1991, the GSSP was defined as a well-preserved section in the El Haria Formation near El Kef, Tunisia, 36.1537°N 8.6486°E / 36.1537; 8.6486, and the proposal was officially published in 2006.[25]

The sea cliffs of Itzurun beach near the town of Zumaia, Spain, the GSSP for the Selandian and Thanetian

The Selandian and Thanetian are both defined in Itzurun beach by the Basque town of Zumaia, 43.3006°N 2.2594°W / 43.3006; -2.2594, as the area is a continuous early Santonian to early Eocene sea cliff outcrop. The Paleocene section is an essentially complete, exposed record 165 m (541 ft) thick, mainly composed of alternating hemipelagic sediments deposited at a depth of about 1,000 m (3,300 ft). The Danian deposits are sequestered into the Aitzgorri Limestone Formation, and the Selandian and early Thanetian into the Itzurun Formation. The Itzurun Formation is divided into groups A and B corresponding to the two stages respectively. The two stages were ratified in 2008, and this area was chosen because of its completion, low risk of erosion, proximity to the original areas the stages were defined, accessibility, and the protected status of the area due to its geological significance.[22]

The Selandian was first proposed by Danish geologist Alfred Rosenkrantz in 1924 based on a section of fossil-rich glauconitic marls overlain by gray clay which unconformably overlies Danian chalk and limestone. The area is now subdivided into the Æbelø Formation, Holmehus Formation, and the Østerrende Clay. The beginning of this stage is defined by the end of the 40 million years carbonate rock deposition from an open ocean environment in the North Sea region. The Selandian deposits in this area are directly overlain by the Eocene Fur Formation—the Thanetian was not represented here—and this discontinuity in the deposition record is why the GSSP was moved to Zumaia. Today, the beginning of the Selandian is marked by the appearances of the planktonic Fasciculithus tympaniformis, Neochiastozygus perfectus, and Chiasmolithus edentulus, though some foraminifera are used by various authors.[22]

The Thanetian was first proposed by Swiss geologist Eugène Renevier, in 1873; he included the south England Thanet, Woolwich, and Reading formations. In 1880, French geologist Gustave Frédéric Dollfus narrowed the definition to just the Thanet Formation. The Thanetian begins a little after the mid-Paleocene biotic event[22]—a short-lived climatic event caused by an increase in methane[26]—recorded at Itzurun as a dark 1 m (3.3 ft) interval from a reduction of calcium carbonate. At Itzurun, it begins about 29 m (95 ft) above the base of the Selandian, and is marked by the first appearance of the algae Discoaster and a diversification of Heliolithus, though the best correlation is in terms of geochronology. A chron is the occurrence of a geomagnetic reversal—when the North and South poles switch polarities. Chron 1 (C1n) is defined as modern day to about 780,000 years ago, and the n denotes "normal" as in the polarity of today, and an r "reverse" for the opposite polarity.[27] The beginning of the Thanetian is best correlated with the C26r/C26n reversal.[22]

Sedimentology

Paleocene coal is extracted at the Cerrejón mine, the world's largest open-pit mine

Several economically important coal deposits formed during the Paleocene, such as the sub-bituminous Fort Union Formation in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming and Montana,[28] which produces 43% of American coal;[29] the Wilcox Group in Texas, the richest deposits of the Gulf Coastal Plain;[30] and the Cerrejón mine in Colombia, the largest open-pit mine in the world.[31] Important phosphate deposits—predominantly of francolite—near Métlaoui, Tunisia were formed from the late Paleocene to the early Eocene.[32] In the North Sea, Paleocene-derived natural gas reserves, when they were discovered, totaled approximately 2.23 trillion m3 (7.89 trillion ft3), and oil in place 13.54 billion barrels.[33]

Major meteor craters formed in the Paleocene include: the Connolly Basin crater in Western Australia less than 60 mya,[34] the Texan Marquez crater 58 mya,[35] and possibly the Jordan Jabel Waqf as Suwwan crater which dates to between 56 and 37 mya,[36] and the Silverpit crater which dates to 75–45 mya.[37] Vanadium-rich osbornite from the Isle of Skye, Scotland, dating to 60 mya may be impact ejecta.[38] Craters were also formed near the K–Pg boundary, the largest the Mexican Chicxulub crater whose impact was a major precipitator of the extinction event,[39] and also the Ukrainian Boltysh crater,[40] the Canadian Eagle Butte crater (though it may be younger),[41] the Vista Alegre crater[42] (though this may date to about 115 mya[43]), and the contested[44] Indian Shiva crater.[45] Silicate glass spherules along the Atlantic coast of the U.S. indicate a meteor impact in the region at the PETM.[46]

Paleogeography

Paleotectonics

The Laramide orogeny was caused by the subduction of oceanic crust under the North American plate

During the Paleocene, the continents continued to drift toward their present positions.[47] In the Northern Hemisphere, the former components of Laurasia (North America and Eurasia) were, at times, connected via land bridges: Beringia (at 65.5 and 58 mya) between North America and East Asia, the De Geer route (from 71–63 mya) between Greenland and Scandinavia, the Thulean route (at 57 and 55.8 mya) between North America and Western Europe via Greenland, and the Turgai route connecting Europe with Asia (which were otherwise separated by the Turgai Strait at this time).[48][49]

The Laramide orogeny, which began in the Late Cretaceous, continued to uplift the Rocky Mountains; it ended at the end of the Paleocene.[50] Because of this and a drop in sea levels resulting from tectonic activity, the Western Interior Seaway, which had divided the continent of North America for much of the Cretaceous, had receded.[51]

Between about 60.5 and 54.5 mya, there was heightened volcanic activity in the North Atlantic region—the third largest magmatic event in the last 150 million years—creating the North Atlantic Igneous Province.[52][53] The proto-Iceland hotspot is sometimes cited as being responsible for the initial volcanism, though rifting and resulting volcanism have also contributed.[53][54][55] This volcanism may have contributed to the opening of the North Atlantic Ocean and seafloor spreading, the divergence of the Greenland Plate from the North American Plate,[56] and, climatically, the thermal maximum by dissociating methane clathrate crystals on the seafloor resulting in the mass release of carbon.[52][57]

North and South America remained separated by the Central American Seaway, though an island arc (the South Central American Arc) had already formed about 73 mya. The Caribbean Large Igneous Province (now the Caribbean Plate), which had formed from the Galápagos hotspot in the Pacific in the latest Cretaceous, was moving eastward as the North American and South American plates were getting pushed in the opposite direction due to the opening of the Atlantic (strike-slip tectonics).[58][59] This motion would eventually uplift the Isthmus of Panama by 2.6 mya. The Caribbean Plate continued moving until about 50 mya when it reached its current position.[60]

The breakup of Gondwana:
A) Early Cretaceous
B) Late Cretaceous
C) Paleocene
D) Present

The components of the former southern supercontinent Gondwanaland in the Southern Hemisphere continued to drift apart, but Antarctica was still connected to South America and Australia. Africa was heading north towards Europe, and the Indian subcontinent towards Asia, which would eventually close the Tethys Ocean.[47] The Indian and Eurasian Plates began colliding sometime in the Paleocene or Eocene with uplift (and a land connection) beginning in the Miocene about 24–17 mya. There is evidence that some plants and animals could migrate between India and Asia during the Paleocene, possibly via intermediary island arcs.[61]

Paleoceanography

In the modern thermohaline circulation, warm tropical water becomes colder and saltier at the poles and sinks (downwelling or deep water formation) that occurs at the North Atlantic near the North Pole and the Southern Ocean near the Antarctic Peninsula. In the Paleocene, the waterways between the Arctic Ocean and the North Atlantic were somewhat restricted, so North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)—which circulates cold water from the Arctic towards the equator—had not yet formed, and so deep water formation probably did not occur in the North Atlantic. The Arctic and Atlantic would not be connected by sufficiently deep waters until the early to middle Eocene.[62]

There is evidence of deep water formation in the North Pacific to at least a depth of about 2,900 m (9,500 ft). The elevated global deep water temperatures in the Paleocene may have been too warm for thermohaline circulation to be predominately heat driven.[63][64] It is possible that the greenhouse climate shifted precipitation patterns, such that the Southern Hemisphere was wetter than the Northern, or the Southern experienced less evaporation than the Northern. In either case, this would have made the Northern more saline than the Southern, creating a density difference and a downwelling in the North Pacific traveling southward.[63] Deep water formation may have also occurred in the South Atlantic.[65]

It is largely unknown how global currents could have affected global temperature. The formation of the Northern Component Waters by Greenland in the Eocene—the predecessor of the AMOC—may have caused an intense warming in the North Hemisphere and cooling in the Southern, as well as an increase in deep water temperatures.[62] In the PETM, it is possible deep water formation occurred in saltier tropical waters and moved polewards, which would increase global surface temperatures by warming the poles.[19][64] Also, Antarctica was still connected to South America and Australia, and, because of this, the Antarctic Circumpolar Current—which traps cold water around the continent and prevents warm equatorial water from entering—had not yet formed. Its formation may have been related in the freezing of the continent.[66] Warm coastal upwellings at the poles would have inhibited permanent ice cover.[64] Conversely, it is possible deep water circulation was not a major contributor to the greenhouse climate, and deep water temperatures more likely change as a response to global temperature change rather than affecting it.[63][64]

In the Arctic, coastal upwelling may have been largely temperature and wind-driven. In summer, the land surface temperature was probably higher than oceanic temperature, and the opposite was true in the winter, which is consistent with monsoon seasons in Asia. Open-ocean upwelling may have also been possible.[64]

Climate

Average climate

Global average land (above) and deep sea (below) temperatures throughout the Cenozoic

The Paleocene climate was, much like in the Cretaceous, tropical or subtropical,[47][67][68][69] and the poles were temperate[70] and ice free[71] with an average global temperature of roughly 24–25 °C (75–77 °F).[72] For comparison, the average global temperature for the period between 1951 and 1980 was 14 °C (57 °F).[73]

Global deep water temperatures in the Paleocene likely ranged from 8–12 °C (46–54 °F),[63][64] compared to 0–3 °C (32–37 °F) in modern day.[74] Based on the upper limit, average sea surface temperatures at 60°N and S would have been the same as deep sea temperatures, at 30°N and S about 23 °C (73 °F), and at the equator about 28 °C (82 °F),[64] which is comparable to modern day. Until the mid-Miocene, deep sea and surface water temperatures varied synchronously—as one dipped, so did the other—and, as such, there were probably not very defined thermoclines—layers of water of different temperatures which allow for a large difference in deep water and surface temperatures.[75]

Early Paleocene atmospheric CO2 levels at what is now Castle Rock, Colorado were calculated to be between 352–1,110 parts per million (ppm), with a median of 616 ppm. Based on this and estimated plant-gas exchange rates and global surface temperatures, the climate sensitivity was calculated to be +3 °C when CO2 levels doubled, compared to 7° following the formation of ice at the poles. CO2 levels alone may have been insufficient in maintaining the greenhouse climate, and some positive feedbacks must have been active, such as some combination of cloud, aerosol, or vegetation related processes.[76]

The poles probably had a cool temperate climate; northern Antarctica, Australia, the southern tip of South America, what is now the US and Canada, eastern Siberia, and Europe warm temperate; middle South America, southern and northern Africa, South India, Middle America, and China arid; and northern South America, central Africa, North India, middle Siberia, and what is now the Mediterranean Sea tropical.[77]

