Royal stars

In astrology, the Royal Stars of Persia are Aldebaran, Regulus, Antares and Fomalhaut. They were regarded as the guardians of the sky in approximately 3000 BCE during the time of the Ancient Persians in the area of modern-day Iran.[1] The Persians believed that the sky was divided into four districts with each district being guarded by one of the four Royal Stars.[2] The stars were believed to hold both good and evil power and the Persians looked upon them for guidance in scientific calculations of the sky, such as the calendar and lunar/solar cycles, and for predictions about the future.

Although there is mention of the Royal Stars influencing the ancient Egyptians in roughly 5,000 BCE, they were noted when the ancient Persian prophet Zarathustra mentioned them in the Bundahishn, the collection of Zoroastrian cosmogony and cosmology, in approximately 1,500 BCE.[3]

History

The four stars with their modern names, and their ancient Persian names (in brackets) were:

  • Aldebaran (Tascheter) vernal equinox (Watcher of the East)
  • Regulus (Venant) summer solstice (Watcher of the North)
  • Antares (Satevis) autumnal equinox (Watcher of the West)
  • Fomalhaut (Haftorang/Hastorang) winter solstice (Watcher of the South)

The four dominant stars have an apparent magnitude1.5 or brighter. The reason why they are called "Royal" is that they appear to stand aside from the other stars in the sky. The four stars, Aldebaran, Regulus, Antares, Fomalhaut, are the brightest stars in their constellations and among the 25brightest stars in the night sky. The Persians considered these stars to be the four guardians of the heavens.[3] They marked the seasonal changes and marked the equinoxes and solstices.

Aldebaran watched the Eastern sky and was the dominant star in the Taurus constellation, Regulus watched the North and was the dominant star in the Leo constellation, Antares watched the West and was the alpha star in Scorpio, and Fomalhaut watched the Southern sky and was the brightest star in Piscis Austrinus (sharing the same longitude with the star Sadalmelik which is the predominant star in Aquarius). Aldebaran marked the vernal equinox and Antares marked the autumnal equinox, while Regulus marked the Summer Solstice and Fomalhaut the Winter Solstice. While watching the sky, the dominant star would appear in its season, each having a time of the year when most noticeable. Regulus was seen as the main star because it was in the constellation of Leo, giving it the power of the lion, signifying the strength of kings with large implications.[4]

The constellations of the Royal Stars were said to be fixed because their positions were close to the four fixed points of the sun's path.[4] The sun was then surrounded by four bright stars at the beginning of every season.[5] From this observation individuals began to denote them the Royal Stars.[5]

By 700 BCE the Nineveh and Assyrians had essentially mapped the ecliptic cycle because of the four stars and were in result able to map the constellations, distinguishing them from the planets and the fixed stars.[4] From this, in 747 BCE the Babylonian King Nabu-nasir adopted a calendar derived from information based on the four stars, one following an eight-year cycle and one a nineteen-year cycle (later adopting the nineteen-year calendar as standard).[6]

The Royal Stars were used primarily for navigation. They were also believed to govern events in the world. Major disasters, breakthroughs, and historical phenomenons were seen as caused by the stars and their alignment in the sky during the time in which the event occurred.[4] When the stars were aligned accordingly, favourable conditions followed, and when they were negatively aligned, disaster was predicted. Because Regulus was the most influential of the Royal Stars, events that took place while Regulus was in dominance were amplified and grave, foreshadowing destruction. Such alignment only makes sense in configuratons including planets and stars and not just fixed stars.

Criticism

The idea there existed four royal stars of Persia was analysed in a 1945 article in Popular Astronomy, where the idea was criticized as largely a relatively modern invention, and / or a misunderstanding of the original source texts.[1]

See also

Further reading

  • Anklesaria, Behramgore Tehmuras (1956). "A translation of the Iranian or Greater Bundahišn". Avesta.org.
  • The so-called Royal Stars of Persia. (1945). George A. Davis, Jr.[1]

References

  1. Davis, George A., Jr. (April 1945). "The so-called Royal Stars of Persia". Popular Astronomy. Bibcode:1945PA.....53..149D.
  2. Stebbins, Joel (August 1943). "The Constant Stars". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 55 (325): 177. Bibcode:1943PASP...55..169S. doi:10.1086/125538. JSTOR 40670025.
  3. Gillentine, Julie. "The Four Royal Stars". Archived from the original on 7 April 2014. Retrieved 30 March 2014.
  4. Bobrick, Benson (2006). The Fated Sky. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
  5. Stokley, James (June 29, 1940). "Summer in the Sky". The Science News-Letter. 37 (26): 407. doi:10.2307/3917059. JSTOR 3917059.
  6. Olmstead, A.T (1948). History of the Persian Empire. Chicago: Phoenix Books. p. 200.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.