Secondary articulation

In phonetics, secondary articulation occurs when the articulation of a consonant is equivalent to the combined articulations of two or three simpler consonants, at least one of which is an approximant. The secondary articulation of such co-articulated consonants is the approximant-like articulation. It "colors" the primary articulation rather than obscuring it. Maledo (2011) defines secondary articulation as the superimposition of lesser stricture upon a primary articulation.

Types of secondary articulation

There are several kinds of secondary articulation supported by the International Phonetic Alphabet.

  • labialization. This is the most frequently encountered secondary articulation. For example, labialized [] has a primary velar plosive articulation, [k], with simultaneous [w]-like rounding of the lips. (Thus the name 'labialization'.) This is in contrast to the doubly articulated labial-velar consonant [k͡p], which is articulated with two overlapping plosive articulations, [k] and [p].
  • palatalization. This is perhaps best known from the Russian "soft" consonants like [tʲ]), which has a primary alveolar plosive articulation, [t], with simultaneous [j]-like (i.e. y-like) raising of the body of the tongue.
  • labio-palatalization. This simultaneous labialization and palatalization. It's found for example in the name Twi.
  • velarization. This is the raising of the back of the tongue toward the velum, as in the English "dark" L, [lˠ].
  • pharyngealization. This is a constriction in the throat (pharynx), as with the Arabic "emphatic" consonants such as [tˤ].
  • glottalization. This involves action of the glottis in addition to the primary articulation of the consonant.

It can sometimes be difficult to distinguish primary and secondary articulation. For example, the alveolo-palatal consonants [ɕ ʑ] are sometimes characterized as a primary articulation of their own and sometimes as palatalization of postalveolar fricatives, [ʃʲ ʒʲ] or [s̠ʲ z̠ʲ].

Transcription

The most common method of transcription in the IPA is to turn the letter corresponding to the secondary articulation into a superscript written after the letter for the primary articulation. For example, the w in is written after the k. This can be misleading, as it iconically suggests that the [k] is released into a [w] sound, analogous to kˡ kⁿ ([k] with a lateral and nasal release), when actually the two articulations of [kʷ] are generally pronounced more-or-less simultaneously. Secondary articulation often has a strong effect on surrounding vowels, and may have an audible realization that precedes the primary consonant, or both precedes and follows it. For example, /akʷa/ will not generally sound simply like [akwa], but may be closer to [awkwa] or even [awka]. For this reason, the IPA symbols for labialization and palatalization were for a time placed under the primary letter (e.g. for [kʷ] and ƫ for [tʲ]), and a number of phoneticians still prefer such unambiguous usage, with and used specifically for off-glides, despite the official policy of the IPA. In the official IPA there remains only an alternative symbol for velarization/pharyngealizaton that is superposed over the primary (e.g. ɫ for dark L), but it has font support for a limited number of consonants and is inadvisable for others, where it can be illegible.

There is a longstanding tradition in the IPA that one may turn any IPA letter into a superscript, and in so doing impart its features to the base consonant. For instance, [ʃˢ] would be an articulation of [ʃ] that has qualities of [s].[1] However, the features are not necessarily imparted as secondary articulation. Superscripts are also used iconically to indicate the onset or release of a consonant, the on-glide or off-glide of a vowel, and fleeting or weak segments. Among other things, these phenomena include pre-nasalization ([ᵐb]), pre-stopping ([ᵖm, ᵗs]), affrication ([tᶴ]), pre-affrication ([ˣk]), trilled, fricative, nasal, and lateral release ([tʳ, tᶿ, dⁿ, dˡ]), rhoticization ([ɑʵ]), and diphthongs ([aᶷ]). So, while ˠ indicates velarization of non-velar consonants, it is also used for fricative release of the velar stop (ɡˠ). Mixed consonant-vowels may indicate a transition: [ᵇa] may be the allophone of /a/ with the transition from /b/ that identifies the consonant, while [fʸ] may be the allophone of /f/ before /y/, or the formants of /y/ anticipated in the /f/.

The 2015 edition of the Extensions to the International Phonetic Alphabet formally advocates superscript letters for the first time since 1989, specifically for the release of plosives.[2]

Unicode support of superscript IPA letters

The customary use of superscript IPA letters, advocated in IPA charts until 1989, is formalized again in the extIPA chart of 2015. However, not all IPA letters are supported by Unicode. The pulmonic consonant letters that are supported as of 2020 are as follows. Letters in grey are not supported. Letters in orange are not directly supported but can be substituted with graphically similar characters.

