List of small modular reactor designs

Small modular reactors (SMR) are approximately one-third the size of the current nuclear plants (about 350 MWe) or less and have compact and scalable designs which propose to offer a host of safety, construction and economic benefits by offering great potential for lower initial capital investment and scalability.

Summary table

  Design   Licensing   Under construction   Operational   Cancelled   Retired

List of small nuclear reactor designs[1]
Name Gross power (MWe) Type Producer Country Status
4S10–50SFRToshibaJapanDetailed Design
ABV-66–9PWROKBM AfrikantovRussiaDetailed Design
ACP100125PWRChina National Nuclear CorporationChinaDesigned. Build start 2019
ARC-100100SFRARC NuclearCanadaDesign: Vendor design review. [2] One unit approved for construction at Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station in December 2019.[3]
ANGSTREM[4]6LFROKB GidropressRussiaConceptual Design
mPower195PWRBabcock & WilcoxUnited StatesCancelled March 2017 Design (Basic)
BREST-OD-300[5]300LFRAtomenergopromRussiaDetailed Design
BWRX-300[6]300ABWR GE Hitachi Nuclear EnergyUnited StatesLicensing Stage
CAREM27–30PWRCNEAArgentinaUnder Construction
Copenhagen Atomics Waste Burner50MSRCopenhagen AtomicsDenmarkConceptual Design
CMSR100MSRSeaborg TechnologiesDenmarkConceptual Design
EGP-611RBMKIPPE & Teploelektroproekt DesignRussiaOperating
(not actively marketed due to legacy design, will be taken out of operation permanently in 2019)
ELENA[lower-alpha 1]0.068PWRKurchatov InstituteRussiaConceptual Design
Energy Well[7]8.4 MSRcs:Centrum výzkumu Řež[8]CzechiaConceptual Design
Flexblue160PWRAreva TA / DCNS groupFranceConceptual Design
Fuji MSR200MSRInternational Thorium Molten Salt Forum (ITMSF)JapanConceptual Design(?)
GT-MHR285HTGROKBM AfrikantovRussiaConceptual Design Completed
G4M25LFRGen4 EnergyUnited StatesConceptual Design
IMSR400185–192MSRTerrestrial Energy[9]CanadaConceptual Design
TMSR-500500MSRThorCon[10]IndonesiaConceptual Design
IRIS335PWRWestinghouse-ledinternationalDesign (Basic)
KLT-40S35PWROKBM AfrikantovRussiaOperating[11]
MHR-10025–87HTGROKBM AfrikantovRussiaConceptual Design
MHR-T[lower-alpha 2]205.5x4HTGROKBM AfrikantovRussiaConceptual Design
MRX30–100PWRJAERIJapanConceptual Design
NP-300100–300PWRAreva TAFranceConceptual Design
NuScale60LWRNuScale Power LLCUnited StatesLicensing Stage
Nuward300–400PWRconsortiumFranceConceptual Design, construction anticipated in 2030[12]
PBMR-400165HTGREskomSouth AfricaCancelled. Postponed indefinitely[13]
RITM-20050PWROKBM AfrikantovRussiaOperational since October 2019[14]
Rolls-Royce SMR440PWRRolls-RoyceUnited KingdomDesign Stage
SMART100PWRKAERISouth KoreaLicensed
SMR-160160PWRHoltec InternationalUnited StatesConceptual Design
SVBR-100[15][16]100LFROKB GidropressRussiaDetailed Design
SSR-W300–1000MSRMoltex Energy[17]United KingdomConceptual Design
S-PRISM311FBRGE Hitachi Nuclear EnergyUnited States/JapanDetailed Design
TerraPower10TWRIntellectual VenturesUnited StatesConceptual Design
U-Battery4HTGRU-Battery consortium[lower-alpha 3]United KingdomConceptual Design[18]
VBER-300325PWROKBM AfrikantovRussiaLicensing Stage
VK-300250BWRAtomstroyexportRussiaDetailed Design
VVER-300300BWROKB GidropressRussiaConceptual Design
Westinghouse SMR225PWRWestinghouse Electric CompanyUnited StatesDesign: Preliminary Design Completed
Xe-10035HTGRX-energy[19]United StatesConceptual design development
Updated as of 2014. Some reactors are not included in IAEA Report. Not all IAEA reactors are listed yet.
  1. If completed
  2. Multi-unit complex based on the GT-MHR reactor design
  3. Urenco Group