Climatic events

The effects of the meteor impact and volcanism 66 mya and the climate across the K–Pg boundary were likely fleeting, and climate reverted to normal in a short time frame.[78] The freezing temperatures probably reversed after 3 years[79] and returned to normal within decades,[80] sulfuric acid aerosols causing acid rain probably dissipated after 10 years,[81] and dust from the impact blocking out sunlight and inhibiting photosynthesis would have lasted up to a year[82] though potential global wildfires raging for several years would have released more particulates into the atmosphere.[83] For the following half million years, the carbon isotope gradient—a difference in the 13C/12C ratio between surface and deep ocean water, causing carbon to cycle into the deep sea—may have shut down. This, termed a "Strangelove ocean", indicates low oceanic productivity;[84] resultant decreased phytoplankton activity may have led to a reduction in cloud seeds and, thus, marine cloud brightening, causing global temperatures to increase by 6°C (CLAW hypothesis).[85]

The Dan–C2 Event 65.2 mya in the early Danian spanned about 100,000 years, and was characterized by an increase in carbon, particularly in the deep sea. Since the mid-Maastrichtian, more and more carbon had been sequestered in the deep sea possibly due to a global cooling trend and increased circulation into the deep sea. The Dan–C2 event may represent a release of this carbon after deep sea temperatures rose to a certain threshold, as warmer water can dissolve a lesser amount of carbon.[86] Savanna may have temporarily displaced forestland in this interval.[87]

Around 62.2 mya in the late Danian, there was a warming event and evidence of ocean acidification associated with an increase in carbon; at this time, there was major seafloor spreading in the Atlantic and volcanic activity along the southeast margin of Greenland. The Latest Danian Event, also known as the Top Chron C27n Event, lasted about 200,000 years and resulted in a 1.6–2.8 °C increase in temperatures throughout the water column. Though the temperature in the latest Danian varied at about the same magnitude, this event coincides with an increase of carbon.[88]

About 60.5 mya at the Danian/Selandian boundary, there is evidence of anoxia spreading out into coastal waters, and a drop in sea levels which is most likely explained as an increase in temperature and evaporation, as there was no ice at the poles to lock up water.[89]

During the mid-Paleocene biotic event (MPBE) around 59 mya (roughly 50,000 years before the Selandian/Thanetian boundary), the temperature spiked probably due to a mass release of the deep sea methane hydrate into the atmosphere and ocean systems. Carbon was probably output for 10–11,000 years, and the aftereffects likely subsided around 52–53,000 years later.[90] There is also evidence this occurred again 300,000 years later in the early Thanetian dubbed MPBE-2. Respectively, about 83 and 132 gigatons of methane-derived carbon were ejected into the atmosphere, which suggests a 2–3 °C (3.6–5.4 °F) rise in temperature, and likely caused heightened seasonality and less stable environmental conditions. It may have also caused an increase of grass in some areas.[26]

The Paleocene–Eocene thermal maximum was an approximate 200,000 year long event where the global average temperature rose by some 5 to 8 °C (9 to 14 °F),[52] and mid-latitude and polar areas may have exceeded modern tropical temperatures of 24–29 °C (75–84 °F).[91] This was due to an ejection of 2,500–4,500 gigatons of carbon into the atmosphere, most likely caused by the perturbation and release of methane clathrate deposits in the North Atlantic from tectonic activity and resulting increase in bottom water temperatures.[52] The duration of carbon output is controversial, but most likely about 2,500 years.[92] This carbon also interfered with the carbon cycle and caused ocean acidification,[93][94] and potentially altered[65] and slowed down ocean currents, the latter leading to the expansion of oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) in the deep sea.[95] In surface water, OMZs could have also been caused from the formation of strong thermoclines preventing oxygen inflow, and higher temperatures equated to higher productivity leading to higher oxygen usurpation.[96] Further, expanding OMZs could have caused the proliferation of sulfate-reducing microorganisms which create highly toxic hydrogen sulfide H2S as a waste product. During the event, the volume of sulfidic water may have been 10–20% of total ocean volume, in comparison to today's 1%. This may have also caused chemocline upwellings along continents and the dispersal of H2S into the atmosphere.[97] During the PETM there was a temporary dwarfing of mammals apparently caused by the upward excursion in temperature.[98]

Flora

Restoration of a Patagonian landscape during the Danian

The warm, wet climate supported tropical and subtropical forests worldwide, mainly populated by conifers and broad-leafed trees.[99][71] In Patagonia, the landscape supported tropical rainforests, cloud rainforests, mangrove forests, swamp forests, savannas, and sclerophyllous forests.[71] In the Colombian Cerrejón Formation, fossil flora belong to the same families as modern day flora—such as palm trees, legumes, aroids, and malvales[100]—and the same is true in the North Dakotan Almont/Beicegel Creek—such as Ochnaceae, Cyclocarya, and Ginkgo cranei[101]—indicating the same floral families have characterized South American rainforests and the American Western Interior since the Paleocene.[100][101]

Reconstruction of the late Paleocene Ginkgo cranei

The extinction of large herbivorous dinosaurs may have allowed the forests to grow quite dense,[70] and there is little evidence of wide open plains.[99] Plants evolved several techniques to cope with high plant density, such as buttressing to better absorb nutrients and compete with other plants, increased height to reach sunlight, larger diaspore in seeds to provide added nutrition on the dark forest floor, and epiphytism where a plant grows on another plant in response to less space on the forest floor.[99] Despite increasing density—which could act as fuel—wildfires decreased in frequency from the Cretaceous to the early Eocene as the atmospheric oxygen levels decreased to modern day levels, though they may have been more intense.[102]

Recovery

There was a major die-off of plant species over the boundary; for example, in the Williston Basin of North Dakota, an estimated 1/3 to 3/5 of plant species went extinct.[103] The extinction event ushered in a floral turnover; for example, the once commonplace Araucariaceae conifers were almost fully replaced by Podocarpaceae conifers, and the once rare Cheirolepidiaceae conifers became the dominant trees in Patagonia.[104][99] Some plant communities, such as those in eastern North America, were already experiencing an extinction event in the late Maastrichtian, particularly in the 1 million years before the extinction event.[105] The "disaster plants" that refilled the emptied landscape crowded out many Cretaceous plants, and resultantly, many went extinct by the middle Paleocene.[67]

The conifer Glyptostrobus europaeus from the Canadian Paskapoo Formation

The strata immediately overlaying the K–Pg extinction event are especially rich in fern fossils. Ferns are often the first species to colonize areas damaged by forest fires, so this "fern spike" may mark the recovery of the biosphere following the impact (which caused blazing fires worldwide).[106][107] The diversifying herb flora of the early Paleocene either represent pioneer species which re-colonized the recently emptied landscape, or a response to the increased amount of shade provided in a forested landscape.[105] Lycopods, ferns, and angiosperm shrubs may have been important components of the Paleocene understory.[99]

In general, the forests of the Paleocene were species-poor, and diversity did not fully recover until the end of the Paleocene.[67][108] For example, the floral diversity of what is now the Holarctic region (comprising most of the Northern Hemisphere) was mainly early members of Ginkgo, Metasequoia, Glyptostrobus, Macginitiea, Platanus, Carya, Ampelopsis, and Cercidiphyllum.[99] Patterns in plant recovery varied significantly with latitude, climate, and altitude. For example, what is now Castle Rock, Colorado featured a rich rainforest only 1.4 million years after the event, probably due to a rain shadow effect causing regular monsoon seasons.[108] Conversely, low plant diversity and a lack of specialization in insects in the Colombian Cerrejón Formation, dated to 58 mya, indicates the ecosystem was still recovering from the extinction event 7 million years later.[100]

Angiosperms

Fossil Platanus fruit from the Canadian Paskapoo Formation

Flowering plants (angiosperms), which had become dominant among forest taxa by the middle Cretaceous 110–90 mya,[109] continued to develop and proliferate, more so to take advantage of the recently emptied niches and an increase in rainfall.[105] Along with them coevolved the insects that fed on these plants and pollinated them. Predation by insects was especially high during the thermal maximum.[110] Many fruit-bearing plants appeared in the Paleocene in particular, probably to take advantage of the newly evolving birds and mammals for seed dispersal.[111]

In what is now the Gulf Coast, angiosperm diversity increased slowly in the early Paleocene, and more rapidly in the middle and late Paleocene. This may have been because the effects of the extinction event were still to some extent felt in the early Paleocene, the early Paleocene may not have had as many open niches, early angiosperms may not have been able to evolve at such an accelerated rate as later angiosperms, low diversity equates to lower evolution rates, or there was not much angiosperm migration into the region in the early Paleocene.[105] Over the extinction event, angiosperms had a higher extinction rate than gymnosperms (which include conifers, cycads, and relatives) and pteridophytes (ferns, horsetails, and relatives); zoophilous angiosperms (those that relied on animals for pollination) had a higher rate than anemophilous angiosperms; and evergreen angiosperms had a higher rate than deciduous angiosperms as deciduous plants can become dormant in harsh conditions.[105]

In the Gulf Coast, angiosperms experienced another extinction event during the thermal maximum, which they recovered quickly from in the Eocene through immigration from the Caribbean and Europe. During this time, the climate became warmer and wetter, and it is possible that angiosperms evolved to become stenotopic by this time, able to inhabit a narrow range of temperature and moisture; or, since the dominant floral ecosystem was a highly integrated and complex closed-canopy rainforest by the middle Paleocene, the plant ecosystems were more vulnerable to climate change.[105] There is some evidence that, in the Gulf Coast, there was an extinction event in the late Paleocene preceding the thermal maximum, which may have been due to the aforementioned vulnerability of complex rainforests, and the ecosystem may have been disrupted by only a small change in climate.[112]

Polar forests

Metasequoia occidentalis from the Canadian Scollard Formation

The warm Paleocene climate, much like that of the Cretaceous, allowed for diverse polar forests. Whereas precipitation is a major factor in plant diversity nearer the equator, polar plants had to adapt to varying light availability (polar nights and midnight suns) and temperatures. Because of this, plants from both poles independently evolved some similar characteristics, such as broad leaves. Plant diversity at both poles increased throughout the Paleocene, especially at the end, in tandem with the increasing global temperature.[113]

At the North Pole, woody angiosperms had become the dominant plants, a reversal from the Cretaceous where herbs proliferated. The Iceberg Bay Formation on Ellesmere Island, Nunavut (latitude 75–80° N) shows remains of a late Paleocene redwood forest, the canopy reaching around 32 m (105 ft), and a climate similar to the Pacific Northwest.[70] On the Alaska North Slope, Metasequoia was the dominant conifer. Much of the diversity represented migrants from nearer the equator. Deciduousness was dominant, probably to conserve energy by retroactively shedding leaves and retaining some energy rather than having them die from frostbite.[113]

At the South Pole, due to the increasing isolation of Antarctica, many plant taxa were endemic to the continent instead of migrating down. Patagonian flora may have originated in Antarctica.[113][114] The climate was much cooler than in the Late Cretaceous, though frost probably was not common in at least coastal areas. East Antarctica was likely warm and humid. Because of this, evergreen forests could proliferate as, in the absence of frost and a low probability of leaves dying, it was more energy efficient to retain leaves than to regrow them every year. One possibility is that the interior of the continent favored deciduous trees, though prevailing continental climates may have produced winters warm enough to support evergreen forests. Like in the Cretaceous, southern beeches, Podocarpaceous conifers, Nothofagus, and Proteaceae angiosperms were proliferous.[113]

