Faulhaber's formula

Faulhaber's formula is also called Bernoulli's formula. Faulhaber did not know the properties of the coefficients discovered by Bernoulli. Rather, he knew at least the first 17 cases, as well as the existence of the Faulhaber polynomials for odd powers described below.[1]

A rigorous proof of these formulas and his assertion that such formulas would exist for all odd powers took until Carl Jacobi (1834).

The term Faulhaber polynomials is used by some authors to refer to something other than the polynomial sequence given above. Faulhaber observed that if p is odd, then

${\displaystyle 1^{p}+2^{p}+3^{p}+\cdots +n^{p}}$

is a polynomial function of

${\displaystyle a=1+2+3+\cdots +n={\frac {n(n+1)}{2}}.}$

In particular:

${\displaystyle 1^{3}+2^{3}+3^{3}+\cdots +n^{3}=a^{2};}$ OEIS: A000537

${\displaystyle 1^{5}+2^{5}+3^{5}+\cdots +n^{5}={4a^{3}-a^{2} \over 3};}$ OEIS: A000539

${\displaystyle 1^{7}+2^{7}+3^{7}+\cdots +n^{7}={6a^{4}-4a^{3}+a^{2} \over 3};}$ OEIS: A000541

${\displaystyle 1^{9}+2^{9}+3^{9}+\cdots +n^{9}={16a^{5}-20a^{4}+12a^{3}-3a^{2} \over 5};}$ OEIS: A007487

${\displaystyle 1^{11}+2^{11}+3^{11}+\cdots +n^{11}={16a^{6}-32a^{5}+34a^{4}-20a^{3}+5a^{2} \over 3}.}$ OEIS: A123095

The first of these identities (the case p = 3) is known as Nicomachus's theorem.

More generally,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}1^{2m+1}+2^{2m+1}&+3^{2m+1}+\cdots +n^{2m+1}\\&={\frac {1}{2^{2m+2}(2m+2)}}\sum _{q=0}^{m}{\binom {2m+2}{2q}}(2-2^{2q})~B_{2q}~\left[(8a+1)^{m+1-q}-1\right].\end{aligned}}}$

Some authors call the polynomials in a on the right-hand sides of these identities Faulhaber polynomials. These polynomials are divisible by a² because the Bernoulli number B_j is 0 for j > 1 odd.

Faulhaber also knew that if a sum for an odd power is given by

${\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}k^{2m+1}=c_{1}a^{2}+c_{2}a^{3}+\cdots +c_{m}a^{m+1}}$

then the sum for the even power just below is given by

${\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}k^{2m}={\frac {n+1/2}{2m+1}}(2c_{1}a+3c_{2}a^{2}+\cdots +(m+1)c_{m}a^{m}).}$

Note that the polynomial in parentheses is the derivative of the polynomial above with respect to a.

Since a = n(n + 1)/2, these formulae show that for an odd power (greater than 1), the sum is a polynomial in n having factors n² and (n + 1)², while for an even power the polynomial has factors n, n + ½ and n + 1.

Jakob Bernoulli's Summae Potestatum, Ars Conjectandi, 1713

In 1713, Jacob Bernoulli published under the title Summae Potestatum an expression of the sum of the p powers of the n first integers as a (p + 1)th-degree polynomial function of n, with coefficients involving numbers B_j, now called Bernoulli numbers:

${\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}k^{p}={\frac {n^{p+1}}{p+1}}+{\frac {1}{2}}n^{p}+\sum _{j=2}^{p}{p+1 \choose j}B_{j}n^{p+1-j}.}$

Introducing also the first two Bernoulli numbers (which Bernoulli did not), the previous formula becomes

${\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}k^{p}={1 \over p+1}\sum _{j=0}^{p}{p+1 \choose j}B_{j}n^{p+1-j},}$

using the Bernoulli number of the second kind for which ${\displaystyle B_{1}={\frac {1}{2}}}$, or

${\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}k^{p}={1 \over p+1}\sum _{j=0}^{p}(-1)^{j}{p+1 \choose j}B_{j}n^{p+1-j},}$

using the Bernoulli number of the first kind for which ${\displaystyle B_{1}=-{\frac {1}{2}}.}$

For example, as

${\displaystyle B_{0}=1,~B_{1}=1/2,~B_{2}=1/6,~B_{3}=0,~B_{4}=-1/30,}$

one has for p = 4,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}1^{4}+2^{4}+3^{4}+\cdots +n^{4}&={1 \over 5}\sum _{j=0}^{4}{5 \choose j}B_{j}n^{5-j}\\&={1 \over 5}\left(B_{0}n^{5}+5B_{1}n^{4}+10B_{2}n^{3}+10B_{3}n^{2}+5B_{4}n\right)\\&={\frac {1}{5}}n^{5}+{\frac {1}{2}}n^{4}+{\frac {1}{3}}n^{3}-{\frac {1}{30}}n.\end{aligned}}}$

