Tank transporter

A tank transporter is a combination of a heavy tractor unit and a mating full trailer or semi-trailer (typically of the lowboy type), used for transporting tanks and other AFVs. Some also function as tank recovery vehicles, the tractors of which may be armored for protection in combat conditions.

British Army M19 Tank Transporter, composed of an M20 tractor unit and M9 semi-trailer loading a Grant tank in North Africa
Antar tank transporter
Oshkosh M1070 tractor unit of the HET heavy equipment and tank transporter system

Used on roads, tank transporters reduce the wear and tear on tracks and the other components of the powertrains of tracked vehicles. They also conserve fuel, are less damaging of road surfaces, and reduce tank crew fatigue. Overall, they are more efficient at moving tanks at higher speeds and longer distances than the tanks themselves.

Chassis designs

Three chassis designs have been used, generally in this order over time as loads became heavier, although there are exceptions.

Rigid chassis

The lighter tanks of World War I and the interwar period were carried on simple rigid flatbed lorries.

Trailers

The A39 Tortoise being towed on a trailer by two Diamond Ts during trials in BAOR, 1948

As the weight of tanks became too great for lorry chassis, separate trailers were developed. These carried the entire weight of the tank on their own wheels, putting no weight onto the tractor unit. They are pulled by a ballast tractor connected to a drawbar.

The simplest trailer designs have only two axles, but heavier loads frequently require more than this. Multiple wheels per axle are common, usually four, sometimes eight.

One advantage of ballast tractors is that they are capable of double heading, where two tractor units are coupled to pull a particularly heavy trailer.

Steering

Some designs, such as the 1928 Aldershot design,[1] grouped pairs of axles at each end of the trailer.

Others, such as the 70-ton Cranes trailer illustrated here beneath the Tortoise had five axles, spaced along the length of the trailer.[2] The end-wheel designs have the advantages of better ability to cross rough ground and steering more easily. Those with axles throughout their length must have suspension that allows the axles to move and also allowing some steering. This makes them more complicated to manufacture. Placing the wheels at the ends also allows the chassis to dip down into a "well", giving a lower centre of gravity during transport. The Cranes trailer had a frame split into two sections of two and three axles, with a carrying bed above them. The outermost four axles had Ackermann steering for their wheels.

The German Sd.Ah.116 trailer of World War 2 (illustrated below) went so far as to have steersman's position on the rear bogie, covered by the canvas tilt just visible in the background of the photograph.

Semi-trailers

Lowboy semi-trailer

The ballast tractor for a drawbar trailer must be comparable in weight to its load if it is to have traction, which means that the total weight of the tractor-trailer combination might be as much as twice the useful load. By using a semi-trailer instead, some of the load's weight is instead carried by the tractor. This avoids the need to ballast the tractor, making a greater proportion of the total weight available for the load.

Semi-trailers cannot be moved on their own, or pushed and pulled by ballast tractors. They are only mobile when connected to the correct tractor unit, which can limit their use in recovery.

The simplest semi-trailer is "half of a trailer", having wheels at the rear only and an articulated connection to the tractor unit. A strong metal post or kingpin on the trailer fits into a socket or fifth wheel on the tractor.

Lowboy semi-trailers are commonly used to keep the load's center of mass low, as they have a low horizontal bed, with a gooseneck that rises up at the front to connect to the tractor unit.

As with drawbar trailers, it is simplest if all the axles of a semi-trailer are concentrated at the rear, away from the tractor unit. However, heavier loads may require more axles, and steering gear may be needed at the front of the semi-trailer.

Loading

Ramps

The simplest means of loading the transporter is with a pair of hinged ramps at the rear. The load then drives up the ramps and onto the trailer under its own power. As tracked vehicles exist for their mobility across obstacles, they usually have no difficulty in doing this (however, see the "Power for loading" section below.)

Tilt beds

The Cranes trailer described above uses an entire see-saw tilting bed (and two small ramps). A manual hydraulic pump tilts the empty bed, bringing the loading end close to the ground. The tank drives up, then once past the see-saw fulcrum the bed tilts back under its weight.