Fauna

In the K–PG extinction event, every land animal over 25 kg (55 lb) was wiped out, leaving open several niches at the beginning of the epoch.[115]

Mammals

Restoration of the herbivorous late Paleocene pantodont Barylambda, which could have weighed up to 650 kg (1,430 lb)[116]

Mammals had first appeared in the Late Triassic, and remained small and nocturnal throughout the Mesozoic to avoid competition with dinosaurs (nocturnal bottleneck),[117] though, by the Middle Jurassic, they had branched out into several habitats—such as subterranean, arboreal, and aquatic—[118] and the largest known Mesozoic mammal, Repenomamus robustus reached about 1 m (3 ft 3 in) in length and 12–14 kg (26–31 lb) in weight–comparable to the modern day Virginia opossum.[119] Though some mammals could sporadically venture out in daytime (cathemerality) by roughly 10 million years before the extinction event, they only became strictly diurnal (active in the daytime) sometime after.[117]

In general, Paleocene mammals retained this small size until near the end of the epoch, and, consequently, early mammal bones are not well preserved in the fossil record, and most of what is known comes from fossil teeth.[47] Multituberculates, a now-extinct rodent-like group not closely related to any modern mammal, were the most successful group of mammals in the Mesozoic, and they reached peak diversity in the early Paleocene. During this time, multituberculate taxa had a wide range of dental complexity, which correlates to a broader range in diet for the group as a whole. Multituberculates declined in the late Paleocene and went extinct at the end of the Eocene, possibly due to competition from newly evolving rodents.[120]

The mesonychid Sinonyx at the Museo delle Scienze

Nonetheless, following the extinction event, mammals very quickly diversified and filled the empty niches.[121][122] Modern mammals are subdivided into therians (modern members are placentals and marsupials) and monotremes. The first placentals and marsupials evolved in the Paleocene.[123] Paleocene marsupials include Peradectes,[124] and monotremes Monotrematum.[125][126] The epoch featured the rise of many crown placental groups—groups that have living members in modern day—such as the earliest afrotherian Ocepeia, xenarthran Utaetus, rodent Tribosphenomys and Paramys, the forerunners of primates the Plesiadapiformes, earliest carnivorans Ravenictis and Pristinictis, possible pangolins Palaeanodonta, possible forerunners of odd-toed ungulates Phenacodontidae, and eulipotyphlans Nyctitheriidae.[127] Though therian mammals had probably already begun to diversify around 10 to 20 mya before the extinction event, average mammal size increased greatly after the boundary, and a radiation into frugivory (fruit-eating) and omnivory began, namely with the newly evolving large herbivores such as the Taeniodonta, Tillodonta, Pantodonta, Polydolopimorphia, and the Dinocerata.[123][128] Large carnivores include the wolf-like Mesonychia, such as Ankalagon[129] and Sinonyx.[130]

Though there was an explosive diversification, the affinities of most Paleocene mammals are unknown, and only primates, carnivorans, and rodents have unambiguous Paleocene origins, resulting in a 10 million year gap in the fossil record of other mammalian crown orders[127] which do not appear until after the PETM and the subsequent retreat of forests. Some attribute this to the idea that mammals did not achieve great size until the proliferation of grasslands, as grass, being harder to digest than leaves, caused an increase in herbivore size, which led to an increase in predator size.[98][131][132][133] The most species-rich order of Paleocene mammals is Condylarthra, which is a wastebasket taxon for miscellaneous bunodont hoofed mammals. Other ambiguous orders include the Leptictida, Cimolesta, and Creodonta. This uncertainty blurs the early evolution of placentals.[127]

Birds

Gastornis restoration

According to DNA studies, modern birds (Neornithes) rapidly diversified following the extinction of the dinosaurs in the Paleocene, and nearly all modern bird lineages can trace their origins to this epoch with the exception of fowl and the paleognaths. This was one of the fastest diversifications of any group,[134] probably fueled by the diversification of fruit-bearing trees and associated insects, and the modern bird groups had likely already diverged within 4 million years of the extinction event. However, the fossil record of birds in the Paleocene is rather poor compared to other groups, limited globally to mainly waterbirds such as the early penguin Waimanu. The earliest arboreal crown group bird known is Tsidiiyazhi, a mousebird dating to around 62 mya.[135] The fossil record also includes early owls such as the large Berruornis from France,[136] and the smaller Ogygoptynx from the United States.[137]

Almost all archaic birds (any bird outside Neornithes) went extinct during the extinction event, although the archaic Qinornis is recorded in the Paleocene.[135] Their extinction may have led to the proliferation of neornithine birds in the Paleocene, and the only known Cretaceous neornithine bird is the waterbird Vegavis, and possibly also the waterbird Teviornis.[138]

In the Mesozoic, birds and pterosaurs exhibited size-related niche partitioning—no known Late Cretaceous flying bird had a wingspan greater than 2 m (6 ft 7 in) nor exceeded a weight of 5 kg (11 lb), whereas contemporary pterosaurs ranged from 2–10 m (6 ft 7 in–32 ft 10 in), probably to avoid competition. Their extinction allowed flying birds to attain greater size, such as pelagornithids and pelecaniformes.[139] The Paleocene pelagornithid Protodontopteryx was quite small compared to later members, with a wingspan of about 1 m (3.3 ft), comparable to a gull.[140] On the archipelago-continent of Europe, the flightless bird Gastornis was the largest herbivore at 2 m (6 ft 7 in) tall for the largest species, possibly due to lack of competition from newly emerging large mammalian herbivores which were prevalent on the other continents.[115][141] The carnivorous terror birds in South America have a contentious appearance in the Paleocene with Paleopsilopterus, though the first definitive appearance is in the Eocene.[142]

Reptiles

Borealosuchus at the Field Museum of Natural History

It is generally believed all non-avian dinosaurs went extinct at the K–Pg extinction event 66 mya, though there are a couple of controversial claims of Paleocene dinosaurs which would indicate a gradual decline of dinosaurs. Contentious dates include remains from the Hell Creek Formation dated 40,000 years after the boundary,[143] and a hadrosaur femur from the San Juan Basin dated to 64.5 mya,[144] but such stray late forms may be zombie taxa that were washed out and moved to younger sediments.[145]

In the wake of the extinction event, 83% of lizard and snake (squamate) species went extinct, and the diversity did not fully recover until the end of the Paleocene. However, since the only major squamate lineages to disappear in the event were the mosasaurs and polyglyphanodontians (the latter making up 40% of Maastrichtian lizard diversity), and most major squamate groups had evolved by the Cretaceous, the event probably did not greatly affect squamate evolution, and newly evolving squamates did not seemingly branch out into new niches as mammals. That is, Cretaceous and Paleogene squamates filled the same niches. Nonetheless, there was a faunal turnover of squamates, and groups that were dominant by the Eocene were not as abundant in the Cretaceous, namely the anguids, iguanas, night lizards, pythons, colubrids, boas, and worm lizards. Only small squamates are known from the early Paleocene—the largest snake Helagras was 950 mm (37 in) in length[146]—but the late Paleocene snake Titanoboa grew to over 13 m (43 ft) long, the longest snake ever recorded.[147]

Freshwater crocodiles and choristoderans were among the aquatic reptiles to have survived the extinction event, probably because freshwater environments were not as impacted as marine ones.[148] One example of a Paleocene crocodile is Borealosuchus, which averaged 3.7 m (12 ft) in length at the Wannagan Creek site.[149] Two choristoderans are known from the Paleocene: Champsosaurus—the largest is the Paleocene C. gigas at 3 m (9.8 ft)—and Simoedosaurus—the largest specimen measuring 5 m (16 ft). Choristodera went extinct in the Miocene.[150]

Turtles experienced a decline in the Campanian (Late Cretaceous) during a cooling event, and recovered during the thermal maximum at the end of the Paleocene.[151] Turtles were not greatly affected by the extinction event, and around 80% of species survived.[152] In Colombia, a 60 million year old turtle with a 1.7 m (5 ft 7 in) carapace, Carbonemys, was discovered.[153]

Amphibians

There is little evidence amphibians were affected very much by the extinction event, probably because the freshwater habitats they inhabited were not as greatly impacted as marine environments.[154] In the Hell Creek Formation of eastern Montana, a 1990 study found no extinction in amphibian species across the boundary.[155] Some modern day families have their origins in the Paleocene, such as the true toads.[156]

Fish

The early Paleocene trumpetfish Eekaulostomus from Palenque, Mexico

The small pelagic fish population recovered rather quickly, and there was a low extinction rate for sharks and rays. Overall, only 12% of fish species went extinct.[157] During the Cretaceous, fishes were not very abundant, probably due to heightened predation by or competition with ammonites and squid, although large predatory fish did exist, including ichthyodectids, pachycormids, and pachyrhizodontids.[158] Almost immediately following the extinction event, ray-finned fish—today, representing nearly half of all vertebrate taxa—became much more numerous and increased in size, and rose to dominate the open-oceans. Acanthomorphs—a group of ray-finned fish which, today, represent a third of all vertebrate life—experienced a massive diversification following the extinction event, dominating marine ecosystems by the end of the Paleocene, refilling vacant, open-ocean predatory niches as well as spreading out into recovering reef systems. In specific, percomorphs diversified faster than any other vertebrate group at the time, with the exception of birds; Cretaceous percomorphs varied very little in body plan, whereas, by the Eocene, percomorphs evolved into vastly varying creatures[159] such as early scombrids (today, tuna, mackerels, and bonitos),[158] barracudas,[160] jacks,[159] billfish,[161] flatfishes,[162] and aulostomoid (trumpetfish and cornetfish).[163][159][164] However, the discovery of the Cretaceous cusk eel Pastorius shows that the body plans of at least some percomorphs were already highly variable, perhaps indicating an already diverse array of percomorph body plans before the Paleocene.[165]

Otodus obliquus shark tooth from Oued Zem, Morocco

Conversely, sharks and rays appear to have been unable to exploit the vacant niches, and recovered the same pre-extinction abundance.[157][166] There was a faunal turnover of sharks from mackerel sharks to ground sharks, as ground sharks are more suited to hunting the rapidly diversifying ray-finned fish whereas mackerel sharks target larger prey.[167] The first megatoothed shark, Otodus obliquus—the ancestor of the giant megalodon—is recorded from the Paleocene.[168]

Several Paleocene freshwater fish are recorded from North America, including bowfins, gars, arowanas, Gonorynchidae, common catfish, smelts, and pike.[169]

Insects and arachnids

Earwig from the late Paleocene Danish Fur Formation

Insect recovery varied from place to place. For example, it may have taken until the thermal maximum for insect diversity to recover in the western interior of North America, whereas Patagonian insect diversity had recovered by 4 million years after the extinction event. In some areas, such as the Bighorn Basin in Wyoming, there is a dramatic increase in plant predation during the thermal maximum, although this is probably not indicative of a diversification event in insects due to rising temperatures because plant predation decreases following the thermal maximum. More likely, insects followed their host plant or plants which were expanding into mid-latitude regions during the thermal maximum, and then retreated afterward.[110][170]

The middle-to-late Paleocene French Menat Formation shows an abundance of beetles (making up 77.5% of the insect diversity)—especially weevils (50% of diversity), jewel beetles, leaf beetles, and reticulated beetles—as well as other true bugs—such as pond skaters—and cockroaches. To a lesser degree, there are also orthopterans, hymenopterans, butterflies, and flies, though planthoppers were more common than flies. Representing less than 1% of fossil remains dragonflies, caddisflies, mayflies, earwigs, mantises, net-winged insects, and possibly termites.[171]

