Slab detachment

In plate tectonics, slab detachment or slab break-off may occur during continent-continent or arc-continent collisions. When the continental margin of the subducting plate reaches the oceanic trench of the subduction zone, the more buoyant continental crust will in normal circumstances experience only a limited amount of subduction into the asthenosphere. The slab pull forces will, however, still be present and this normally leads to the breaking off or detachment of the descending slab from the rest of the plate.[1] The isostatic response to the detachment of the downgoing slab is rapid uplift. Slab detachment is also followed by the upwelling of relatively hot asthenosphere to fill the gap created, leading in many cases to magmatism.[2]

Schematic depiction of the process of slab detachment. OC=oceanic crust, OLM=oceanic lithospheric mantle, CC=continental crust, CLM=continental lithospheric mantle

The uncritical use of the slab-detachment model to explain disparate observations of magmatism, uplift and exhumation in continental collision zones has been criticised.[3][4]

Slab tears

Detachment initiates at a particular point on the slab and will then propagate laterally along the descending slab, forming a slab tear. The propagation of the detachment will be accompanied by lateral migration of both the associated uplift and the magmatism.[5] Such laterally propagating tears have been recognised from several collision zones, such as the Hindu Kush part of the Himalayan Belt.[6]

References
  1. van Hunen J.; Allen M.B. (2011). "Continental collision and slab break-off: A comparison of 3-D numerical models with observations" (PDF). Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 302 (1–2): 27–37. Bibcode:2011E&PSL.302...27V. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2010.11.035.
  2. Whalen J.B.; McNicoll V.J.; va Staal C.R.; Lissenberg C.J.; Longstaffe F.J.; Jenner G.A.; van Breeman O. (2006). "Spatial, temporal and geochemical characteristics of Silurian collision-zone magmatism, Newfoundland Appalachians: An example of a rapidly evolving magmatic system related to slab break-off". Lithos. 89 (3–4): 377–404. Bibcode:2006Litho..89..377W. doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2005.12.011.
  3. Niu Y. (2017). "Slab breakoff: a causal mechanism or pure convenience?". Science Bulletin. 62 (7): 456–461. doi:10.1016/j.scib.2017.03.015.
  4. Garzanti E.; Radeff G.; Malusà M.G. (2018). "Slab breakoff: A critical appraisal of a geological theory as applied in space and time". Earth-Science Reviews. 177: 303–319. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.11.012.
  5. Wortel M.J.R.; Spakman W. (2000). "Subduction and Slab Detachment in the Mediterranean-Carpathian Region" (PDF). Science. 290 (5498): 1910–1917. Bibcode:2000Sci...290.1910W. doi:10.1126/science.290.5498.1910.
  6. Kufner S.-K.; Schurr B.; Haberland C.; Zhang Y.; Saul J.; Ischuk A.; Oimahmadov I. (2017). "Zooming into the Hindu Kush slab break-off: A rare glimpse on the terminal stage of subduction". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 461: 127–140. Bibcode:2017E&PSL.461..127K. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2016.12.043.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.