Managed retreat

Managed retreat refers to the purposeful, coordinated movement of people and buildings away from risks. This may involve the movement of a person, infrastructure (e.g., building or road), or community. It can occur in response to a variety of hazards such as flood, wildfire, or drought. In the context of coastal erosion, managed realignment allows an area that was not previously exposed to flooding by the sea to become flooded by removing coastal protection. This process is usually pursued in low-lying estuarine areas and almost always involves flooding of land that has at some point in the past been claimed from the sea.

Tollesbury Managed Realignment site in Essex, the first large scale attempt at salt marsh restoration in the UK

The type of managed retreat depends on the location and type of natural hazard.[1][2][3] In the United Kingdom, managed realignment through removal of flood defences is often a response to sea level rise exacerbated by local subsidence of the land surface due to post-glacial isostatic rebound in the north. In the United States, managed retreat often occurs through voluntary acquisition and demolition or relocation of at-risk properties by the government.[4][5] In the Global South, relocation might occur through government programs.[6] Some low-lying nations, facing inundation due to sea level rise, are planning for the relocation of their populations, such as Kiribati planning for "Migration with Dignity."[7]

Managed realignment

In the United Kingdom the main reason for implementation of managed realignment is generally to improve coastal stability, essentially replacing artificial ‘hard’ coastal defences with natural ‘soft’ coastal landforms (Pethick 2002). According to University of Southampton researchers Matthew M. Linham and Robert J. Nicholls "one of the biggest drawbacks of managed realignment is that the option requires land to be yielded to the sea."[8] One of the benefits, however, is that the process can help protect areas of land further inland by creating natural spaces that act as buffers to absorb water or dampen the force of waves.

Managed realignment has also been used to mitigate for loss of intertidal habitat. Although land reclamation has been an important factor for salt marsh loss in the UK in the past (Allen 1992) the majority of current salt marsh loss in the UK is believed to be due to erosion.[9] This erosion may involve coastal squeeze, where protective sea walls prevent the landward migration of salt marsh in response to sea level rise when sediment supply is limited.[9][10] Salt marshes are protected under the EU Habitats Directive as well as providing habitat for a number of species protected by the Birds Directive (see Natura 2000). Following this guidance, the UK’s biodiversity action plan aims to prevent net losses to the area of salt marsh present in 1992. It is, therefore, a legal requirement that all losses in marsh area must be compensated by replacement habitat with equivalent biological characteristics.[11] This equates to the need to restore approximately 1.4 km² of salt marsh habitat per year in the UK. One of the major reasons cited for the slow pace of current salt marsh restoration in the UK[9] is the uncertainty associated with the practice (Foresight).

There are no agreed protocols on the monitoring of MR sites[12] and, consequently, very few of the sites are being monitored consistently and effectively.[13] Due to the low levels of monitoring there is little evidence on which to base future managed realignment projects. This has led to the results of Managed Realignment schemes being extremely unpredictable.

Relocation programs

Managed retreat in the form of relocation has been used in inland and coastal areas in response to severe flooding and hurricanes. In the United States, this often takes the form of "buyout" programs, in which government acquires and relocates or demolishes at-risk properties.[4][14] In some cases, individual homes are purchased after disasters.[15] In other cases, such as Odamah[16] and Soldiers Grove, Wisconsin,[17] or Valmeyer, Illinois,[18] the entire community has relocated.

Managed retreat can be very controversial.[19] A law suit in Del Mar California brought on by residents was initiated to stop a managed retreat program based on worries that home values, insurance costs and restricted home expansion have been effects of the policy.[20] Some areas included in Managed Retreat are above sea level and are recommended based primarily on estimated engineering costs and by studies financed by the California Coastal Commission itself.[21][22][23]

Despite the controversy, as the costs of climate change adaptation increase, more communities are beginning to consider managed retreat.[24]

Realignment examples
Freiston Shore Managed Realignment site, Lincolnshire

In the UK, the first managed retreat site was an area of 8,000 square metres (86,000 sq ft) at Northey Island in Essex flooded in 1991, followed by larger sites at Tollesbury and Orplands (1995), Freiston Shore (2001) and Abbott's Hall Farm, at Great Wigborough in the Blackwater Estuary, it is one of the largest managed retreat schemes in Europe. It covers nearly 280 hectares (690 acres) of land on the north side of the estuary (2002) and a number of others. The programme was started by the Essex Wildlife Trust (EST) who own Abbott's Hall Farm. They made five breaches in the original old sea wall to allow the held-back sea to flood through to create salt marshland. The marshland over time reverted to its original state before cultivation, providing excellent bird habitat and breeding grounds.[25][26]