The Wyoming Hanna Formation is the only known Paleocene formation to produce sizable pieces of amber, as opposed to only small droplets. The amber was formed by a single or a closely-related group of either taxodiaceaen or pine tree(s) which produced cones similar to those of dammaras. Only one insect, a thrips, has been identified.[172]

The ant Napakimyrma paskapooensis from the Canadian Paskapoo Formation

There is a gap in the ant fossil record from 78–55 mya, except for the aneuretine Napakimyrma paskapooensis from the 62–56 million year old Canadian Paskapoo Formation.[173] Given high abundance in the Eocene, two of the modern dominant ant subfamilies—Ponerinae and Myrmicinae—likely originated and greatly diversified in the Paleocene, acting as major hunters of arthropods, and probably competed with each other for food and nesting grounds in the dense angiosperm leaf litter. Myrmicines expanded their diets to seeds and formed trophobiotic symbiotic relationships with aphids, mealybugs, treehoppers, and other honeydew secreting insects which were also successful in angiosperm forests, allowing them to invade other biomes, such as the canopy or temperate environments, and achieve a worldwide distribution by the middle Eocene.[174]

About 80% of the butterfly and moth (lepidopteran) fossil record occurs in the early Paleogene, specifically the late Paleocene and the middle-to-late Eocene. Most Paleocene lepidopteran compression fossils come from the Danish Fur Formation. Though there is low family-level diversity in the Paleocene compared to later epochs, this may be due to a largely incomplete fossil record.[175] The evolution of bats—which likely took place no later than 60 mya—had a profound effect on lepidopterans, which feature several anti-predator adaptations such as echolocation jamming and the ability to detect bat signals.[176]

Bees were likely heavily impacted by the extinction event and a die-off of flowering plants, though the bee fossil record is very limited.[177] The oldest kleptoparasitic bee, Paleoepeolus, is known from the Paleocene 60 mya.[178]

Though the Eocene features, by far, the highest proportion of known fossil spider species, the Paleocene spider assemblage is quite low.[179] Some spider groups began to diversify around the PETM, such as jumping spiders,[180] and possibly coelotine spiders (members of the funnel weaver family).[181]

The diversification of mammals had a profound effect on parasitic insects, namely the evolution of bats, which have more ectoparasites than any other known mammal or bird. The PETM's effect on mammals greatly impacted the evolution of fleas, ticks, and oestroids.[182]

Marine invertebrates

Among marine invertebrates, plankton and those with a planktonic stage in their development (meroplankton) were most impacted by the extinction event, and plankton populations crashed. Nearly 90% of all calcifying plankton species perished.[157] This reverberated up and caused a global marine food chain collapse. For a time, it is possible the carcasses of these creatures—including the once abundant ammonites, Exogyra oysters, and even vertebrates such as mosasaurs—would have provided food for detritovores, but infaunal molluscan filter feeders relying heavily on high plankton populations would have been temporarily replaced by epifaunal brachiopods during the early Paleocene while the ecosystem was recovering.[183]

Marine invertebrate diversity may have taken about 7 million years to recover, though this may be a preservation artifact as anything smaller than 5 mm (0.20 in) is unlikely to be fossilized, and body size may have simply decreased across the boundary.[184] A 2019 study found that in Seymour Island, Antarctica, the marine life assemblage consisted primarily of burrowing creatures—such as burrowing clams and snails—for around 320,000 years after the K–Pg extinction event, and it took around a million years for the marine diversity to return to previous levels. Areas closer to the equator may have been more affected.[78] Sand dollars first evolved in the late Paleocene.[185] The Late Cretaceous decapod crustacean assemblage of James Ross Island appears to have been mainly pioneer species and the ancestors of modern fauna, such as the first Antarctic crabs and the first appearance of the lobsters of the genera Linuparus, Metanephrops, and Munidopsis which still inhabit Antarctica today.[186]

A rudist, the dominant reef-building organism of the Cretaceous

In the Cretaceous, the main reef-building creatures were the box-like bivalve rudists instead of coral—though a diverse Cretaceous coral assemblage did exist—and rudists had collapsed by the time of the extinction event. Some corals are known to have survived in higher latitudes in the Late Cretaceous and into the Paleogene, and hard coral-dominated reefs may have recovered by 8 million years after the extinction event, though the coral fossil record of this time is rather sparse.[187] Though there was a lack of extensive coral reefs in the Paleocene, there were some colonies—mainly dominated by zooxanthellate corals—in shallow coastal (neritic) areas. Starting in the latest Cretaceous and continuing until the early Eocene, calcareous corals rapidly diversified. Corals probably competed mainly with red and coralline algae for space on the seafloor. Calcified dasycladalean green algae experienced the greatest diversity in their evolutionary history in the Paleocene.[188]