Reactor designs

ACP100

In July 2019 CNNC announced it would start building a demonstration ACP100 SMR by the end of the year at the existing Changjiang Nuclear Power Plant.[20] Design of the ACP100 started in 2010. It is a fully integrated reactor module with an internal coolant system, with a 2 year refuelling interval, producing 385 MWt and about 125 MWe.[21]

ARC-100

The ARC-100 is a 100 MWe sodium cooled, fast-flux, pool-type reactor with metallic fuel based on the 30-year successful operation of the Experimental Breeder Reactor II in Idaho. ARC Nuclear is developing this reactor in Canada, in partnership with GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, with the intent of complementing existing CANDU facilities.[2]

BWRX-300: United States

A scaled-down version of the ESBWR, that eliminates the possibility of large loss-of-coolant accidents, allowing for simpler safety mechanisms.[22] In January 2020, GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy started the regulatory licensing process for the BWRX-300 with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.[23]

CAREM: Argentina

CAREM reactor logo

Developed by the Argentine National Atomic Energy Commission (CNEA) & INVAP, CAREM is a simplified pressurized water reactor (PWR) designed to have electrical output of 100MW or 25MW. It is an integral reactor – the primary system coolant circuit is fully contained within the reactor vessel.

The fuel is uranium oxide with a 235
U
enrichment
of 3.4%. The primary coolant system uses natural circulation, so there are no pumps required, which provides inherent safety against core meltdown, even in accident situations. The integral design also minimizes the risk of loss-of-coolant accidents (LOCA). Annual refueling is required.[24] Currently, the first reactor of the type is being built near the city of Zárate, in the northern part of Buenos Aires province.

Copenhagen Atomics: Denmark

The Copenhagen Atomics Waste Burner is developed by Copenhagen Atomics, a Danish molten salt technology company. The Copenhagen Atomics Waste Burner is a single-fluid, heavy water moderated, fluoride-based, thermal spectrum and autonomously controlled molten salt reactor. This is designed to fit inside of a leak-tight, 40-foot, stainless steel shipping container. The heavy water moderator is thermally insulated from the salt and continuously drained and cooled to below 50 °C. A molten lithium-7 deuteroxide (7LiOD) moderator version is also being researched. The reactor utilizes the thorium fuel cycle using separated plutonium from spent nuclear fuel as the initial fissile load for the first generation of reactors, eventually transitioning to a thorium breeder.[25]

Elysium Industries

Design is called the Molten Chloride Salt, Fast Reactor (MCSFR). Elysium's design is a fast-spectrum reactor meaning the majority of fissions are caused by high-energy (fast) neutrons. This enables conversion of fertile isotopes into energy-producing fuel, efficiently using nuclear fuel, and closing the fuel cycle. In addition, this can enable the reactor to be fuelled with spent nuclear fuel from water reactors.

Encapsulated Nuclear Heat Source (ENHS): United States

ENHS is a liquid metal reactor (LMR) that uses lead (Pb) or lead–bismuth (Pb–Bi) coolant. Pb has a higher boiling point than the other commonly used coolant metal, sodium, and is chemically inert with air and water. The difficulty is finding structural materials that will be compatible with the Pb or Pb–Bi coolant, especially at high temperatures. The ENHS uses natural circulation for the coolant and the turbine steam, eliminating the need for pumps. It is also designed with autonomous control, with a load-following power generation design, and a thermal-to-electrical efficiency of more than 42%. The fuel is either U–Zr or U–Pu–Zr, and can keep the reactor at full power for 15 years before needing to be refueled, with either 239
Pu
at 11% or 235
U
at 13%

It requires on-site storage, at least until it cools enough that the coolant solidifies, making it very resistant to proliferation. However, the reactor vessel weighs 300 tons with the coolant inside, and that can pose some transportation difficulties.[26]

Flibe Energy: United States

Flibe Energy is a US-based company established to design, construct and operate small modular reactors based on liquid fluoride thorium reactor (LFTR) technology (a type of molten salt reactor). The name "Flibe" comes from FLiBe, a Fluoride salt of Lithium and Beryllium, used in LFTRs. Initially 20–50 MW (electric) version will be developed, to be followed by 100 MWe "utility-class reactors" at a later time.[27] Assembly line construction is planned, producing "mobile units that can be dispersed throughout the country where they need to go to generate the power." Initially the company is focusing on producing SMRs to power remote military bases.[28] Flibe has also been proposed for use in a fusion reactor both as a primary coolant and to breed Tritium fuel for D-T reactors.

