Positive energy theorem

In general relativity and differential geometry, the positive energy theorem (more commonly known as the positive mass conjecture) states that, assuming the dominant energy condition, the mass of an asymptotically flat spacetime is non-negative; furthermore, the mass is zero only for Minkowski spacetime. The theorem is a scalar curvature comparison theorem, with asymptotic boundary conditions, and a corresponding statement of geometric rigidity.

Overview

The original proof of the theorem for ADM mass was provided by Richard Schoen and Shing-Tung Yau in 1979 using variational methods and minimal surfaces. Edward Witten gave another proof in 1981 based on the use of spinors, inspired by positive energy theorems in the context of supergravity. An extension of the theorem for the Bondi mass was given by Ludvigsen and James Vickers, Gary Horowitz and Malcolm Perry, and Schoen and Yau.

Gary Gibbons, Stephen Hawking, Horowitz and Perry proved extensions of the theorem to asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes and to Einstein–Maxwell theory. The mass of an asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetime is non-negative and only equal to zero for anti-de Sitter spacetime. In Einstein–Maxwell theory, for a spacetime with electric charge and magnetic charge , the mass of the spacetime satisfies (in Gaussian units)

with equality for the MajumdarPapapetrou extremal black hole solutions.

Formal statements

Schoen and Yau (1979)

Let be an oriented three-dimensional smooth Riemannian manifold-with-boundary with nonnegative scalar curvature and such that each boundary component has positive mean curvature.

Suppose that is an open precompact subset such that there is a diffeomorphism . Suppose that there is a number such that the symmetric 2-tensor on is such that for any , the functions and are all bounded.

  • Then must be nonnegative.

Suppose, as extra conditions, that the functions and are bounded for any

  • If then the boundary of must be empty and must be isometric to with its standard Riemannian metric.

Schoen and Yau (1981)

Let be an oriented three-dimensional smooth complete Riemannian manifold (without boundary). Let be a smooth symmetric 2-tensor on such that

Suppose that is an open precompact subset such that has finitely many connected components and for each there is a diffeomorphism such that the symmetric 2-tensor satisfies the following conditions:

  • and are bounded for all

Also suppose that

  • and are bounded for any
  • and for any
  • is bounded.

The conclusion is that the ADM energy of each defined as

is nonnegative. Furthermore, supposing in addition that

  • and are bounded for any

the assumption that for some implies that , that is diffeomorphic to and that there is a spacelike embedding whose induced metric is and whose second fundamental form is

Witten (1981)

Let be an oriented three-dimensional smooth complete Riemannian manifold (without boundary). Let be a smooth symmetric 2-tensor on such that

Suppose that is an open precompact subset such that has finitely many connected components and for each there is a diffeomorphism such that the symmetric 2-tensor satisfies the following conditions:

  • and are bounded for all
  • and are bounded for all

For each define the ADM energy and linear momentum by

For each consider this as a vector in Minkowski space. Witten's conclusion is that for each it is necessarily a future-pointing non-spacelike vector. If this vector is zero for any then is diffeomorphic to and the maximal globally hyperbolic development of the initial data set has zero curvature.

Extensions and remarks

According to the above statements, Witten's conclusion is stronger than Schoen and Yau's. However, a third paper by Schoen and Yau[1] shows that their 1981 result implies Witten's, retaining only the extra assumption that and are bounded for any It also must be noted that Schoen and Yau's 1981 result relies on their 1979 result, which is proved by contradiction; their extension of their 1981 result is also by contradiction. By contrast, Witten's proof is logically direct, exhibiting the ADM energy directly as a nonnegative quantity. Furthermore, Witten's proof in the case can be extended without much effort to higher-dimensional manifolds, under the topological condition that the manifold admits a spin structure.[2] Schoen and Yau's 1979 result and proof can be extended to the case of any dimension less than eight.[3] More recently, Witten's result, using Schoen and Yau (1981)'s methods, has been extended to the same context.[4] In summary: following Schoen and Yau's methods, the positive energy theorem has been proven in dimension less than eight, while following Witten, it has been proven in any dimension but with a restriction to the setting of spin manifolds.

As of April 2017, Schoen and Yau have released a preprint which proves the general higher-dimensional case in the special case without any restriction on dimension or topology. However, it has not yet (as of May 2020) appeared in an academic journal.

Applications

References

  1. Schoen, Richard; Yau, Shing Tung (1981). "The energy and the linear momentum of space-times in general relativity". Comm. Math. Phys. 79 (1): 47–51.
  2. Bartnik, Robert (1986). "The mass of an asymptotically flat manifold". Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 39 (5): 661–693.
  3. Schoen, Richard M. (1989). "Variational theory for the total scalar curvature functional for Riemannian metrics and related topics". Topics in calculus of variations (Montecatini Terme, 1987). Lecture Notes in Math. 1365, Springer, Berlin: 120–154.
  4. Eichmair, Michael; Huang, Lan-Hsuan; Lee, Dan A.; Schoen, Richard (2016). "The spacetime positive mass theorem in dimensions less than eight". J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS). 18 (1): 83–121.
  • Schoen, Richard; Yau, Shing-Tung (1979). "On the proof of the positive mass conjecture in general relativity". Communications in Mathematical Physics. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 65 (1): 45–76. doi:10.1007/bf01940959. ISSN 0010-3616.
  • Schoen, Richard; Yau, Shing-Tung (1981). "Proof of the positive mass theorem. II". Communications in Mathematical Physics. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 79 (2): 231–260. doi:10.1007/bf01942062. ISSN 0010-3616.
  • Witten, Edward (1981). "A new proof of the positive energy theorem". Communications in Mathematical Physics. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 80 (3): 381–402. doi:10.1007/bf01208277. ISSN 0010-3616.
  • Ludvigsen, M; Vickers, J A G (1981-10-01). "The positivity of the Bondi mass". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. IOP Publishing. 14 (10): L389–L391. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/14/10/002. ISSN 0305-4470.
  • Horowitz, Gary T.; Perry, Malcolm J. (1982-02-08). "Gravitational Energy Cannot Become Negative". Physical Review Letters. American Physical Society (APS). 48 (6): 371–374. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.371. ISSN 0031-9007.
  • Schoen, Richard; Yau, Shing Tung (1982-02-08). "Proof That the Bondi Mass is Positive". Physical Review Letters. American Physical Society (APS). 48 (6): 369–371. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.369. ISSN 0031-9007.
  • Gibbons, G. W.; Hawking, S. W.; Horowitz, G. T.; Perry, M. J. (1983). "Positive mass theorems for black holes". Communications in Mathematical Physics. 88 (3): 295–308. MR 0701918.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.