See also

  • Moeraki Boulders

Notes

  1. In Lyell's time, epochs were divided into periods. In modern geology, periods are divided into epochs.

References

  1. "International Chronostratigraphic Chart". International Commission on Stratigraphy.
  2. Jones, Daniel (2003) [1917], Peter Roach; James Hartmann; Jane Setter (eds.), English Pronouncing Dictionary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 3-12-539683-2
  3. Schimper, W. P. (1874). Traité de Paléontologie Végétale [Treatise on Paleobotany] (in French). 3. Paris J.G. Bailliere. pp. 680–689.
  4. Pulvertaft, T. C. R. (1999). ""Paleocene" or "Palaeocene"" (PDF). Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark. 46: 52. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 June 2016.
  5. Desnoyers, J. (1829). "Observations sur un ensemble de dépôts marins plus récents que les terrains tertiaires du bassin de la Seine, et constituant une formation géologique distincte; précédées d'un aperçu de la nonsimultanéité des bassins tertiares" [Observations on a set of marine deposits more recent than the tertiary terrains of the Seine basin and constitute a distinct geological formation; preceded by an outline of the non-simultaneity of tertiary basins]. Annales des Sciences Naturelles (in French). 16: 171–214. Archived from the original on 2018-09-10. Retrieved 2019-10-20.
  6. Lyell, C. (1833). Principles of Geology. 3. Geological Society of London. p. 378.
  7. Phillips, J. (1840). "Palæozoic series". Penny Cyclopaedia of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. vol. 17. London, England: Charles Knight and Co. pp. 153–154.
  8. Hörnes, M. (1853). "Mittheilungen an Professor Bronn gerichtet" [Reports addressed to Professor Bronn]. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefakten-kunde (in German): 806–810. hdl:2027/hvd.32044106271273.
  9. George, T. N.; Harland, W. B. (1969). "Recommendations on stratigraphical usage". Proceedings of the Geological Society of London. 156 (1, 656): 139–166.
  10. Odin, G. S.; Curry, D.; Hunziker, J. Z. (1978). "Radiometric dates from NW European glauconites and the Palaeogene time-scale". Journal of the Geological Society. 135 (5): 481–497. Bibcode:1978JGSoc.135..481O. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.135.5.0481.
  11. Knox, R. W. O.'B.; Pearson, P. N.; Barry, T. L. (2012). "Examining the case for the use of the Tertiary as a formal period or informal unit" (PDF). Proceedings of the Geologists' Association. 123 (3): 390–393. doi:10.1016/j.pgeola.2012.05.004.
  12. "ICS – Chart/Time Scale". www.stratigraphy.org. Archived from the original on 30 May 2014. Retrieved 28 August 2019.
  13. Schulte, P. (2010). "The Chicxulub Asteroid Impact and Mass Extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene Boundary" (PDF). Science. 327 (5970): 1214–1218. Bibcode:2010Sci...327.1214S. doi:10.1126/science.1177265. PMID 20203042. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 September 2017. Retrieved 28 August 2019.
  14. Vellekoop, J.; Sluijs, A.; Smit, J.; Schouten, S.; Weijers, J. W. H.; Sinninghe Damste, J. S.; Brinkhuis, H. (2014). "Rapid short-term cooling following the Chicxulub impact at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111 (21): 7537–7541. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.7537V. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319253111. PMC 4040585. PMID 24821785.
  15. Jablonski, D.; Chaloner, W. G. (1994). "Extinctions in the fossil record (and discussion)". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. 344 (1307): 11–17. doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0045.
  16. Sprain, C. J.; Renne, P. R.; Vanderkluysen, L. (2019). "The eruptive tempo of Deccan volcanism in relation to the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary". Science. 363 (6429): 866–870. Bibcode:2019Sci...363..866S. doi:10.1126/science.aav1446. PMID 30792301.
  17. Turner, S. K.; Hull, P. M.; Ridgwell, A. (2017). "A probabilistic assessment of the rapidity of PETM onset". Nature Communications. 8 (353): 353. Bibcode:2017NatCo...8..353K. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00292-2. PMC 5572461. PMID 28842564.
  18. Zhang, Q.; Willems, H.; Ding, L.; Xu, X. (2019). "Response of larger benthic foraminifera to the Paleocene–Eocene thermal maximum and the position of the Paleocene/Eocene boundary in the Tethyan shallow benthic zones: Evidence from south Tibet". GSA Bulletin. 131 (1–2): 84–98. Bibcode:2019GSAB..131...84Z. doi:10.1130/B31813.1.
  19. Kennet, J. P.; Stott, L. D. (1995). "Terminal Paleocene Mass Extinction in the Deep Sea: Association with Global Warming". Effects of Past Global Change on Life: Studies in Geophysics. National Academy of Sciences.
  20. Winguth, C.; Thomas, E. (2012). "Global decline in ocean ventilation, oxygenation, and productivity during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum: Implications for the benthic extinction". Geology. 40 (3): 263–266. Bibcode:2012Geo....40..263W. doi:10.1130/G32529.1.
  21. Schmidt, G. A.; Shindell, D. T. (2003). "Atmospheric composition, radiative forcing, and climate change as a consequence of a massive methane release from gas hydrates" (PDF). Paleoceanography. 18 (1): n/a. Bibcode:2003PalOc..18.1004S. doi:10.1029/2002PA000757. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 October 2011.
  22. Schmitz, B.; Pujalte, V.; Molina, E. (2011). "The Global Stratotype Sections and Points for the bases of the Selandian (Middle Paleocene) and Thanetian (Upper Paleocene) stages at Zumaia, Spain" (PDF). Episodes. 34 (4): 220–243. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2011/v34i4/002. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 August 2018.
  23. Desor, P. J. É. "Sur le terrain Danien, nouvel étage de la craie". Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France (in French). 2.
  24. Harland, W. B.; Armstrong, R. L.; Cox, A. V.; Craig, L. E.; Smith, A. G.; Smith, D. G. (1990). A Geologic Time Scale 1989. Cambridge University Press. p. 61. ISBN 978-0-521-38765-1.
  25. Molina, E.; Alagret, L.; Arenillas, I. (2006). "The Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point for the base of the Danian Stage (Paleocene, Paleogene, "Tertiary", Cenozoic) at El Kef, Tunisia – Original definition and revision" (PDF). Episodes. 29 (4). doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2006/v29i4/004. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 February 2019.
  26. Hyland, E. G.; Sheldon, N. D.; Cotton, J. M. (2015). "Terrestrial evidence for a two-stage mid-Paleocene biotic event" (PDF). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 417: 371–378. Bibcode:2015PPP...417..371H. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.09.031. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 August 2016.
  27. Tauxe, L.; Banerjee, S. K.; Butler, R. F.; van der Voo, R. (2018). "The GPTS and magnetostratigraphy". Essentials of Paleomagnetism: Fifth Web Edition. Scripps Institute of Oceanography. Archived from the original on 8 October 2019.
  28. Flores, R. M.; Bader, L. R. Fort Union coal in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming and Montana: a synthesis (PDF). US Geological Survey. pp. 1–30. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-05-04. Retrieved 2019-11-03.
  29. "Sixteen mines in the Powder River Basin produce 43% of U.S. coal". U.S. Energy Information Administration. 16 August 2019. Archived from the original on 7 November 2019. Retrieved 7 November 2019.
  30. Hook, R. W.; Warwick, P. D.; San Felipo, J. R.; Schultz, A. C.; Nichols, D. J.; Swanson, S. M. "Paleocene coal deposits of the Wilcox group, central Texas". In Warwick, P. D.; Karlsen, A. K.; Merrill, M. D.; Valentine, B. J. (eds.). Geologic Assessment of Coal in the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Plain. American Association of Petroleum Geologists. doi:10.1306/13281367St621291 (inactive 2020-01-29). ISBN 978-1-62981-025-6.
  31. Jaramillo, C. A.; Bayona, G.; Pardo-Trujillo, A.; Rueda, M.; Torres, V.; Harrington, G. J.; Mora, G. (2007). "The Palynology of the Cerrejón Formation (Upper Paleocene) of Northern Colombia". Palynology. 31: 159–183. doi:10.1080/01916122.2007.9989641.
  32. Garnit, H.; Bouhlel, S.; Jarvis, I. (2017). "Geochemistry and depositional environments of Paleocene–Eocene phosphorites: Metlaoui Group, Tunisia" (PDF). Journal of African Earth Sciences. 134: 704–736. Bibcode:2017JAfES.134..704G. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.07.021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-04-29. Retrieved 2019-11-07.
  33. Bain, J. S. (1993). "Historical overview of exploration of Tertiary plays in the UK North Sea". Petroleum Geology Conference. 4: 5–13. doi:10.1144/0040005.
  34. "Connolly Basin". Earth Impact Database. Archived from the original on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 3 November 2019.
  35. "Marquez". Earth Impact Database. Archived from the original on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 3 November 2019.
  36. "Jebel Waqf as Suwwan". Earth Impact Database. Archived from the original on 8 June 2019. Retrieved 3 November 2019.
  37. Stewart, S. A.; Allen, P. J. (2005). "3D seismic reflection mapping of the Silverpit multi-ringed crater, North Sea". Geological Society of America Bulletin. 117 (3): 354–368. Bibcode:2005GSAB..117..354S. doi:10.1130/B25591.1.
  38. Drake, S. M.; Beard, A. D.; Jones, A. P.; Brown, D. J.; Fortes, A. D.; Millar, I. L.; Carter, A.; Baca, J.; Downes, H. (2018). "Discovery of a meteoritic ejecta layer containing unmelted impactor fragments at the base of Paleocene lavas, Isle of Skye, Scotland" (PDF). Geology. 46 (2): 171–174. Bibcode:2018Geo....46..171D. doi:10.1130/G39452.1.
  39. Renne, Paul (2013). "Time Scales of Critical Events Around the Cretaceous-Paleogene Boundary" (PDF). Science. 339 (6120): 684–7. Bibcode:2013Sci...339..684R. doi:10.1126/science.1230492. PMID 23393261. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-04-03. Retrieved 2019-11-04.
  40. "Boltysh". Earth Impact Database. Archived from the original on 12 May 2019. Retrieved 4 November 2019.
  41. "Eagle Butte". Earth Impact Database. Archived from the original on 12 May 2019. Retrieved 3 November 2019.
  42. "Vista Alegre". Earth Impact Database. Archived from the original on 12 May 2019. Retrieved 4 November 2019.
  43. Vasconcelos, M. A. R. (2013). "Update on the current knowledge of the Brazilian impact craters" (PDF). 44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (1318): 1318. Bibcode:2013LPI....44.1318C. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-10-08. Retrieved 2019-11-04.
  44. Mullen, L. (13 October 2004). "Debating the dinosaur extinction". Astrobiology Magazine. Retrieved 4 November 2019.
  45. Chatterjee, S. (August 1997). "Multiple Impacts at the KT Boundary and the Death of the Dinosaurs". Comparative planetology, geological education, history of geosciences. 26. 30th International Geological Congress. pp. 31–54. ISBN 978-90-6764-254-5.
  46. Schaller, M. F.; Fung, M. K.; Wright, J. D.; Katz, M. E.; Kent, D. V. (2016). "Impact ejecta at the Paleocene–Eocene boundary". Science. 354 (6309): 225–229. Bibcode:2016Sci...354..225S. doi:10.1126/science.aaf5466. PMID 27738171.
  47. Hooker, J. J. (2005). "Tertiary to Present: Paleocene". In Selley, R. C.; Cocks, R.; Plimer, I. R. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Geology. 5. Elsevier Limited. pp. 459–465. ISBN 978-0-12-636380-7.
  48. Brikiatis, L. (2014). "The De Geer, Thulean and Beringia routes: key concepts for understanding early Cenozoic biogeography". Journal of Biogeography. 41 (6): 1036–1054. doi:10.1111/jbi.12310.
  49. Graham, A. (2018). "The role of land bridges, ancient environments, and migrations in the assembly of the North American flora". Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 56 (5): 405–429. doi:10.1111/jse.12302.
  50. English, Joseph M.; Johnston, Stephen T. (2004). "The Laramide Orogeny: What Were the Driving Forces?". International Geology Review. 46 (9): 833–838. Bibcode:2004IGRv...46..833E. doi:10.2747/0020-6814.46.9.833.
  51. Slattery, J.; Cobban, W. A.; McKinney, K. C.; Harries, P. J.; Sandness, A. (2013). Early Cretaceous to Paleocene Paleogeography of the Western Interior Seaway: The Interaction of Eustasy and Tectonism. Wyoming Geological Association 68th Annual Field Conference. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4439.8801.
  52. Jolley, D. W.; Bell, B. R. (2002). "The evolution of the North Atlantic Igneous Province and the opening of the NE Atlantic rift". Geological Society of London. 197 (1): 1–13. Bibcode:2002GSLSP.197....1J. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2002.197.01.01.