HTR-PM: China

The HTR-PM is a high-temperature gas-cooled (HTGR) pebble-bed generation IV reactor partly based on the earlier HTR-10 prototype reactor.[29] The reactor unit has a thermal capacity of 250 MW, and two reactors are connected to a single steam turbine to generate 210 MW of electricity.[29]

Hyperion Power Module (HPM): United States

A commercial version of a Los Alamos National Laboratory project, the HPM is a LMR that uses a Pb–Bi coolant. It has an output of 25 MWe, and less than 20% 235
U
enrichment. The reactor is a sealed vessel, which is brought to the site intact and removed intact for refueling at the factory, reducing proliferation dangers. Each module weighs less than 50 tons. It has both active and passive safety features.[30][31]

Integral Molten Salt Reactor (IMSR): Canada

The IMSR is a 33–291 MWe SMR design being developed by Terrestrial Energy[32] based in Mississauga, Canada. The reactor core includes components from two existing designs; the Denatured Molten Salt Reactor (DMSR) and Small Modular Advanced High Temperature Reactor (smAHRT). Both designs are from Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Main design features include neutron moderation from graphite (thermal spectrum) and fuelling by low-enriched uranium dissolved in molten fluoride-based salt. TEI’s goal is to have the IMSR licensed and ready for commercial roll-out by early next decade.[33] It is currently progressing through the Vendor Design Review (VDR) with the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC).[34]

International Reactor Innovative & Secure (IRIS): United States

Developed by an international consortium led by Westinghouse and the nuclear energy research initiative (NERI), IRIS-50 is a modular PWR with a generation capacity of 50MWe. It uses natural circulation for the coolant. The fuel is a uranium oxide with 5% enrichment of 235
U
that can run for five years between refueling. Higher enrichment might lengthen the refueling period, but could pose some licensing problems. Iris is an integral reactor, with a high-pressure containment design.[30][35]

Modified KLT-40: Russia

Based on the design of nuclear power supplies for Russian icebreakers, the modified KLT-40 uses a proven, commercially available PWR system. The coolant system relies on forced circulation of pressurized water during regular operation, although natural convection is usable in emergencies. The fuel may be enriched to above 20%, the limit for low-enriched uranium, which may pose non-proliferation problems. The reactor has an active (requires action) safety system with an emergency feedwater system. Refueling is required every two to three years.[36] The first example is a 21,500 tonne ship, the Akademik Lomonosov launched July 2010. The construction of the Akademik Lomonosov was completed at the St. Petersburg shipyards in April 2018. On 14 September 2019, it arrived to its permanent location in the Chukotka region where it provides heat and electricity, replacing Bilibino Nuclear Power Plant, which also use SMR, of old EGP-6 design, to be shut down.[37] Akademik Lomonosov started operation in December 2019.[11]

mPower: United States

The mPower from Babcock & Wilcox (B&W) is an integrated PWR SMR. The nuclear steam supply systems (NSSS) for the reactor arrive at the site already assembled, and so require very little construction. Each reactor module would produce around 180MWe, and could be linked together to form the equivalent of one large nuclear power plant. B&W has submitted a letter of intent for design approval to the NRC.[38] Babcock & Wilcox announced on February 20, 2013 that they had contracted with the Tennessee Valley Authority to apply for permits to build an mPower small modular reactor at TVA's Clinch River site in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.[39][40]

In March 2017 the development project was terminated, with Bechtel citing the inability to find a utility company that would provide a site for a first reactor and an investor.[41][42]

NuScale: United States

Originally a Department of Energy and Oregon State University project, the NuScale module reactors have been taken over by NuScale Power, Inc. The NuScale is a light water reactor (LWR), with 235
U
fuel enrichment of less than 5%. It has a 2-year refueling period.[43] The modules, however, are exceptionally heavy, each weighing approximately 500 tons. Each module has an electrical output of 60 MWe, and a single NuScale power plant can be scaled from one to 12 modules for a site output of 720 MWe.[43] The company originally hoped to have a plant up and running by 2018.[30][44] More recently it is seeking approval for plans for a plant to start operating in 2026.[45]

Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR): South Africa

The PBMR is a modernized version of a design first proposed in the 1950s and deployed in the 1960s in Germany. It uses spherical fuel elements coated with graphite and silicon carbide filled with up to 10,000 TRISO particles, which contain uranium dioxide (UO
2
) and appropriate passivation and safety layers. The pebbles are then placed into a reactor core, comprising around 450,000 "pebbles". The core's output is 165 MWe. It runs at very high temperatures (900 °C) and uses helium, a noble gas as the primary coolant; helium is used as it does not interact with structural or nuclear materials. Heat can be transferred to steam generators or gas turbines, which can use either Rankine (steam) or Brayton (gas turbine) cycles.[30][46] South Africa terminated funding for the development of the PBMR in 2010 and postponed the project indefinitely[13]); most scientists working on the project have moved abroad to nations such as the United States, Australia, and Canada.[47]

Purdue Novel Modular Reactor (NMR): United States

Based on the Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor designs by General Electric (GE), the NMR is a natural circulation SMR with an electric output of 50 MWe. The NMR has a much shorter Reactor Pressure Vessel compared to conventional BWRs. The coolant steam drives the turbines directly, eliminating the need for a steam generator. It uses natural circulation, so there are no coolant pumps. The reactor has both negative void and negative temperature coefficients . It uses a uranium oxide fuel with 235
U
enrichment of 5%, which doesn’t need to be refueled for 10 years. The double passive safety systems include gravity-driven water injection and containment cavity cooling system to withstand prolonged station blackout in case of severe accidents. The NMR would require temporary on-site storage of spent fuel, and even with the modular design would need significant assembly.[48][49]

Remote Site-Modular Helium Reactor (RS-MHR): United States

Basic schematic of a Gas Cooled Reactor

The RS-MHR is a General Atomics project. It is a helium gas cooled reactor. The reactor is contained in one vessel, with all of the coolant and heat transfer equipment enclosed in a second vessel, attached to the reactor by a single coaxial line for coolant flow. The plant is a four-story, entirely above-ground building with a 10–25 MW electrical output. The helium coolant doesn’t interact with the structural metals or the reaction, and simply removes the heat, even at extremely high temperatures, which allow around 50% efficiency, whereas water-cooled and fossil fuel plants average 30–35%. The fuel is a uranium oxide coated particle fuel with 19.9% enrichment. The particles are pressed into cylindrical fuel elements and inserted into graphite blocks. For a 10MWe plant, there are 57 of these graphite blocks in the reactor. The refueling period is six to eight years. Temporary on-site storage of spent fuel is required. Proliferation risks are fairly low, since there are few graphite blocks and it would be very noticeable if some went missing.[50]

Rolls-Royce SMR

Rolls-Royce is preparing a close-coupled three-loop PWR design, sometimes called the UK SMR.[51] The power output is planned to be 440 MWe, which is above the usual range considered to be a SMR.[52][53] The design targets a 500 day construction time, on a 10 acres (4 ha) site.[51][54] The target cost is £1.8 billion for the fifth unit built.[55]

The consortium developing the design is seeking UK government finance to support further development.[56] In 2017 the UK government provided funding of up to £56 million over three years to support SMR research and development.[57] In 2019 the government committed a further £18 million to the development from its Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund.[58]

Super Safe, Small & Simple (4S): Japan

Toshiba 4S reactor design

Designed by the Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), the 4S is an extremely modular design, fabricated in a factory and requiring very little construction on-site. It is a sodium (Na) cooled reactor, using a U–Zr or U–Pu–Zr fuel. The design relies on a moveable neutron reflector to maintain a steady state power level for anywhere from 10 to 30 years. The liquid metal coolant allows the use of electro-magnetic (EM) pumps, with natural circulation used in emergencies.[30][59]

Stable Salt Reactor (SSR): United Kingdom

The Stable salt reactor (SSR) is a nuclear reactor design proposed by Moltex Energy.[60] It represents a breakthrough in molten salt reactor technology, with the potential to make nuclear power safer, cheaper and cleaner. The modular nature of the design, including reactor core and non-nuclear buildings, allows rapid deployment on a large scale. The design uses static fuel salt in conventional fuel assemblies thus avoiding many of the challenges associated with pumping a highly radioactive fluid and simultaneously complies with many pre-existing international standards. Materials challenges are also greatly reduced through the use of standard nuclear certified steel, with minimal risk of corrosion.