Demountable axles

Loading a StuG III onto a Sd.Ah.116 demountable trailer, 1943

Some designs use a demountable axle, where the axle detaches from the bed of the trailer. Access to the load bed is now through low ramps, without needing to climb over the height of the wheels. Again, the intention is to keep centre of gravity low.

Power for loading

Loading a disabled vehicle on SLT 50 Elefant by pushing with an armoured recovery vehicle of the German Army

Although an operational vehicle can be driven on-board under its own power, this is a delicate operation, particularly with tracked vehicles, as their precise steering is limited. In particular, neutral steering, where one track goes forward and one backward causing the tank to turn on the spot, is likely to either damage the trailer bed or to cause the vehicle to fall off.

A few transporters have been fitted with winches for loading, but this is uncommon.[3] More commonly a disabled vehicle is loaded with the assistance of a recovery tractor, either winching or pushing it on board.

Tank recovery vehicles

Some tank transports are equipped with winches or cranes to also serve as tank recovery vehicles. Some are armoured recovery vehicles. Tanks are usually deployed in groups, with an equal number of transporters to support them. Recovery vehicles are more complex and more expensive and thus only a limited number are produced.

For similar reasons, tank transporters are rarely armoured to recover tanks under fire, although tracked recovery vehicles frequently are. A rare few have been, such as the M26 "Dragon Wagon" of World War II.

Individual models

Truck Model Origins Years in use Users
Scammell Pioneer Semi-trailer UK 1930s-1940s British Army, Indian Army
Mack EXBX 18-ton Tank Transporter USA 1940s French Army,[lower-roman 1] British Army
Diamond T tank transporter USA 1940s-1970s British Army, US Army, Dutch Army, Indian Army
Scammell Commander UK 1986-2002 British Army
Sd.Kfz. 9/18 Ton Heavy Tank Transporter Sd.Ah.116 Germany 1940s German Army
Thorneycroft 'Mighty' Antar UK 1940s-1986 British Army, Dutch Army, Indian Army
Floor Truck Factory Netherlands 1970s-? Dutch Army
Faun SLT 50-3 Elefant and SLT-56 Germany 1970s-? German Army, Polish Army (since 2002)
Faun SLT 56 Franziska with Kässbohrer semi-trailer Germany 1989- German Army
Oshkosh Corporation Commercial Heavy Equipment Transporter (C-HET)- M746 or M911 tractor with M747 semitrailer USA 1970s-1990s US Army
Oshkosh Corporation Heavy Equipment Transport System USA 1993- US Army, British Army (since 2002)
Land Mobility Technologies modified Mercedes-Benz Actros Armoured Heavy Support Vehicle Systems Germany / South Africa 2000s- Canadian Forces - on order 2007 (delivery 2008-2009)
DAF Trucks DAF YTZ95.530 (DAF XF) 95 Tropco tractor and trailer Netherlands 2005- Dutch Army, Canadian Forces - loaded from Dutch (2007-2009)
Type 82 HET - Hanyang Special Auto Works (Hanyang Special Vehicle Works) HY473 tractor and HY962 semi-trailer China 1960s People's Liberation Army
MAZ 537G tank transporter USSR 1960s Soviet Army, Russian Army, Indian Army, People's Liberation Army, Korean People's Army and various other Eastern Bloc nations
KZKT 7428 tank transporter USSR 1980s Soviet Army, Russian Army
Volvo N1233 Sweden 1977- Swedish Army
Scania T144 Sweden 1998- Swedish Army, Belgian Army and French Army
Mitsubishi Fuso Truck and Bus Corporation JGSDF Type 73/74 Heavy Tank Transport Japan 1973- Japan Ground Self-Defense Force

See also

Further reading

  • Baxter, Brian S. (1989). Breakdown: A History of Recovery Vehicles in the British Army. HMSO, for REME Museum. ISBN 0-11-290456-4.

Notes

  1. Note: the French ordered a number of EXBX's but the Fall of France in 1940 before the vehicles could be delivered caused the order to be diverted to Britain.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.