  53. Rousse, S.; M. Ganerød; M.A. Smethurst; T.H. Torsvik; T. Prestvik (2007). "The British Tertiary Volcanics: Origin, History and New Paleogeographic Constraints for the North Atlantic". Geophysical Research Abstracts. 9.
  54. Hansen, J.; Jerram, D. A.; McCaffrey, K.; Passey, S. R. (2009). "The onset of the North Atlantic Igneous Province in a rifting perspective". Geological Magazine. 146 (3): 309–325. Bibcode:2009GeoM..146..309H. doi:10.1017/S0016756809006347. Archived from the original on 7 October 2019.
  55. Torsvik, T. H.; Mosar, J.; Eide, E. A. (2001). "Cretaceous-Tertiary geodynamics: a North Atlantic exercise" (PDF). Geophysical Journal. 146 (3): 850–866. Bibcode:2001GeoJI.146..850T. doi:10.1046/j.0956-540x.2001.01511.x.
  56. White, R. S.; McKenzie, D. P. (1989). "Magmatism at rift zones: The generation of volcanic continental margins and flood basalts" (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 94 (B6): 7685–7729. Bibcode:1989JGR....94.7685W. doi:10.1029/JB094iB06p07685. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-12-15. Retrieved 2019-09-24.
  57. Maclennan, John; Jones, Stephen M. (2006). "Regional uplift, gas hydrate dissociation and the origins of the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 245 (1): 65–80. Bibcode:2006E&PSL.245...65M. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2006.01.069.
  58. Buchs, David M.; Arculus, Richard J.; Baumgartner, Peter O.; Baumgartner-Mora, Claudia; Ulianov, Alexey (July 2010). "Late Cretaceous arc development on the SW margin of the Caribbean Plate: Insights from the Golfito, Costa Rica, and Azuero, Panama, complexes" (PDF). Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. 11 (7): n/a. Bibcode:2010GGG....11.7S24B. doi:10.1029/2009GC002901. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-14. Retrieved 2019-10-24.
  59. Escuder-Viruete, J.; Pérez-Estuán, A.; Joubert, M.; Weis, D. (2011). "The Pelona-Pico Duarte basalts Formation, Central Hispaniola: an on-land section of Late Cretaceous volcanism related to the Caribbean large igneous province" (PDF). Geologica Acta. 9 (3–4): 307–328. doi:10.1344/105.000001716. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016.
  60. O'Dea, A.; Lessios, H. A.; Coates, A. G.; Eytan, R. I.; Restrepo-Moreno, S. A.; Cione, R. A. (2016). "Formation of the Isthmus of Panama". Science Advances. 2 (8): e1600883. Bibcode:2016SciA....2E0883O. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600883. PMC 4988774. PMID 27540590. Archived from the original on 20 April 2019.
  61. Frederiksen, N. O. (1994). "Middle and Late Paleocene Angiosperm Pollen from Pakistan". Palynology. 18: 91–137. doi:10.1080/01916122.1994.9989442.
  62. Vahlenkamp, M.; Niezgodzki, I.; Niezgodzki, D.; Lohmann, G.; Bickert, T.; Pälike, H. (2018). "Ocean and climate response to North Atlantic seaway changes at the onset of long-term Eocene cooling" (PDF). Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 498: 185–195. Bibcode:2018E&PSL.498..185V. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2018.06.031.
  63. Thomas, D. J. (2004). "Evidence for deep-water production in the North Pacific Ocean during the early Cenozoic warm interval". Nature. 430 (6995): 65–68. Bibcode:2004Natur.430...65T. doi:10.1038/nature02639. PMID 15229597.
  64. Kitchell, J. A.; Clark, D. L. (1982). "Late Cretaceous–Paleogene paleogeography and paleocirculation: Evidence of north polar upwelling". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 40 (1–3): 135–165. Bibcode:1982PPP....40..135K. doi:10.1016/0031-0182(82)90087-6.
  65. Nunes, F.; Norris, R. D. (2006). "Abrupt reversal in ocean overturning during the Palaeocene/Eocene warm period". Nature. 439 (7072): 60–63. Bibcode:2006Natur.439...60N. doi:10.1038/nature04386. PMID 16397495.
  66. Hassold, N. J. C.; Rea, D. K.; van der Pluijm, B. A.; Parés, J. M. (2009). "A physical record of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current: late Miocene to recent slowing of abyssal circulation" (PDF). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 275 (1–4): 28–36. Bibcode:2009PPP...275...28H. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.01.011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-10-29. Retrieved 2019-09-10.
  67. Wilf, P.; Johnson, K. R. (2004). "Land plant extinction at the end of the Cretaceous: A quantitative analysis of the North Dakota megafloral record". Paleobiology. 30 (3): 347–368. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2004)030<0347:LPEATE>2.0.CO;2.
  68. Akhmetiev, M. A. (2007). "Paleocene and Eocene floras of Russia and adjacent regions: Climatic conditions of their development". Paleontological Journal. 41 (11): 1032–1039. doi:10.1134/S0031030107110020.
  69. Akhmetiev, M. A.; Beniamovsky, V. N. (2009). "Paleogene floral assemblages around epicontinental seas and straits in Northern Central Eurasia: proxies for climatic and paleogeographic evolution". Geologica Acta. 7 (1): 297–309. doi:10.1344/105.000000278.
  70. Williams, C. J.; LePage, B. A.; Johnson, A. H.; Vann, D. R. (2009). "Structure, Biomass, and Productivity of a Late Paleocene Arctic Forest". Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 158 (1): 107–127. doi:10.1635/053.158.0106.
  71. Brea, M.; Matheos, S. D.; Raigemborn, M. S.; Iglesias, A.; Zucol, A. F.; Prámparo, M. (2011). "Paleoecology and paleoenvironments of Podocarp trees in the Ameghino Petrified forest (Golfo San Jorge Basin, Patagonia, Argentina): Constraints for Early Paleogene paleoclimate" (PDF). Geologica Acta. 9 (1): 13–28. doi:10.1344/105.000001647. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 August 2017.
  72. Hansen, J.; Sato, M.; Russell, G.; Kharecha, P. (2013). "Climate sensitivity, sea level and atmospheric carbon dioxide". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 371 (2001): 20120294. arXiv:1211.4846. Bibcode:2013RSPTA.37120294H. doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0294. PMC 3785813. PMID 24043864.
  73. "World of Change: Global Temperatures". NASA Earth Observatory. 2010-12-09. Archived from the original on 3 September 2019. Retrieved 10 September 2019.
  74. Bergman, J. (16 February 2011). "Temperature of Ocean Water". Windows to the Universe. Archived from the original on 25 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
  75. Savin, S. M.; Douglas, R. G.; Stehli, F. G. (1975). "Tertiary marine paleotemperatures". Geological Society of America Bulletin. 86 (11): 1499–1510. Bibcode:1975GSAB...86.1499S. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<1499:TMP>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0016-7606.
  76. Kowalczyk, J. B.; Royer, D. L.; Miller, I. M.; Anderson, C. W. (2018). "Multiple Proxy Estimates of Atmospheric CO2 From an Early Paleocene Rainforest". Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology. 33 (12): 1, 427–1, 438. doi:10.1029/2018PA003356. Archived from the original on 2019-04-29. Retrieved 2019-11-07.
  77. "Paleocene Climate". PaleoMap Project. Archived from the original on 4 April 2019. Retrieved 7 September 2019.
  78. Whittle, Rowan; Witts, James; Bowman, Vanessa; Crame, Alistair; Francis, Jane; Ineson, Ion (2019). "Mass extinction". Data from: Nature and timing of biotic recovery in Antarctic benthic marine ecosystems following the Cretaceous–Palaeogene mass extinction. Dryad Digital Repository. doi:10.5061/dryad.v1265j8.
  79. Brugger, Julia; Feulner, Georg; Petri, Stefan (2016). "Baby, it's cold outside: Climate model simulations of the effects of the asteroid impact at the end of the Cretaceous". Geophysical Research Letters. 44 (1): 419–427. Bibcode:2017GeoRL..44..419B. doi:10.1002/2016GL072241.
  80. Vellekoop, J.; Sluijs, A.; Smit, J.; Schouten, S.; Weijers, J. W. H.; Sinninghe Damste, J. S.; Brinkhuis, H. (12 May 2014). "Rapid short-term cooling following the Chicxulub impact at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111 (21): 7537–7541. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.7537V. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319253111. PMC 4040585. PMID 24821785.
  81. Ohno, S.; et al. (2014). "Production of sulphate-rich vapour during the Chicxulub impact and implications for ocean acidification". Nature Geoscience. 7 (4): 279–282. Bibcode:2014NatGe...7..279O. doi:10.1038/ngeo2095.
  82. Pope, K. O.; D'Hondt, S. L.; Marshall, C. R. (15 September 1998). "Meteorite impact and the mass extinction of species at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 95 (19): 11028–11029. Bibcode:1998PNAS...9511028P. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.19.11028. PMC 33889. PMID 9736679.
  83. Belcher, C. M. (2009). "Reigniting the Cretaceous-Palaeogene firestorm debate". Geology. 37 (12): 1147–1148. Bibcode:2009Geo....37.1147B. doi:10.1130/focus122009.1. Check |doi= value (help).
  84. Zanthos, J. C.; Arthur, M. A.; Dean, W. E. (1989). "Geochemical evidence for suppression of pelagic marine productivity at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary". Nature. 337 (6202): 61–64. Bibcode:1989Natur.337...61Z. doi:10.1038/337061a0. Archived from the original on 2017-06-07. Retrieved 2019-11-19.
  85. Rampino, M. R.; Volk, T. (1988). "Mass extinctions, atmospheric sulphur and climatic warming at the K/T boundary". Nature. 332 (6159): 63–65. Bibcode:1988Natur.332...63R. doi:10.1038/332063a0.
  86. Quillévéré, F.; Norris, R. D.; Koon, D.; Wilson, P. A. (2007). "Transient ocean warming and shifts in carbon reservoirs during the early Danian". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 265 (3): 600–615. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.10.040.
  87. Jolley, D. W.; Gilmour, I.; Gilmour, M.; Kemp, D. B.; Kelley, S. P. (2015). "Long-term resilience decline in plant ecosystems across the Danian Dan-C2 hyperthermal event, Boltysh crater, Ukraine". Journal of the Geological Society. 172 (4): 491–498. Bibcode:2015JGSoc.172..491J. doi:10.1144/jgs2014-130. hdl:2164/6186.
  88. Jehl, S.; Bornemann, A.; Deprez, A.; Speijer, R. P. (2015). "The Impact of the Latest Danian Event on Planktic Foraminiferal Faunas at ODP Site 1210 (Shatsky Rise, Pacific Ocean)". PLOS ONE. 10 (11): e0141644. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1041644J. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141644. PMC 4659543. PMID 26606656.
  89. Speijer, R. P. (2003). "Danian-Selandian sea-level change and biotic excursion on the southern Tethyan margin (Egypt)". In Wing, S. L.; Gingerich, P. D.; Schmitz, B.; Thomas, E. (eds.). Causes and Consequences of Globally Warm Climates in the Early Paleogene. Geological Society of America. pp. 275–290. doi:10.1130/0-8137-2369-8.275. ISBN 978-0-8137-2369-3.
  90. Bernoala, G.; Baceta, J. I.; Orue-Etxebarria, X.; Alegret, L. (2008). "The mid-Paleocene biotic event at the Zumaia section (western Pyrenees); evidence of an abrupt environmental disruption". Geophysical Research Abstracts. 10.
  91. Frieling, J.; Gebhardt, H.; Huber, M. (2017). "Extreme warmth and heat-stressed plankton in the tropics during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum". Science Advances. 3 (3): e1600891. Bibcode:2017SciA....3E0891F. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600891. PMC 5336354. PMID 28275727.
  92. Turner, S. K. (2018). "Constraints on the onset duration of the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 376 (2130): 20170082. Bibcode:2018RSPTA.37670082T. doi:10.1098/rsta.2017.0082. PMC 6127381. PMID 30177565.
  93. Bowen, G. J. (2015). "Two massive, rapid releases of carbon during the onset of the Palaeocene–Eocene thermal maximum". Nature Geoscience. 8 (1): 44–47. Bibcode:2015NatGe...8...44B. doi:10.1038/ngeo2316.
  94. McInerney, Francesca A.; Wing, Scott L. (30 May 2011). "The Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum: A Perturbation of Carbon Cycle, Climate, and Biosphere with Implications for the Future". Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 39 (1): 489–516. Bibcode:2011AREPS..39..489M. doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-040610-133431.
  95. Panchuk, K.; Ridgwell, A.; Kump, L. R. (2008). "Sedimentary response to Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum carbon release: A model-data comparison". Geology. 36 (4): 315–318. Bibcode:2008Geo....36..315P. doi:10.1130/G24474A.1.
  96. Zhou, X.; Thomas, E.; Rickaby, R. E. M.; Winguth, A. M. E.; Lu, Z. (2014). "I/Ca evidence for upper ocean deoxygenation during the PETM". Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology. 29 (10): 964–975. Bibcode:2014PalOc..29..964Z. doi:10.1002/2014PA002702.
  97. Yao, W.; Paytan, A.; Wortmann, U. G. (2018). "Large-scale ocean deoxygenation during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum". Science. 361 (6404): 804–806. Bibcode:2018Sci...361..804Y. doi:10.1126/science.aar8658. PMID 30026315.
