Software diversity

Software diversity is a research field about the comprehension and engineering of diversity in the context of software.

Areas

The different areas of software diversity are discussed in surveys on diversity for fault-tolerance[1] or for security.[2][3] A recent survey emphasizes on the most recent advances in the field.[4]

The main areas are:

Domains

Software can be diversified in most domains:

  • in firmware of embedded systems and sensors[6]
  • in internet applications[7]
  • in mobile applications[8]

Techniques

It is possible to amplify software diversity through automated transformation processes that create synthetic diversity. A "multicompiler" is compiler embedding a diversification engine.[9] A multi-variant execution environment (MVEE) is responsible for selecting the variant to execute and compare the output.[10]

Fred Cohen was among the very early promoters of such an approach. He proposed a series of rewriting and code reordering transformations that aim at producing massive quantities of different versions of operating systems functions.[11] These ideas have been developed over the years and have led to the construction of integrated obfuscation schemes to protect key functions in large software systems.[12]

Another approach to increase software diversity of protection consists in adding randomness in certain core processes, such as memory loading. Randomness implies that all versions of the same program run differently from each other, which in turn creates a diversity of program behaviors. This idea was initially proposed and experimented by Stephanie Forrest and her colleagues.[13]

Recent work on automatic software diversity explores different forms of program transformations that slightly vary the behavior of programs. The goal is to evolve one program into a population of diverse programs that all provide similar services to users, but with a different code.[14][15] This diversity of code enhances the protection of users against one single attack that could crash all programs at the same time.

Transformation operators include:[16]

  • code layout randomization: reorder functions in code
  • globals layout randomization: reorder and pad globals
  • stack variable randomization: reorder variables in each stack frame
  • heap layout randomization

As exploring the space of diverse programs is computationally expensive, finding efficient strategies to conduct this exploration is important. To do so, recent work studies plastic regions in software code[17]: plastic regions are those parts is code more susceptible to be changed without disrupting the functionalities provided by the piece of software. These regions can be specifically targeted by automatic code transformation to create artificial diversity in existing software.


References
  1. Deswarte, Y.; Kanoun, K.; Laprie, J.-C. (July 1998). Diversity against accidental and deliberate faults. Proceedings Computer Security, Dependability, and Assurance: From Needs to Solutions (Cat. No.98EX358). IEEE Comput. Soc. pp. 171–181. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.27.9420. doi:10.1109/csda.1998.798364. ISBN 978-0769503370.
  2. Knight, John C. (2011), "Diversity", Dependable and Historic Computing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6875, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 298–312, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24541-1_23, ISBN 9783642245404
  3. Just, James E.; Cornwell, Mark (2004-10-29). Review and analysis of synthetic diversity for breaking monocultures. ACM. pp. 23–32. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.76.3691. doi:10.1145/1029618.1029623. ISBN 978-1581139709.
  4. Baudry, Benoit; Monperrus, Martin (2015-09-29). "The Multiple Facets of Software Diversity: Recent Developments in Year 2000 and Beyond". ACM Computing Surveys. 48 (1): 16. arXiv:1409.7324. doi:10.1145/2807593. ISSN 0360-0300.
  5. Schaefer, Ina; Rabiser, Rick; Clarke, Dave; Bettini, Lorenzo; Benavides, David; Botterweck, Goetz; Pathak, Animesh; Trujillo, Salvador; Villela, Karina (2012-07-28). "Software diversity: state of the art and perspectives". International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer. 14 (5): 477–495. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.645.1960. doi:10.1007/s10009-012-0253-y. ISSN 1433-2779.
  6. Hosseinzadeh, Shohreh; Rauti, Sampsa; Hyrynsalmi, Sami; Leppanen, Ville (December 2015). Security in the Internet of Things through obfuscation and diversification. 2015 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS). pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/cccs.2015.7374189. ISBN 978-1-4673-9354-6.
  7. Allier, Simon; Barais, Olivier; Baudry, Benoit; Bourcier, Johann; Daubert, Erwan; Fleurey, Franck; Monperrus, Martin; Song, Hui; Tricoire, Maxime (January 2015). "Multitier Diversification in Web-Based Software Applications". IEEE Software. 32 (1): 83–90. doi:10.1109/ms.2014.150.
  8. Franz, Michael (21 September 2010). "E unibus pluram". E unibus pluram: massive-scale software diversity as a defense mechanism. pp. 7–16. doi:10.1145/1900546.1900550. ISBN 9781450304153.
  9. "Protecting Applications with Automated Software Diversity". Galois, Inc. 2018-09-10. Retrieved 2019-02-12.
  10. Coppens, Bart; De Sutter, Bjorn; Volckaert, Stijn (2018-03-01), "Multi-variant execution environments", The Continuing Arms Race: Code-Reuse Attacks and Defenses, ACM, pp. 211–258, doi:10.1145/3129743.3129752, ISBN 9781970001839
  11. Cohen, Frederick B. (1993). "Operating system protection through program evolution" (PDF). Computers & Security. 12 (6): 565–584. doi:10.1016/0167-4048(93)90054-9. ISSN 0167-4048.
  12. Chenxi Wang; Davidson, J.; Hill, J.; Knight, J. (2001). Protection of software-based survivability mechanisms (PDF). Proceedings International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. IEEE Comput. Soc. pp. 193–202. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.1.7416. doi:10.1109/dsn.2001.941405. ISBN 978-0769511016.
  13. Forrest, S.; Somayaji, A.; Ackley, D.H. (1997). Building diverse computer systems (PDF). Proceedings. The Sixth Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems (Cat. No.97TB100133). IEEE Comput. Soc. Press. pp. 67–72. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.131.3961. doi:10.1109/hotos.1997.595185. ISBN 978-0818678349.
  14. Schulte, Eric; Fry, Zachary P.; Fast, Ethan; Weimer, Westley; Forrest, Stephanie (2013-07-28). "Software mutational robustness" (PDF). Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines. 15 (3): 281–312. arXiv:1204.4224. doi:10.1007/s10710-013-9195-8. ISSN 1389-2576.
  15. Baudry, Benoit; Allier, Simon; Monperrus, Martin (2014-07-21). Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis - ISSTA 2014. ACM. pp. 149–159. arXiv:1401.7635. doi:10.1145/2610384.2610415. ISBN 9781450326452. Lay summary.
  16. "Automated Software Diversity: Sometimes More Isn't Merrier". Galois, Inc. 2018-09-10. Retrieved 2019-02-12.
  17. Harrand, Nicolas; Allier, Simon; Rodriguez-Cancio, Marcelino; Monperrus, Martin; Baudry, Benoit (2019-06-25). "A journey among Java neutral program variants". Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines. 20 (4): 531–580. arXiv:1901.02533. doi:10.1007/s10710-019-09355-3. ISSN 1389-2576.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.