Newly industrialized country

NICs are countries whose economies have not yet reached a developed country's status but have, in a macroeconomic sense, outpaced their developing counterparts. Such countries are still considered developing nations and only differ from other developing nations in the rate at which an NIC's growth is much higher over a shorter allotted time period compared to other developing nations.[1][2] Another characterization of NICs is that of countries undergoing rapid economic growth (usually export-oriented). Incipient or ongoing industrialization is an important indicator of an NIC. In many NICs, social upheaval can occur as primarily rural, or agricultural, populations migrate to the cities, where the growth of manufacturing concerns and factories can draw many thousands of laborers. NIC's introduce many new immigrants looking to improve their social and or political status through newly formed democracies and the increase in wages that most individuals who partake in such changes would obtain- [3]

Newly industrialized countries can bring about an increase of stabilization in a country's social and economic status, allowing the people living in these nations to begin to experience better living conditions and better lifestyles. Another characteristic that appears in newly industrialized countries is the further development in government structures, such as democracy, the rule of law, and less corruption. Other such examples of a better lifestyle people living in such countries can experience are better transportation, electricity, and better access to water, compared to other developing countries.

The term came into use around 1970, when the Four Asian Tigers[4] of Taiwan,[5][6][7][8] Singapore, Hong Kong and South Korea rose to global dominance in science, technological innovation and economic prosperity as well as NICs in the 1970s and 1980s, with exceptionally fast industrial growth since the 1960s; all four countries having since graduated into high-tech industrialized developed countries with wealthy high-income economies. There is a clear distinction between these countries and the countries now considered NICs. In particular, the combination of an open political process, high GNI per capita, and a thriving, export-oriented economic policy has shown that these East Asian economic tiger countries have now not only reached but surpassed the technological development of the developed countries in Western Europe, Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand and the United States.[5][6][7][8]

All four countries are classified as high-income economies by the World Bank and developed countries by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). All of the Four Asian Tigers, like Western European countries, have a Human Development Index considered "very high" by the United Nations.

The table below presents the list of countries consistently considered NICs by different authors and experts.[9][10][11][12] Turkey and South Africa are classified as developed countries by the CIA.[13] Turkey was a founding member of the OECD in 1961 and Mexico joined in 1994. The G8+5 group is composed of the original G8 members in addition to China, India, Mexico, South Africa and Brazil.

Note: Green-colored cells indicate highest value or best performance in index, while yellow-colored cells indicate the opposite.

Region	Country	GDP (Billions of USD, 2019 IMF)[14]	GDP per capita (USD, 2019 IMF)[15]	GDP (PPP) (Billions of current Int$, 2019 IMF)[16]	GDP per capita (PPP) (current Int$, 2019 IMF)[17]	Income inequality (GINI) 2011–17[18][19]	Human Development Index (HDI, 2018)[20]	Real GDP growth rate as of 2019[21]	Sources
Africa	South Africa	358	6,100	809	13,753	63.0 (2014)	0.705 (high)	0.53	[10][11][12]
North America	Mexico	1,274	10,118	2,627	20,867	45.9 (2018)	0.767 (high)	-0.28	[9][10][11]
South America	Brazil	1,847	8,796	3,456	16,461	53.9 (2018)	0.761 (high)	1.15	[9][10][11]
Asia	China	14,140	10,098	27,308	19,503	38.5 (2016)	0.758 (high)	6.15	[10][11]
	India	2,935	2,171	11,325	8,378	37.8 (2011)	0.647 (medium)	4.85	[10][11][12]
	Indonesia	1,111	4,163	3,737	13,998	39.0 (2018)	0.707 (high)	5.02	[10][11][12]
	Malaysia	365	11,136	1,078	32,880	41.0 (2015)	0.804 (very high)	4.33	[10][11][12]
	Philippines	356	3,294	1,025	9,470	44.4 (2015)	0.712 (high)	5.95	[9][10][11][12][22]
	Thailand	529	7,792	1,383	20,364	36.4 (2018)	0.765 (high)	2.35	[9][10][11][12]
Europe	Turkey	743	8,957	2,346	28,264	41.9 (2018)	0.806 (very high)	0.75	[10][11][12]

For China and India, the immense population of these two countries (each with over 1.2 billion people as of September 2015) means that per capita income will remain low even if either economy surpasses that of the United States in overall GDP. When GDP per capita is calculated according to purchasing power parity (PPP), this takes into account the lower costs of living in each newly industrialized country. GDP per capita typically is an indicator for living standards in a given country as well.[23]

Brazil, China, India, Mexico and South Africa meet annually with the G8 countries to discuss financial topics and climate change, due to their economic importance in today's global market and environmental impact, in a group known as G8+5.[24] This group is expected to expand to G14 by adding Egypt alongside the five aforementioned countries.[25]

NICs usually benefit from comparatively low wage costs, which translates into lower input prices for suppliers. As a result, it is often easier for producers in NICs to outperform and outproduce factories in developed countries, where the cost of living is higher, and trade unions and other organizations have more political sway. This comparative advantage is often criticized by advocates of the fair trade movement.

Critics of NICs argue economic freedom is not always associated with political freedom in countries such as China, pointing out that Internet censorship and human rights violations are common.[27] The case is diametrically opposite for India; while being a liberal democracy throughout after its independence, India has been widely criticized for its inefficient, bureaucratic governance and slow process of structural reform. Thus, while political freedom in China remains limited, the average Chinese citizen enjoys a much higher standard of living than his or her counterpart in India.[28]

South Africa faces an influx of immigrants from countries such as Zimbabwe, although many also come from Burundi, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, Eritrea, Nigeria, Ethiopia and Somalia.[29] While South Africa is considered wealthy on a wealth-per-capita basis, economic inequality is persistent and extreme poverty remains high in the region.[30]

Mexico's economic growth is hampered in some areas by an ongoing drug war.[31]

Other NICs face common problems such as widespread corruption and/or political instability as well as other circumstances that cause them to face the "middle income trap".

• Emerging markets
• Science in newly industrialized countries
• Flying geese paradigm
• Developing country
• Developed country
• North–South divide

Groupings

• BRICS
• G8+5
• G-20 major economies
• G20 developing nations
• BRIC / MINT / Next Eleven
• Emerging and growth-leading economies
• CIVETS
• VISTA