  98. Secord, R.; Bloch, J.I.; Chester, S.G.B.; Boyer, D.M.; Wood, A.R.; Wing, S.L.; Kraus, M.J.; McInerney, F.A.; Krigbaum, J. (2012). "Evolution of the Earliest Horses Driven by Climate Change in the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum". Science. 335 (6071): 959–962. Bibcode:2012Sci...335..959S. doi:10.1126/science.1213859. PMID 22363006. Archived from the original on 2019-04-09. Retrieved 2020-01-08.
  99. Graham, A. (1999). Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic History of North American Vegetation (PDF). Oxford University Press. pp. 162–169. ISBN 978-0-19-511342-6. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 October 2019.
  100. Wing, S. L.; Herrera, F.; Jaramillo, C. A.; Gómez-Navarro, C.; Wilf, P.; Labandeira, C. C. (2009). "Late Paleocene fossils from the Cerrejón Formation, Colombia, are the earliest record of Neotropical rainforest". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (44): 18627–18632. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10618627W. doi:10.1073/pnas.0905130106. PMC 2762419. PMID 19833876.
  101. Ickert-Bond, S. M.; Pigg, K. B.; DeVore, M. L. (2015). "Paleoochna tiffneyi gen. et sp. nov. (Ochnaceae) from the Late Paleocene Almont/Beicegel Creek Flora, North Dakota, USA". International Journal of Plant Sciences. 176 (9): 892–900. doi:10.1086/683275.
  102. Robson, B. E.; Collinson, M. E.; Riegel, W.; Wilde, V.; Scott, A. C.; Pancost, R. D. (2015). "Early Paleogene wildfires in peat-forming environments at Schöningen, Germany" (PDF). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 437: 43–62. Bibcode:2015PPP...437...53R. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.07.016.
  103. Tschudy, R. H.; Tschudy, B. D. (1986). "Extinction and survival of plant life following the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary event, Western Interior, North America". Geology. 14 (8): 667–670. Bibcode:1986Geo....14..667T. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1986)14<667:EASOPL>2.0.CO;2.
  104. Vajda, V.; Bercovici, A. (2014). "The global vegetation pattern across the Cretaceous–Paleogene mass extinction interval: A template for other extinction events". Global and Planetary Change. 122: 24–49. Bibcode:2014GPC...122...29V. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.07.014.
  105. Frederiksen, N. O. (1994). "Paleocene floral diversities and turnover events in eastern North America and their relation to diversity models". Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 82 (3–4): 225–238. doi:10.1016/0034-6667(94)90077-9.
  106. Vajda, V.; Raine, J. I.; Hollis, C. J. (2001). "Indication of global deforestation at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary by New Zealand fern spike". Science. 294 (5547): 1700–1702. Bibcode:2001Sci...294.1700V. doi:10.1126/science.1064706. PMID 11721051.
  107. Schultz, P. H.; D'Hondt, S. (1996). "Cretaceous-Tertiary (Chicxulub) impact angle and its consequences". Geology. 24 (11): 963–967. Bibcode:1996Geo....24..963S. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0963:CTCIAA>2.3.CO;2.
  108. Johnson, K. R.; Ellis, B. (2002). "A Tropical Rainforest in Colorado 1.4 Million Years After the Cretaceous–Tertiary Boundary". Science. 296 (5577): 2379–2383. Bibcode:2002Sci...296.2379J. doi:10.1126/science.1072102. PMID 12089439.
  109. Wang, W.; Lin, L.; Xiang, X. (2016). "The rise of angiosperm-dominated herbaceous floras: Insights from Ranunculaceae". Scientific Reports. 6: e27259. Bibcode:2016NatSR...627259W. doi:10.1038/srep27259. PMC 4890112. PMID 27251635.
  110. Wilf, P.; Labandeira, C. C. (1999). "Response of Plant–Insect Associations to Paleocene–Eocene Warming" (PDF). Science. 284 (5423): 2153–2156. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.304.8853. doi:10.1126/science.284.5423.2153. PMID 10381875.
  111. Dilcher, D. (2000). "Toward a new synthesis: Major evolutionary trends in the angiosperm fossil record". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 97 (13): 7030–7036. Bibcode:2000PNAS...97.7030D. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.13.7030. PMC 34380. PMID 10860967.
  112. Frederiksen, N. O. (1998). "Upper Paleocene and Lowermost Eocene Angiosperm Pollen Biostratigraphy of the Eastern Gulf Coast and Virginia". Micropaleontology. 44 (1): 45–68. doi:10.2307/1486084. JSTOR 1486084.
  113. Askin, R. A.; Spicer, R. A. (1995). "The Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic History of Vegetation and Climate at Northern and Southern High Latitudes: A Comparison". Effects of Past Global Change on Life. National Academy Press. pp. 156–173.
  114. Tosolini, A.; Cantrill, D. J.; Francis, J. E. (2013). "Paleocene flora from Seymour Island, Antarctica: Revision of Dusén's (1908) angiosperm taxa". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 37 (3): 366–391. doi:10.1080/03115518.2013.764698.
  115. Angst D, Lécuyer C, Amiot R, Buffetaut E, Fourel F, Martineau F, Legendre S, Abourachid A, Herrel A (2014). "Isotopic and anatomical evidence of an herbivorous diet in the Early Tertiary giant bird Gastornis. Implications for the structure of Paleocene terrestrial ecosystems". Naturwissenschaften. 101 (4): 313–322. Bibcode:2014NW....101..313A. doi:10.1007/s00114-014-1158-2. PMID 24563098.
  116. Lucas, S. G. (1998). "Pantodonta". In Janis, C. M.; Scott, K. M.; Jacobs, L. L.; Gunnel, G. F.; Uhen, M. D. (eds.). Evolution of Mammals of North America. Cambridge University Press. p. 274. ISBN 978-0-521-35519-3.
  117. Maor, R.; Dayan, T.; Ferguson-Gow, H.; Jones, K. E. (2017). "Temporal niche expansion in mammals from a nocturnal ancestor after dinosaur extinction". Nature Ecology and Evolution. 1 (12): 1889–1895. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0366-5. PMID 29109469.
  118. Close, R. A.; Friedman, M.; Lloyd, G. T.; Benson, R. B. J. (2015). "Evidence for a Mid-Jurassic Adaptive Radiation in Mammals". Current Biology. 25 (16): 2, 137–2, 142. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.047. PMID 26190074.
  119. Hu, Y.; Meng, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, C. (2005). "Large Mesozoic mammals fed on young dinosaurs". Nature. 433 (7022): 149–152. Bibcode:2005Natur.433..149H. doi:10.1038/nature03102. PMID 15650737.
  120. Wilson, G. P.; Evans, A. R.; Corfe, I. J.; Smits, P. D.; Fortelius, M.; Jernvall, J. (2012). "Adaptive radiation of multituberculate mammals before the extinction of dinosaurs" (PDF). Nature. 483 (7390): 457–460. Bibcode:2012Natur.483..457W. doi:10.1038/nature10880. PMID 22419156. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 August 2017.
  121. Hunter, J. P. (1999). "The radiation of Paleocene mammals with the demise of the dinosaurs: Evidence from southwestern North Dakota". Proceedings of the North Dakota Academy of Sciences. 53.
  122. Alroy, John; Waddell, P. (March 1999). "The Fossil Record of North American Mammals: Evidence for a Paleocene Evolutionary Radiation" (PDF). Systematic Biology. 48 (1): 107–118. doi:10.1080/106351599260472. PMID 12078635.
  123. Grossnickle, D. M.; Newham, E. (2016). "Therian mammals experience an ecomorphological radiation during the Late Cretaceous and selective extinction at the K–Pg boundary". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 283 (1832): 20160256. doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.0256. PMC 4920311.
  124. Williamson, T. E.; Taylor, L. (2011). "New species of Peradectes and Swaindelphys (Mammalia: Metatheria) from the Early Paleocene (Torrejonian) Nacimiento Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico, USA". Palaeontologia Electronica. 14 (3).
  125. Pascual, R.; Archer, M.; Ortiz-Jaureguizar, E.; Prado, J. L.; Goldthep, H.; Hand, S. J. (1992). "First discovery of monotremes in South America". Nature. 356 (6371): 704–706. Bibcode:1992Natur.356..704P. doi:10.1038/356704a0.
  126. Musser, A. M. (2003). "Review of the monotreme fossil record and comparison of palaeontological and molecular data". Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A. 136 (4): 927–942. doi:10.1016/s1095-6433(03)00275-7. PMID 14667856. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016.
  127. Halliday, T. J. D.; Upchurch, P.; Goswami, A. (2017). "Resolving the relationships of Paleocene placental mammals". Biological Reviews. 92 (1): 521–550. doi:10.1111/brv.12242. PMC 6849585. PMID 28075073.
  128. Janis, C. M. (2005). Sues, H. (ed.). Evolution of Herbivory in Terrestrial Vertebrates: Perspectives from the Fossil Record. Cambridge University Press. p. 182. ISBN 978-0-521-02119-7.
  129. O'Leary, M. A.; Lucas, S. G.; Williamson, T. E. (1999). "A new specimen of Ankalagon (Mammalia, Mesonychia) and evidence of sexual dimorphism in mesonychians". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 20 (2): 387–393. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2000)020[0387:ANSOAM]2.0.CO;2.
  130. Zhou, X.; Zhai, R.; Gingerich, P. D.; Chen, L. (1995). "Skull of a New Mesonychid (Mammalia, Mesonychia) from the Late Paleocene of China" (PDF). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 15 (2): 387–400. doi:10.1080/02724634.1995.10011237. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2019-08-27.
  131. Rose, K. D. (1981). "Composition and species diversity in Paleocene and Eocene mammal assemblages: an empirical study". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 1 (3–4): 367–388. doi:10.1080/02724634.1981.10011907.
  132. Lovegrave, B. G.; Mowoe, M. O. (2013). "The evolution of mammal body sizes: responses to Cenozoic climate change in North American mammals". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 26 (6): 1317–1329. doi:10.1111/jeb.12138. PMID 23675820.
  133. Beard, K. C. (2008). "The oldest North American primate and mammalian biogeography during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (10): 3815–3818. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105.3815B. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710180105. PMC 2268774. PMID 18316721.
  134. Suh, A.; Smeds, L.; Ellegren, H. (2015). "The dynamics of incomplete lineage sorting across the ancient adaptive radiation of Neoavian birds". PLoS Biology. 13 (8): e1002224. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002224. PMC 4540587. PMID 26284513.
  135. Ksepka, D. T.; Stidham, T. A.; Williamson, T. E. (2007). "Early Paleocene landbird supports rapid phylogenetic and morphological diversification of crown birds after the K–Pg mass extinction". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114 (30): 8047–8052. doi:10.1073/pnas.1700188114. PMC 5544281. PMID 28696285.
  136. Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1994). "A Large Owl from the Paleocene of France" (PDF). Palaeontology. 37 (2): 339–348. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 August 2019.
  137. Rich, P. V.; Bohaska, D. J. (1981). "The Ogygoptyngidae, a new family of owls from the Paleocene of North America". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 5 (2): 95–102. doi:10.1080/03115518108565424.
  138. Longrich, N. R.; Tokaryk, T.; Field, D. J. (2011). "Mass extinction of birds at the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (37): 15253–15257. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10815253L. doi:10.1073/pnas.1110395108. PMC 3174646. PMID 21914849.
  139. Longrich, N. R.; Martill, D. M.; Andres, B. (2018). "Late Maastrichtian pterosaurs from North Africa and mass extinction of Pterosauria at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary". PLOS ONE. 16 (3): e2001663. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2001663. PMC 5849296. PMID 29534059.
  140. Mayr, G.; Pietri, V. L. D.; Love, L.; Mannering, A.; Scofield, R. P. (2019). "Oldest, smallest and phylogenetically most basal pelagornithid, from the early Paleocene of New Zealand, sheds light on the evolutionary history of the largest flying birds". Papers in Palaeontology. doi:10.1002/spp2.1284.
  141. Witmer, Lawrence M.; Rose, Kenneth D. (8 February 2016). "Biomechanics of the jaw apparatus of the gigantic Eocene bird Diatryma: implications for diet and mode of life". Paleobiology. 17 (2): 95–120. doi:10.1017/s0094837300010435.
  142. Angst, Delphine; Buffetaut, Eric; Lécuyer, Christophe; Amiot, Romain; Farke, Andrew A. (27 November 2013). "'Terror Birds' (Phorusrhacidae) from the Eocene of Europe Imply Trans-Tethys Dispersal". PLoS ONE. 8 (11): e80357. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...880357A. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080357. PMC 3842325. PMID 24312212.
  143. Sloan, R. E.; Rigby, K.; Van Valen, L. M.; Gabriel, D. (1986). "Gradual dinosaur extinction and simultaneous ungulate radiation in the Hell Creek formation". Science. 232 (4750): 629–633. Bibcode:1986Sci...232..629S. doi:10.1126/science.232.4750.629. PMID 17781415.