See also

References
  1. Greiving, Stefan; Du, Juan; Puntub, Wiriya (7 November 2018). "Managed Retreat — A Strategy for the Mitigation of Disaster Risks with International and Comparative Perspectives". Journal of Extreme Events. 05 (2n03): 1850011. doi:10.1142/S2345737618500112.
  2. Siders, A.R.; Hino, Miyuki; Mach, Katharine J. (23 August 2019). "The case for strategic and managed climate retreat". Science. 365 (6455): 761–763. Bibcode:2019Sci...365..761S. doi:10.1126/science.aax8346. PMID 31439787.
  3. Hino, Miyuki; Field, Christopher B.; Mach, Katharine J. (May 2017). "Managed retreat as a response to natural hazard risk". Nature Climate Change. 7 (5): 364–370. Bibcode:2017NatCC...7..364H. doi:10.1038/nclimate3252.
  4. Mach, Katharine J.; Kraan, Caroline M.; Hino, Miyuki; Siders, A. R.; Johnston, Erica M.; Field, Christopher B. (1 October 2019). "Managed retreat through voluntary buyouts of flood-prone properties". Science Advances. 5 (10): eaax8995. Bibcode:2019SciA....5.8995M. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax8995. PMC 6785245. PMID 31633030.
  5. Siders, A.R. (October 2019). "Managed Retreat in the United States". One Earth. 1 (2): 216–225. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2019.09.008.
  6. Ajibade, Idowu (2 September 2019). "Planned retreat in Global South megacities: disentangling policy, practice, and environmental justice". Climatic Change. 157 (2): 299–317. Bibcode:2019ClCh..157..299A. doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02535-1.
  7. McNamara, Karen E (May 2015). "Cross-border migration with dignity in Kiribati". Forced Migration Review.
  8. Linham, Matthew M.; Nicholls, Robert J. "Managed Realignment". ClimateTechWiki. Retrieved 29 August 2018.
  9. Morris, R. K. A.; Reach, I. S.; Duffy, M. J.; Collins, T. S.; Leafe, R. N. (2004). "On the Loss of Saltmarshes in South-East England and the Relationship with Nereis diversicolor". Journal of Applied Ecology. 41 (4): 787–791. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00932.x. JSTOR 3505709.
  10. Hulme, Philip E. (28 September 2005). "Adapting to climate change: is there scope for ecological management in the face of a global threat?". Journal of Applied Ecology. 42 (5): 784–794. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01082.x.
  11. Crooks et al. 2001
  12. Atkinson, Philip W.; Crooks, Steve; Drewitt, Allan; Grant, Alastair; Rehfisch, Mark M.; Sharpe, John; Tyas, Christopher J. (2004-09-23). "Managed realignment in the UK–the first 5 years of colonization by birds". Ibis (146): 101–110. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00334.x.
  13. Wolters, Mineke; Garbutt, Angus; Bakker, Jan P. (May 2005). "Salt-marsh restoration: evaluating the success of de-embankments in north-west Europe". Biological Conservation. 123 (2): 249–268. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.11.013.
  14. Freudenberg, Robert (2016). Buy-in for buyouts: The case for managed retreat from flood zones. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy. ISBN 978-1-55844-354-9. OCLC 1078995484.
  15. Binder, Sherri Brokopp; Greer, Alex (28 December 2016). "The Devil Is in the Details: Linking Home Buyout Policy, Practice, and Experience After Hurricane Sandy". Politics and Governance. 4 (4): 97. doi:10.17645/pag.v4i4.738.
  16. Hersher, Rebecca (August 15, 2018). "Wisconsin Reservation Offers A Climate Success Story And A Warning". NPR.
  17. FEMA, Village Locals Reflect Moving Was Best Flood Protection
  18. Elam, Stephanie. "A flood forced this town to move. It could be a model for others hit by the climate crisis". CNN.
  19. Koslov, Liz (2 May 2016). "The Case for Retreat". Public Culture. 28 (2 79): 359–387. doi:10.1215/08992363-3427487.
  20. "Del Mar stands firm against 'planned retreat'". San Diego Union-Tribune. 22 May 2018.
  21. Local Assistance Grant Program, California Coastal Commission
  22. San Diego Union Tribune Article "Del Mar stands firm against 'Planned Retreat'"
  23. ESA Cost Benefit Presentation "Cost Benefit Analysis Methodology Overview" slide 24
  24. Gopal, Prashant (September 20, 2019). "America's Great Climate Exodus Is Starting in the Florida Keys". Bloomberg.
  25. Information on Abbott's Hall from Essex Wildlife Trust
  26. Pictures of the Tollesbury and Orplands managed retreat sites
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.