The SSR wasteburning variant SSR-W, rated at 300MWe, is currently progressing through the Vendor Design Review (VDR) with the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC).[34]

Traveling Wave Reactor (TWR): United States

The TWR from Intellectual Ventures' TerraPower team is another innovative reactor design. It is based on the idea of a fission chain reaction moving through a core in a "wave". The idea is that the slow breeding and burning of fuel would move through the core for 50 to 100 years without needing to be stopped, so long as plenty of fertile 238
U
is supplied. The only enriched 235
U
required would be a thin layer to start the chain reaction. So far, the reactor only exists in theory, the only testing done with computer simulations. A large reactor concept has been designed, but the small modular design is still being conceptualized.[61]

Westinghouse SMR

The Westinghouse SMR design is a scaled down version of the AP1000 reactor, designed to generate 225 MWe.

After losing a second time in December 2013 for funding through the U.S. Department of Energy's SMR commercialization program, and citing "no customers" for SMR technology, Westinghouse announced in January 2014 that it is backing off from further development of the company's SMR. Westinghouse staff devoted to SMR development was "reprioritized" to the company's AP1000.[62]

See also

References

  1. "IAEA Report" (PDF).
  2. "ARC-100 passes Canadian pre-licensing milestone". World Nuclear News. 2 October 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
  3. "N.B. makes step forward on second nuclear reactor at Point Lepreau". Atlantic. 2019-12-09. Retrieved 2020-01-19.
  4. "The ANGSTREM Project: Present Status and Development Activities" (PDF). Retrieved 22 June 2017.
  5. "Error" (PDF).
  6. https://nuclear.gepower.com/build-a-plant/products/nuclear-power-plants-overview/bwrx-300 INTRODUCING THE BWRX-300
  7. https://www.tespo-eng.cz/images/zpravy/24-21-rocnik-konference-technologie-pro-elektrarny-a-teplarny-na-tuha-paliva-minulosti/Medlov_FHR_vl.pdf
  8. Návrh malého modulárního reaktoru byl představen veřejnosti, 19.2.2018
  9. "Terrestrial Energy | Integral Molten Salt Reactor Technology". Terrestrial Energy. Retrieved 2016-11-12.
  10. "ThorCon | Thorium Molten Salt Reactor". ThorCon Power. Retrieved 2020-01-07.
  11. "Russia connects floating plant to grid". World Nuclear News. 2019-12-19. Retrieved 2019-12-20.
  12. "French-developed SMR design unveiled". World Nuclear News. 17 September 2019. Retrieved 18 September 2019.
  13. http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-PBMR_postponed-1109092.html World Nuclear News 11 September 2009
  14. "SMR in the Making". Retrieved 2020-05-05.
  15. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-10-11. Retrieved 2014-10-07.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  16. http://www.iaea.org/NuclearPower/Downloadable/Meetings/2011/2011-07-04-07-08-WS-NPTD/2_RUSSIA_SVBR_AKME-eng_Antysheva.pdf
  17. "Moltex Energy | Safer Cheaper Cleaner Nuclear | Stable Salt Reactors | SSR". moltexenergy.com. Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  18. Onstad, Eric (8 Feb 2013). "Nuclear fuel firm champions "plug-and-play" micro reactors". Reuters. Retrieved 3 April 2016.
  19. "Energy Department Announces New Investments in Advanced Nuclear Power Reactors..." US Department of Energy. Retrieved 16 January 2016.
  20. "CNNC launches demonstration SMR project". World Nuclear News. 22 July 2019. Retrieved 22 July 2019.
  21. "Specific Design Consideration of ACP100 for Application in the Middle East and North Africa Region" (PDF). CNNC. 2 October 2017. Retrieved 22 July 2019.
  22. "BWRX-300". nuclear.gepower.com.
  23. "GE Hitachi initiates US licensing of BWRX-300". World Nuclear News. 31 January 2020. Retrieved 31 January 2020.
  24. Report to Congress 2001, pp. 20–22
  25. "Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments" (PDF). International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Retrieved 22 December 2019.