  144. Fassett JE, Lucas SG, Zielinski RA, Budahn JR (2001). "Compelling new evidence for Paleocene dinosaurs in the Ojo Alamo Sandstone, San Juan Basin, New Mexico and Colorado, USA" (PDF). Catastrophic Events and Mass Extinctions, Lunar and Planetary Contribution. 1053: 45–46. Bibcode:2001caev.conf.3139F. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 June 2011.
  145. Sullivan, R. M. (2003). "No Paleocene dinosaurs in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico". Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. 35 (5): 15. Archived from the original on 8 April 2011.
  146. Longrich, N. R.; Bhullar, B. S.; Gauthier, J. A. (2012). "Mass extinction of lizards and snakes at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109 (52): 21396–21401. Bibcode:2012PNAS..10921396L. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211526110. PMC 3535637. PMID 23236177.
  147. Head, J. J.; Bloch, J. I.; Moreno-Bernal, J. W.; Rincon, A. F. (2013). Cranial osteology, Body Size, Systematics, and Ecology of the giant Paleocene Snake Titanoboa cerrejonensis. 73nd Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Los Angeles, California. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. pp. 140–141.
  148. MacLeod, N.; Rawson, P. F.; Forey, P. L.; Banner, F. T.; Boudagher-Fadel, M. K.; Bown, P. R.; Burnett, J. A.; Chambers, P.; Culver, S.; Evans, S.E.; Jeffery, C.; Kaminski, M. A.; Lord, A. R.; Milner, A. C.; Milner, A. R.; Morris, N.; Owen, E.; Rosen, B. R.; Smith, A. B.; Taylor, P. D.; Urquhart, E.; Young, J. R. (1997). "The Cretaceous–Tertiary biotic transition". Journal of the Geological Society. 154 (2): 265–292. Bibcode:1997JGSoc.154..265M. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.154.2.0265. Archived from the original on 7 May 2019.
  149. Erickson, B. R. (2007). "Crocodile and Arthropod Tracks from the Late Paleocene Wannagan Creek Fauna of North Dakota, USA". Ichnos. 12 (4): 303–308. doi:10.1080/1042094050031111.
  150. Matsumoto, R.; Evans, S. E. (2010). "Choristoderes and the freshwater assemblages of Laurasia". Journal of Iberian Geology. 36 (2): 253–274. doi:10.5209/rev_JIGE.2010.v36.n2.11.
  151. Weems, R. E. (1988). "Paleocene turtles from the Aquia and Brightseat Formations, with a discussion of their bearing on sea turtle evolution and phylogeny". Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. 101 (1): 109–145.
  152. Novacek, M. J. (1999). "100 Million Years of Land Vertebrate Evolution: The Cretaceous–Early Tertiary Transition". Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 86 (2): 230–258. doi:10.2307/2666178. JSTOR 2666178.
  153. Cadena, E. A.; Ksepka, D. T.; Jaramillo, C. A.; Bloch, J. I. (2012). "New pelomedusoid turtles from the late Palaeocene Cerrejón Formation of Colombia and their implications for phylogeny and body size evolution". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 10 (2): 313. doi:10.1080/14772019.2011.569031.
  154. Sheehan, P. M.; Fastovsky, D. E. (1992). "Major extinctions of land-dwelling vertebrates at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary, Eastern Montana". Geology. 20 (6): 556–560. Bibcode:1992Geo....20..556S. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0556:meoldv>2.3.co;2.
  155. Archibald, J D; Bryant, L J (1990). "Differential Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction of nonmarine vertebrates; evidence from northeastern Montana". In Sharpton, V L; Ward, P D (eds.). Global Catastrophes in Earth History: an Interdisciplinary Conference on Impacts, Volcanism, and Mass Mortality. Geological Society of America, Special Paper. 247. pp. 549–562. doi:10.1130/spe247-p549. ISBN 978-0-8137-2247-4.
  156. Rage, J. (2001). "Oldest Bufonidae (Amphibia, Anura) from the Old World: a bufonid from the Paleocene of France". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 23 (2): 462–463. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2003)023[0462:OBAAFT]2.0.CO;2.
  157. Sibert, E. C.; Norris, R. D. (2015). "New Age of Fishes initiated by the Cretaceous−Paleogene mass extinction". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112 (28): 8537–8542. Bibcode:2015PNAS..112.8537S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1504985112. PMC 4507219. PMID 26124114.
  158. Miya, M.; Friedman, M.; Satoh, T. P. (2013). "Evolutionary origin of the Scombridae (tunas and mackerels): members of a paleogene adaptive radiation with 14 other pelagic fish families". PLOS ONE. 8 (9): e73535. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...873535M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073535. PMC 3762723. PMID 24023883.
  159. Friedman, M. (2010). "Explosive morphological diversification of spiny-finned teleost fishes in the aftermath of the end-Cretaceous extinction". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 277 (1688): 1675–1683. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2177. PMC 2871855. PMID 20133356.
  160. Santini, F.; Carnevale, G.; Sorenson, L. (2015). "First timetree of Sphyraenidae (Percomorpha) reveals a Middle Eocene crown age and an Oligo–Miocene radiation of barracudas". Italian Journal of Zoology. 82 (1): 133–142. doi:10.1080/11250003.2014.962630.
  161. Wilson, A. B.; Orr, J. W. (June 2011). "The evolutionary origins of Syngnathidae: pipefishes and seahorses". Journal of Fish Biology. 78 (6): 1603–1623. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.02988.x. PMID 21651519.
  162. Harrington, R. C.; Faircloth, B. C.; Eytan, R. I.; Smith, W. L.; Near, T. J.; Alfaro, M. E.; Friedman, M. (2016). "Phylogenomic analysis of carangimorph fishes reveals flatfish asymmetry arose in a blink of the evolutionary eye". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 16 (1): 224. doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0786-x. PMC 5073739. PMID 27769164.
  163. Cantalice, K.; Alvarado–Ortega, J. (2016). "Eekaulostomus cuevasae gen. and sp. nov., an ancient armored trumpet fish (Aulostomoidea) from Danian (Paleocene) marine deposits of Belisario Domínguez, Chiapas, southeastern Mexico". Palaeontologia Electronica. 19. doi:10.26879/682.
  164. Near, T. J. (2013). "Phylogeny and tempo of diversification in the superradiation of spiny-rayed fishes". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (31): 12738–12743. Bibcode:2013PNAS..11012738N. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304661110. PMC 3732986. PMID 23858462.
  165. Carnevale, G.; Johnson, G. D. (2015). "A Cretaceous Cusk-Eel (Teleostei, Ophidiiformes) from Italy and the Mesozoic Diversification of Percomorph Fishes". Copeia. 103 (4): 771–791. doi:10.1643/CI-15-236.
  166. Adolfssen, J. S.; Ward, D. J. (2013). "Neoselachians from the Danian (Early Paleocene) of Denmark" (PDF). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 60 (2): 313–338. doi:10.4202/app.2012.0123.
  167. Bazzi, M.; Kear, B. P.; Blom, H.; Ahlberg, P. E.; Campione, N. E. (2018). "Static Dental Disparity and Morphological Turnover in Sharks across the End-Cretaceous Mass Extinction". Current Biology. 28 (16): 2607–2615. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.093. PMID 30078565.
  168. Ehret, D. J.; Ebersole, J. (2014). "Occurrence of the megatoothed sharks (Lamniformes: Otodontidae) in Alabama, USA". PeerJ. 2: e625. doi:10.7717/peerj.625. PMC 4201945. PMID 25332848.
  169. Cavender, T. M. (1998). "Development of the North American Tertiary freshwater fish fauna with a look at parallel trends found in the European record". Italian Journal of Palaeontology. 36 (1): 149–161. doi:10.1080/11250009809386807.
  170. Currano, E. D.; Wilf, P.; Wing, S. C.; Labandeira, C. C.; Lovelock, E. C.; Royer, D. L. (2008). "Sharply increased insect herbivory during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (6): 1960–1964. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708646105. PMC 2538865. PMID 18268338.
  171. Wedmann, S.; Uhl, D.; Lehmann, T.; Garrouste, R.; Nel, A.; Gomez, B.; Smith, K.; Schaal, S. F. K. (2018). "The Konservat-Lagerstätte Menat (Paleocene; France) – an overview and new insights" (PDF). Geologica Acta. 16 (2): 189–213. doi:10.1344/GeologicaActa2018.16.2.5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-11-06. Retrieved 2019-11-06.
  172. Grimaldi, D. A.; Lillegraven, J. A.; Wampler, T. W.; Bookwalter, D.; Shredrinsky, A. (2000). "Amber from Upper Cretaceous through Paleocene strata of the Hanna Basin, Wyoming, with evidence for source and taphonomy of fossil resins". Rocky Mountain Geology. 35 (2): 163–204. doi:10.2113/35.2.163.
  173. Lapolla, J. S.; Barden, P. (2018). "A new aneuretine ant from the Paleocene Paskapoo Formation of Canada" (PDF). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 63 (3): 435–440. doi:10.4202/app.00478.2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 October 2019.
  174. Wilson, E. O.; Hölldobler, B. (2005). "The rise of the ants: A phylogenetic and ecological explanation". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102 (21): 7411–7414. Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.7411W. doi:10.1073/pnas.0502264102. PMC 1140440. PMID 15899976.
  175. Sohn, J.; Labandeira, C. C.; Davis, D. R. (2015). "The fossil record and taphonomy of butterflies and moths (Insecta, Lepidoptera): implications for evolutionary diversity and divergence-time estimates". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 15 (12): 12. doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0290-8. PMC 4326409. PMID 25649001.
  176. ter Hofstede, H. M.; Ratcliffe, J. M. (2016). "Evolutionary escalation: the bat–moth arms race" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Biology. 219 (11): 1589–1902. doi:10.1242/jeb.086686. PMID 27252453.
  177. Rehan, S. M.; Reys, R.; Schwarz, M. P. (2013). "First Evidence for a Massive Extinction Event Affecting Bees Close to the K–T Boundary". PLOS ONE. 8 (10): e76683. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...876683R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076683. PMC 3806776. PMID 24194843.
  178. Dehon, M.; Perrard, A.; Engel, M. S.; Nel, A.; Michez, D. (2017). "Antiquity of cleptoparasitism among bees revealed by morphometric and phylogenetic analysis of a Paleocene fossil nomadine (Hymenoptera: Apidae)". Systematic Entomology. 42 (3): 543–554. doi:10.1111/syen.12230.
  179. Penney, D.; Dunlop, J. A.; Marusik, Y. M. (2012). "Summary statistics for fossil spider species taxonomy". ZooKeys (192): 1–13. doi:10.3897/zookeys.192.3093. PMC 3349058. PMID 22639535.
  180. Hill, D. E.; Richman, D. B. (2009). "The evolution of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae): a review" (PDF). Peckhamia. 75 (1). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-06-29. Retrieved 2019-10-26.
  181. Zhao, Z.; Li, S. (2017). "Extinction vs. Rapid Radiation: The Juxtaposed Evolutionary Histories of Coelotine Spiders Support the Eocene–Oligocene Orogenesis of the Tibetan Plateau". Systematic Biology. 66 (2): 988–1006. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syx042. PMID 28431105.
  182. Grimaldi, D.; Engel, M. S. (2005). Evolution of the insects. Cambridge University Press. p. 640. ISBN 978-0-521-82149-0.
  183. Gallagher, W. B. (1991). "Selective extinction and survival across the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary in the northern Atlantic Coastal Plain". Geology. 19 (10): 967–970. Bibcode:1991Geo....19..967G. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0967:SEASAT>2.3.CO;2.
  184. Sessa, J. A.; Patzkowsky, M. E.; Bralower, T. J. (2009). "The impact of lithification on the diversity, size distribution, and recovery dynamics of marine invertebrate assemblages". Geology. 37 (2): 115–118. Bibcode:2009Geo....37..115S. doi:10.1130/G25286A.1.
  185. Smith, A. B. (2001). "Probing the cassiduloid origins of clypeasteroid echinoids using stratigraphically restricted parsimony analysis". Paleobiology. 27 (2): 392–404. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2001)027<0392:PTCOOC>2.0.CO;2.
  186. Feldmann, R. M.; Tshudy, D. M.; Thomson, M. R. A. (1993). "Late Cretaceous and Paleocene Decapod Crustaceans from James Ross Basin, Antarctic Peninsula". Paleontological Society Memoir. 67 (S28): 1–41. doi:10.1017/S0022336000062077. JSTOR 1315582.
  187. Stanley, Jr., G. D. (2001). "Introduction to Reef Ecosystems and Their Evolution". The History and Sedimentology of Ancient Reef Systems. Topics in Geobiology. 17. Springer Science and Business Media. p. 31. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1219-6_1. ISBN 978-0-306-46467-6.
  188. Zamagni, J.; Mutti, M.; Koŝir, A. (2012). "The evolution of mid Paleocene-early Eocene coral communities: How to survive during rapid global warming" (PDF). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 317–318: 48–65. Bibcode:2012PPP...317...48Z. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.12.010. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2019.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.