Sure-Tan, Inc. v. NLRB

Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 467 U.S. 883 (1984) is a labor law case that resulted in a split decision before the Supreme Court of the United States.[1] By a 7-2 majority court ruled that undocumented immigrant workers were “employees” covered by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). However, by a 5-4 majority the court ruled that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) was limited in its remedies for penalizing employers who fired undocumented workers for union organizing in violation of the NLRA. The decision was one of a series ruling on the rights of immigrant workers, and was extended by Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB.[2][3][4]

Sure-Tan, Inc. v. NLRB
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued December 6, 1983 Decided June 25, 1984
Full case name	Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Citations	467 U.S. 883 (more) 104 S. Ct. 2803; 81 L. Ed. 2d 732
Argument	Oral argument
Case history
Prior	NLRB v. Sure-Tan, Inc., 672 F.2d 592 (7th Cir. 1982); rehearing denied, 677 F.2d 584 (7th Cir. 1982); cert. granted, 460 U.S. 1021 (1983).
Court membership
Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Associate Justices William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Case opinions
Majority	O'Connor, joined by Burger, White (in full); Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens (Parts I-III); Powell, Rehnquist (Part IV)
Concur/dissent	Brennan, joined by Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens
Concur/dissent	Powell, joined by Rehnquist

Sure-Tan, Inc. was a small leather processing company in Chicago, Illinois. Workers at the company, several of whom were undocumented immigrants from Mexico, voted to unionize in late 1976. Following the NLRB’s certification of the election in January 1977, the company’s owner wrote to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) naming five union supporters who might be undocumented. The company also fired non-immigrant employees who were also union supporters. In February 1977, the INS raided the firm and deported the five workers. The NLRB found the company in violation of the workers’ right to organize, ordered the workers rehired and paid back pay for the lost work from the date of their deportation.

Justice O’Connor delivered the decision for the U.S. Supreme Court, ruling that undocumented workers were fully covered by the NLRA, but that reinstatement and back pay could not be assessed because the workers, having been deported to Mexico, were unavailable for work. Justices Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, and Stevens concurred that undocumented workers are employees under the NLRA, but dissented from back pay portion of the decision, arguing that the NLRB had acted properly. Justices Powell and Rehnquist dissented from the opinion that undocumented workers are employees under the NLRA, but concurred with the decision to deny back pay to deported undocumented workers.