  26. Report to Congress 2001, pp. 22–24
  27. Sorensen, Kirk (4 October 2011). "Flibe Energy in the UK, Part 4: DECC — The Energy From Thorium Foundation". Energyfromthorium.com. Retrieved 2012-12-18.
  28. James J Puplava (2012-12-14). "Kirk Sorensen: Thorium Could Be Our Energy "Silver Bullet" Safer, cleaner and cheaper thorium reactors could change the world". Financial Sense. Retrieved 2012-12-18.
  29. Zhang, Zuoyi; Dong, Yujie; Li, Fu; Zhang, Zhengming; Wang, Haitao; Huang, Xiaojin; Li, Hong; Liu, Bing; Wu, Xinxin; Wang, Hong; Diao, Xingzhong; Zhang, Haiquan; Wang, Jinhua (March 2016). "The Shandong Shidao Bay 200 MW e High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Pebble-Bed Module (HTR-PM) Demonstration Power Plant: An Engineering and Technological Innovation". Engineering. 2 (1): 112–118. doi:10.1016/J.ENG.2016.01.020.
  30. Advanced Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
  31. "A New Paradigm for Power Generation", Hyperion Power Generation Archived 2010-06-19 at the Wayback Machine
  32. "Home". Terrestrial Energy.
  33. "The-weinberg-foundation.org". www.the-weinberg-foundation.org.
  34. "CNSC Vendor Design Review".
  35. Report to Congress 2001, pp. 24–25
  36. Report to Congress 2001, pp. 25–27
  37. "Russia's first sea-borne nuclear power plant arrives to its base". Reuters. 2019-09-14. Retrieved 2019-09-15.
  38. "Modern Nuclear Reactors", The Babcock & Wilcox Company
  39. "B&W, TVA Sign Contract for Clinch River mPower Construction Permit". Charlotte, NC: Babcock & Wilcox. February 20, 2013. Archived from the original (press release) on March 30, 2013. Retrieved February 20, 2013.
  40. Matthew L. Wald (February 20, 2013). "Deal Advances Development of a Smaller Nuclear Reactor". The New York Times. Retrieved February 21, 2013.
  41. Adams, Rod (13 March 2017). "Bechtel And BWXT Quietly Terminate mPower Reactor Project". Forbes. Retrieved 23 March 2017.
  42. Carmel, Margaret (15 March 2017). "BWXT, Bechtel shelve mPower program". Roanoke Times. Retrieved 23 March 2017.
  43. "How the NuScale module works". NuScale Power. Retrieved 2019-12-26.
  44. "Overview of NuScale Technology", NuScale Power
  45. Geoff Brumfiel (13 January 2017). "Miniaturized Nuclear Power Plant? U.S. Reviewing Proposed Design".
  46. "PBMR Technology", Pebble Bed Modular Reactor Ltd. Archived 2005-10-30 at the Wayback Machine
  47. Campbell, K. (21 June 2010). "Solidarity union reports last rites for the PBMR". engineeringnews.co.za (Engineering News Online).
  48. Report to Congress 2001, pp. 29–30
  49. "Global Energy Crisis and Renaissance of Nuclear Engineering", p. 30. 2009 Hawkins Memorial Lecture, Mamoru Ishii, School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University
  50. Report to Congress 2001, pp. 30–33
  51. UK SMR (PDF) (Report). Rolls-Royce. 2017. Retrieved 2 December 2019.
  52. "Rolls-Royce elaborates on its SMR plans". World Nuclear News. 13 June 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
  53. UK SMR: A National Endeavour (PDF) (Report). Rolls-Royce. 2017. Retrieved 15 December 2017.
  54. Paige, Jessica (24 January 2020). "Rolls-Royce leads consortium to build small nuclear reactors in the UK". POWER. Retrieved 28 February 2020.
  55. "UK confirms funding for Rolls-Royce SMR". World Nuclear News. 7 November 2019. Retrieved 8 November 2019.
  56. "UK SMR consortium calls for government support". World Nuclear News. 12 September 2017. Retrieved 15 December 2017.
  57. "UK government announces support for nuclear innovation". Nuclear Engineering International. 11 December 2017. Retrieved 15 December 2017.
  58. "UK commits funding to Rolls-Royce SMR". World Nuclear News. 23 July 2019. Retrieved 24 July 2019.
  59. Report to Congress 2001, pp. 36–37
  60. "An Introduction to the Moltex Energy Portfolio" (PDF).
  61. "Introducing Traveling-Wave Reactors", Intellectual Ventures
  62. "Westinghouse backs off small nuclear plants". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.