Pulmonic IPA consonants and hard-coded superscript variants
Bi­labial Labio­dental Dental Alveolar Post­alveolar Retro­flex Palatal Velar Uvular Pharyn­geal Glottal
Nasal m  ɱ  n  ɳ  ɲ  ŋ  ɴ 
Plosive p  b  t  d  ʈ ⁻ ɖ ⁻ c  ɟ  k  ɡ  q ⁻ ɢ   [note 1] ʡ ⁻ ʔ ˀ
Fricative ɸ  β  f  v  θ ᶿ ð  s ˢ z  ʃ 
ɕ ᶝ
ʒ 
ʑ ᶽ
ʂ  ʐ  ç ᶜ̧
[note 2]
ʝ ᶨ x ˣ
(ɧ )
ɣ ˠ χ  ʁ ʶ ħ  ʕ ˁ ⁽ˤ⁾ h ʰ ɦ ʱ
Approximant ʋ ᶹ ɹ ʴ ɻ ʵ j ʲ
(ɥ )
 
(ʍ )
ɰ 
(w ʷ)
Tap/flap ⱱ ⁻ ɾ ⁻ ɽ ⁻
Trill ʙ   [note 1] r ʳ ʀ   [note 1] ʜ 
[note 3]
ʢ ⁻
Lateral fricative ɬ ⁻ ɮ ⁻
Lateral approximant l ˡ
(ɫ ꭞ)
[note 4]
ɭ ᶩ ʎ ⁻ ʟ ᶫ
Lateral tap/flap ɺ ⁻

There are no superscript implosive, click or ExtIPA letters, with the accidental exceptions of ꜝ, ꜞ. Nor are there superscript length marks, though these may be found in print (for example, long aspiration may be transcribed as superscript h followed by superscript ː). The spacing diacritic for ejective consonants, however, works well with superscript letters despite not being superscript itself: ᵖʼ ᵗʼ ᶜʼ ᵏʼ.

Superscript letters can be modified by IPA and extIPA combining diacritics, just as full letters are. For example, a superscript dental nasal is ⁿ̪d̪, a voiceless velar nasal ᵑ̊ǂ, and a coarticulated labial-velar nasal ᵑ͡ᵐb. In a properly designed font, the diacritic will align with the superscript letter. (Spacing diacritics, however, as in , cannot be secondarily superscripted through hard coding: ᵗʲ.)[note 5]

IPA vowels and hard-coded superscript variants
Front Central Back
Close i ⁱ y ʸ ɨ ᶤ ʉ ᶶ ɯ ᵚ u ᵘ
Near-close ɪ ᶦ ʏ ⁻ ᵻ ᶧ ᵿ ⁻ ʊ ᶷ
Close-mid e ᵉ ø ⁻ ɘ ⁻ ɵ ᶱ ɤ ⁻ o ᵒ
Mid ə ᵊ
Open-mid ɛ ᵋ œ ꟹ ɜ ᶟ ɞ ⁻ ʌ ᶺ ɔ ᵓ
Near-open æ ⁽ᵆ⁾
[note 6]
ɶ ⁻ ɐ ᵄ ɑ ᵅ ɒ ᶛ
Open a ᵃ

The precomposed rhotic vowels ɚ ɝ are not supported, but the rhotic spacing diacritic works fairly well on superscript vowels despite not being superscripted itself: ᵊ˞ ᵌ˞ (also ᵋ˞ ᶦ˞ ᵓ˞ ᵅ˞). Combining diacritics work as normal, though in some fonts the nasal tilde for example may be notably wider than the vowel it modifies: ᵓ̃.

See also

Notes

  1.  ,   and   are overscript ɢ, (Cyrillic) в and ʀ that can be combined with a space to imitate a simple superscript, though they may sit higher and be smaller than a true superscript.
  2. Superscript ç is composed of superscript c and a combining cedilla, which should display properly in a good font. Superscript c was specifically requested for this purpose in Unicode proposal L2/03-180.
  3. is a superscript lower-case Cyrillic н, but is also defined as a superscript IPA ʜ. Not all IPA fonts support it.
  4. In Microsoft fonts this character is mistakenly shown as a superscript .
  5. In this instance, the old IPA letter for [tʲ], ƫ, has a supported superscript variant, , but that is not generally the case.
  6. is actually a superscript turned æ, but except at large font sizes the difference is not easily visible.

References

  1. International Phonetic Association (1978). "The International Phonetic Alphabet (Revised to 1979)". Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 8 (1–2). Supplement. JSTOR 44541414.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Reprinted in MacMahon (2010), p. 271.
  2. Ball, Martin J.; Howard, Sara J.; Miller, Kirk (2018). "Revisions to the extIPA chart". Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 48 (2): 155–164. doi:10.1017/S0025100317000147.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.