Faulhaber himself did not know the formula in this form, but only computed the first seventeen polynomials; the general form was established with the discovery of the Bernoulli numbers (see History section). The derivation of Faulhaber's formula is available in The Book of Numbers by John Horton Conway and Richard K. Guy.[2]

There is also a similar (but somehow simpler) expression: using the idea of telescoping and the binomial theorem, one gets Pascal's identity:[3]

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}(n+1)^{k+1}-1&=\sum _{m=1}^{n}\left((m+1)^{k+1}-m^{k+1}\right)\\&=\sum _{p=0}^{k}{\binom {k+1}{p}}(1^{p}+2^{p}+\dots +n^{p}).\end{aligned}}}$

This in particular yields the examples below – e.g., take k = 1 to get the first example.

${\displaystyle 1+2+3+\cdots +n={\frac {n(n+1)}{2}}={\frac {n^{2}+n}{2}}}$ (the triangular numbers)

${\displaystyle 1^{2}+2^{2}+3^{2}+\cdots +n^{2}={\frac {n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}}={\frac {2n^{3}+3n^{2}+n}{6}}}$ (the square pyramidal numbers)

${\displaystyle 1^{3}+2^{3}+3^{3}+\cdots +n^{3}=\left[{\frac {n(n+1)}{2}}\right]^{2}={\frac {n^{4}+2n^{3}+n^{2}}{4}}}$ (the triangular numbers squared)

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}1^{4}+2^{4}+3^{4}+\cdots +n^{4}&={\frac {n(n+1)(2n+1)(3n^{2}+3n-1)}{30}}\\&={\frac {6n^{5}+15n^{4}+10n^{3}-n}{30}}\end{aligned}}}$

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}1^{5}+2^{5}+3^{5}+\cdots +n^{5}&={\frac {[n(n+1)]^{2}(2n^{2}+2n-1)}{12}}\\&={\frac {2n^{6}+6n^{5}+5n^{4}-n^{2}}{12}}\end{aligned}}}$

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}1^{6}+2^{6}+3^{6}+\cdots +n^{6}&={\frac {n(n+1)(2n+1)(3n^{4}+6n^{3}-3n+1)}{42}}\\&={\frac {6n^{7}+21n^{6}+21n^{5}-7n^{3}+n}{42}}\end{aligned}}}$

From the previous examples we get:

${\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{0}=n}$

${\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{1}={1 \over 2}n+{1 \over 2}n^{2}}$

${\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{2}={1 \over 6}n+{1 \over 2}n^{2}+{1 \over 3}n^{3}}$

${\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{3}={1 \over 4}n^{2}+{1 \over 2}n^{3}+{1 \over 4}n^{4}}$

${\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{4}=-{1 \over 30}n+{1 \over 3}n^{3}+{1 \over 2}n^{4}+{1 \over 5}n^{5}}$

${\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{5}=-{1 \over 12}n^{2}+{5 \over 12}n^{4}+{1 \over 2}n^{5}+{1 \over 6}n^{6}}$

${\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{6}={1 \over 42}n-{1 \over 6}n^{3}+{1 \over 2}n^{5}+{1 \over 2}n^{6}+{1 \over 7}n^{7}}$

Writing these polynomials as a product between matrices gives

${\displaystyle {\begin{pmatrix}\sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{0}\\\sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{1}\\\sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{2}\\\sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{3}\\\sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{4}\\\sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{5}\\\sum _{i=1}^{n}i^{6}\\\end{pmatrix}}=G_{7}\cdot {\begin{pmatrix}n\\n^{2}\\n^{3}\\n^{4}\\n^{5}\\n^{6}\\n^{7}\\\end{pmatrix}}\qquad {\text{where}}\qquad G_{7}={\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0&0&0&0&0\\{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 2}&0&0&0&0&0\\{1 \over 6}&{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 3}&0&0&0&0\\0&{1 \over 4}&{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 4}&0&0&0\\-{1 \over 30}&0&{1 \over 3}&{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 5}&0&0\\0&-{1 \over 12}&0&{5 \over 12}&{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 6}&0\\{1 \over 42}&0&-{1 \over 6}&0&{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 7}\\\end{pmatrix}}}$

Surprisingly, inverting the matrix of polynomial coefficients yields something more familiar:

${\displaystyle G_{7}^{-1}={\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0&0&0&0&0\\-1&2&0&0&0&0&0\\1&-3&3&0&0&0&0\\-1&4&-6&4&0&0&0\\1&-5&10&-10&5&0&0\\-1&6&-15&20&-15&6&0\\1&-7&21&-35&35&-21&7\\\end{pmatrix}}}$

In the inverted matrix, Pascal's triangle can be recognized, without the last element of each line, and with alternate signs. More precisely, let ${\displaystyle A_{7}}$ be the lower triangular Pascal matrix:

${\displaystyle A_{7}={\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0&0&0&0&0\\1&2&0&0&0&0&0\\1&3&3&0&0&0&0\\1&4&6&4&0&0&0\\1&5&10&10&5&0&0\\1&6&15&20&15&6&0\\1&7&21&35&35&21&7\\\end{pmatrix}}}$

Let ${\displaystyle {\overline {A}}_{7}}$ be the matrix obtained from ${\displaystyle A_{7}}$ by changing the signs of the entries in odd diagonals, that is by replacing ${\displaystyle a_{i,j}}$ by ${\displaystyle (-1)^{i+j}a_{i,j}}$. Then

${\displaystyle G_{7}^{-1}={\overline {A}}_{7}.}$

This is true for every order,[4] that is, for each positive integer m, one has ${\displaystyle G_{m}^{-1}={\overline {A}}_{m}.}$ Thus, it is possible to obtain the coefficients of the polynomials of the sums of powers of successive integers without resorting to the numbers of Bernoulli but by inverting the matrix easily obtained from the triangle of Pascal.

One has also[5]

${\displaystyle A_{7}^{-1}={\overline {G}}_{7}={\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0&0&0&0&0\\{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 2}&0&0&0&0&0\\{1 \over 6}&{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 3}&0&0&0&0\\0&{1 \over 4}&{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 4}&0&0&0\\{1 \over 30}&0&{1 \over 3}&{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 5}&0&0\\0&{1 \over 12}&0&{5 \over 12}&{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 6}&0\\{1 \over 42}&0&{1 \over 6}&0&{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 2}&{1 \over 7}\end{pmatrix}},}$

where ${\displaystyle {\overline {G}}_{7}}$ is obtained from ${\displaystyle G_{7}}$ by removing the minus signs.

Let

${\displaystyle S_{p}(n)=\sum _{k=1}^{n}k^{p},}$

denote the sum under consideration for integer ${\displaystyle p\geq 0.}$

Define the following exponential generating function with (initially) indeterminate ${\displaystyle z}$

${\displaystyle G(z,n)=\sum _{p=0}^{\infty }S_{p}(n){\frac {1}{p!}}z^{p}.}$

We find

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}G(z,n)=&\sum _{p=0}^{\infty }\sum _{k=1}^{n}{\frac {1}{p!}}(kz)^{p}=\sum _{k=1}^{n}e^{kz}=e^{z}.{\frac {1-e^{nz}}{1-e^{z}}},\\=&{\frac {1-e^{nz}}{e^{-z}-1}}.\end{aligned}}}$

This is an entire function in ${\displaystyle z}$ so that ${\displaystyle z}$ can be taken to be any complex number.

We next recall the exponential generating function for the Bernoulli polynomials ${\displaystyle B_{j}(x)}$

${\displaystyle {\frac {ze^{zx}}{e^{z}-1}}=\sum _{j=0}^{\infty }B_{j}(x){\frac {z^{j}}{j!}},}$

where ${\displaystyle B_{j}=B_{j}(0)}$ denotes the Bernoulli number (with the convention ${\displaystyle B_{1}=-{\frac {1}{2}}}$). We obtain the Faulhaber formula by expanding the generating function as follows:

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}G(z,n)=&\sum _{j=0}^{\infty }B_{j}{\frac {(-z)^{j-1}}{j!}}\left(-\sum _{l=1}^{\infty }{\frac {(nz)^{l}}{l!}}\right)\\=&\sum _{p=0}^{\infty }z^{p}\sum _{j=0}^{p}(-1)^{j}{\frac {1}{j!(p+1-j)!}}B_{j}n^{p+1-j}\\=&\sum _{p=0}^{\infty }{\frac {z^{p}}{p!}}{1 \over p+1}\sum _{j=0}^{p}(-1)^{j}{p+1 \choose j}B_{j}n^{p+1-j},\\{\mbox{i.e.}}\quad \sum _{k=1}^{n}k^{p}=&{1 \over p+1}\sum _{j=0}^{p}(-1)^{j}{p+1 \choose j}B_{j}n^{p+1-j}.\end{aligned}}}$

Note that ${\displaystyle B_{j}=0}$ for all odd ${\displaystyle j>1}$. Hence some authors define ${\displaystyle B_{1}={\frac {1}{2}}}$ so that the alternating factor ${\displaystyle (-1)^{j}}$ is absent.

