What the Constitution Means to Me

Throughout the play, Heidi Schreck communicates her story to the audience through the lens of both herself in the present and of her fifteen-year-old self as a Constitutional debater in 1989.[6][7] Schreck talks about multiple facets of the Constitution throughout the play, but discourse about the Ninth Amendment—which Schreck refers to as the “penumbra” of the Constitution—is central to the show.[8] She also includes a deep dive into the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, which discusses citizenship rights and what it means to be "American".[9] Over the course of the play, Schreck also addresses themes of sexual assault, domestic abuse, and immigration as they relate to the women in her family and to herself. [10] Schreck highlights what she sees as the pitfalls of the Constitution; mainly, she argues that the Constitution doesn't protect all Americans because it was not created to protect all Americans, just wealthy white men.[11] During this part of the play, Mike Iveson moves out of his role of the WWII veteran who attends competitions with young Schreck into his modern self, and shares his experience in regards to his sexuality and experience with the topic of masculinity.[12] The play ends with a dialogue, moderated by Iveson, in which Schreck engages with a local high school debater on whether or not the U.S. Constitution should be abolished.[13] The audience plays the role of the jury in this debate, with one audience member being selected to deliver a final verdict.[13]

What the Constitution Means to Me was first produced at the Wild Project, in Summerworks, Clubbed Thumb's (New York City) festival for new plays in June to July 2017 in a co-production with True Love Productions.[14][15] Schreck was contracted by True Love Productions in their new play commissioning program, writing What the Constitution Means to Me for her submission.[16]

The play was presented at Berkeley Repertory Theatre, California, from May 3, 2018 to June 17, 2018. Schreck starred, with Danny Wolohan as the moderator "Danny", and direction by Oliver Butler.[17][18]

An Off-Broadway production of the play premiered at the New York Theatre Workshop on September 12, 2018 and closed there on November 4, 2018 (in an extension of one week),[19][20] before moving to the Greenwich House on November 27, 2018 where it closed on December 30, 2018.[21] The play was again directed by Oliver Butler, and the cast featured Heidi Schreck, along with Mike Iveson as the moderator, and Rosdely Ciprian and Thursday Williams as the play's featured high school debaters.[22]

A limited Broadway run of the play began on March 14, 2019 in previews at the Hayes Theatre, with the official premiere on March 31. The run was extended to July 21, 2019. Directed again by Oliver Butler, the cast features Heidi Schreck, Mike Iveson, Rosdely Ciprian, Thursday Williams, and Ben Beckley.[1][23] The production's Broadway run was again extended in April 2019 to a final closing date of August 24, 2019.[24]

An engagement of the play, starring Schreck, took place at Washington D.C.’s Kennedy Center (Eisenhower Theater) from September 11, 2019 to September 22, 2019.[25]

The play will run at the Mark Taper Forum, Los Angeles, from January 12, 2020 to February 28, 2020, and then at Chicago's Broadway Playhouse March 4, 2020 to April 12, 2020.[26] The play is then expected to tour in the US, in Charlotte, Hartford, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and others to be announced. This tour will feature a new leading lady, taking the starring role that Schreck has performed.[27] Maria Dizzia will play the main part at the Los Angeles and Chicago venues.[28] The text has been tweaked to reflect the fact that Dizzia is not Heidi, but only playing her.

In an interview with The New York Times journalist Alexis Soloski, Schreck notes that she first thought about generating a play like What the Constitution Means to Me over two decades ago.[29] The first iteration of the play came in the form of a short 10-minute presentation that Schreck performed at benefits nearly ten years after her initial idea for the show.[29] Although the premise of the play is based on Schreck’s own life, she says that she did not initially set out to write a role for her to play.[29] Instead, Schreck’s motives for writing the play include getting Americans to consider contemporary judicial issues through the lens of the Constitution itself, and to provide a grounds for conversation of those issues facing women today.[30] When asked about the concept of victimhood in her play, Schreck notes, “…stories hold our cure.”[7]  Although the play seems to be improvised to a certain degree, Schreck sticks heavily to the letter of her script, adapting occasionally to integrate the most relevant contemporary references.[7]

In reviewing the 2018 Off-Broadway production, Thom Geier of The Wrap wrote: "Schreck is an engaging storyteller with a delivery that seems improvised even when she is sticking to her winding but always-focused script. Again and again, she manages to imbue her exploration of the politics of constitutional rights from the lens of the personal. And of the individuals left out as Americans saw their rights expand."[36]

Critic Sara Holdren writes in New York Magazine that What the Constitution Means to Me is a "...brilliantly crafted show, harrowing and funny and humane, that accesses the political through the deeply personal."[7]

Ben Brantley of The New York Times noted, "More artistic choice could have been taken in the production of the play; but the whirlwind, all-in-one-breath nature of the play echoes the feeling of desperation that permeates Schreck's storylines."[6]

Kyle Smith in National Review provides conservative point of view, writing, "Schreck describes the Constitution the way a Harlequin Romance novelist might describe a night with Fabio: a 'living, warm-blooded, steamy document. ... It is hot and sweaty.' ... The language is instructive: The more you shroud and occlude the plain meaning of the document, the more you claim it to be cloaked in voodoo, the better. That way the actual, brief, lucid charter can be shunted aside in favor of a fantasy document, one that has all of those 'positive rights' liberals wish were guaranteed forever. These rights need to be established by the Constitution because otherwise liberals might have to win them through the ballot box, and that would mean persuading their fellow Americans. It’s much easier to do what this show does: gather a few hundred progressives each night in a Broadway bubble and get them whooping and cheering about everything they have won for themselves in their imaginary Constitution."[37]

• Internet Broadway Database
• Internet Off-Broadway Database