By relabelling we find the alternative expression

${\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}k^{p}=\sum _{k=0}^{p}{(-1)^{p-k} \over k+1}{p \choose k}B_{p-k}n^{k+1}.}$

We may also expand ${\displaystyle G(z,n)}$ in terms of the Bernoulli polynomials to find

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}G(z,n)=&{\frac {e^{(n+1)z}}{e^{z}-1}}-{\frac {e^{z}}{e^{z}-1}}\\=&\sum _{j=0}^{\infty }\left(B_{j}(n+1)-(-1)^{j}B_{j}\right){\frac {z^{j-1}}{j!}},\end{aligned}}}$

which implies

${\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}k^{p}={\frac {1}{p+1}}\left(B_{p+1}(n+1)-(-1)^{p+1}B_{p+1}\right)={\frac {1}{p+1}}\left(B_{p+1}(n+1)-B_{p+1}(1)\right).}$

Since ${\displaystyle B_{n}=0}$ whenever ${\displaystyle n>1}$ is odd, the factor ${\displaystyle (-1)^{p+1}}$ may be removed when ${\displaystyle p>0}$.

Using ${\displaystyle B_{k}=-k\zeta (1-k)}$, one can write

${\displaystyle \sum \limits _{k=1}^{n}k^{p}={\frac {n^{p+1}}{p+1}}-\sum \limits _{j=0}^{p-1}{p \choose j}\zeta (-j)n^{p-j}.}$

If we consider the generating function ${\displaystyle G(z,n)}$ in the large ${\displaystyle n}$ limit for ${\displaystyle \Re (z)<0}$, then we find

${\displaystyle \lim _{n\rightarrow \infty }G(z,n)={\frac {1}{e^{-z}-1}}=\sum _{j=0}^{\infty }(-1)^{j-1}B_{j}{\frac {z^{j-1}}{j!}}}$

Heuristically, this suggests that

${\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{\infty }k^{p}={\frac {(-1)^{p}B_{p+1}}{p+1}}.}$

This result agrees with the value of the Riemann zeta function ${\displaystyle \zeta (s)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{n^{s}}}}$ for negative integers ${\displaystyle s=-p<0}$ on appropriately analytically continuing ${\displaystyle \zeta (s)}$.

In the classical umbral calculus one formally treats the indices j in a sequence B_j as if they were exponents, so that, in this case we can apply the binomial theorem and say

${\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}k^{p}={1 \over p+1}\sum _{j=0}^{p}{p+1 \choose j}B_{j}n^{p+1-j}={1 \over p+1}\sum _{j=0}^{p}{p+1 \choose j}B^{j}n^{p+1-j}}$

${\displaystyle ={(B+n)^{p+1}-B^{p+1} \over p+1}.}$

In the modern umbral calculus, one considers the linear functional T on the vector space of polynomials in a variable b given by

${\displaystyle T(b^{j})=B_{j}.\,}$

Then one can say

${\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}k^{p}={1 \over p+1}\sum _{j=0}^{p}{p+1 \choose j}B_{j}n^{p+1-j}={1 \over p+1}\sum _{j=0}^{p}{p+1 \choose j}T(b^{j})n^{p+1-j}}$

${\displaystyle ={1 \over p+1}T\left(\sum _{j=0}^{p}{p+1 \choose j}b^{j}n^{p+1-j}\right)=T\left({(b+n)^{p+1}-b^{p+1} \over p+1}\right).}$

• Jacobi, Carl (1834). "De usu legitimo formulae summatoriae Maclaurinianae". Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik. 12. pp. 263–72.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Weisstein, Eric W. "Faulhaber's formula". MathWorld.
• Johann Faulhaber (1631). Academia Algebrae - Darinnen die miraculosische Inventiones zu den höchsten Cossen weiters continuirt und profitiert werden. A very rare book, but Knuth has placed a photocopy in the Stanford library, call number QA154.8 F3 1631a f MATH. (online copy at Google Books)
• Beardon, A. F. (1996). "Sums of Powers of Integers" (PDF). American Mathematical Monthly. 103 (3): 201–213. doi:10.1080/00029890.1996.12004725. Retrieved 2011-10-23. (Winner of a Lester R. Ford Award)
• Schumacher, Raphael (2016). "An Extended Version of Faulhaber's Formula" (PDF). Journal of Integer Sequences. 19.

• Orosi, Greg (2018). "A Simple Derivation Of Faulhaber's Formula" (PDF). Applied Mathematics E-Notes. 18. pp. 124–126.