Equal Citizens

Lessig is the founder and president of Equal Citizens.

The following individuals serve as the Board of Directors of Equal Citizens Foundation:

Charles Kolb (2018–present), President and CEO of DisruptDC Celinda Lake (2018–present), President of Lake Research Partners Lawrence Lessig (2018–present), Professor at Harvard Law School Richard Painter (2018–present), Law Professor at the University of Minnesota, US Senate Candidate Robert Reich (2018–present), Professor at UC Berkeley, former US Secretary of Labor

Funding for Equal Citizens comes from small-dollar online donations and grants from philanthropic foundations. Equal Citizens does not accept funds from governments, intergovernmental organizations, political parties, or corporations.

In September 2017, Equal Citizens launched a 30-day crowdfunding campaign to fund their litigation to challenge winner-take-all in the Electoral College. In those 30 days, over 35,000 people signed up, over 5,000 people donated, and the crowdfunding goal of $250,000 was met several days before the deadline.[3]

Equal Votes is a legal challenge to the constitutionality of a state's ability to allocate their electoral votes in a winner-take-all basis.[5] Lessig argues that based on the "one person, one vote" principle already articulated by the Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore, the winner-take-all system is unconstitutional—it is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause that ensures all votes must be treated equally under the law.[6] By allocating their Electoral College votes according to winner-take-all, Equal Citizens believes states effectively discard the votes of United States citizens in the vote for president.

The Equal Votes litigation team is led by Bush v Gore lawyer David Boies and includes attorneys from distinguished law firms across the country such as Alston & Bird and Steptoe & Johnson. The litigation strategy advisory team includes former White House chief ethics lawyer Richard Painter, NYU Professor of Constitutional Law Samuel Issacharoff, and Duke Law Professor Guy-Uriel Charles.

In September 2017, Equal Citizens launched a 30-day crowdfunding campaign to raise $250,000 to fund the beginning stages of the Equal Votes project, and succeeded in meeting the funding goal before the deadline.[7] During the campaign, the law firm of Boies, Schiller & Flexner volunteered to lead the litigation pro bono.[8]

On February 21, 2018, under the leadership of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, the litigation team filed four lawsuits in four states — California, Texas, Massachusetts, and South Carolina — on behalf of a diverse group of Democrats and Republicans whose votes for president do not matter in the general election under the winner-take-all system. All four cases raise constitutional claims grounded in the 14th and 1st Amendments. In addition, the suits in Texas and South Carolina claim the present system violates the Voting Rights Act by disenfranchising minority voters.[9] Lessig said that he hopes one of the four cases will get to the Supreme Court "before too far into the 2020 presidential cycle".[10]

In 2016, seven electors voted contrary to their stated pledge in the Electoral College. In Washington state, three electors were each fined $1,000 for their vote, and in Colorado, one elector was removed and two others were threatened for breaking their pledge. In 2017, Equal Citizens filed the case Baca v. Colorado Department of State[11] on behalf of three electors in Colorado and Guerra v. Washington State Office of Administrative Hearings[12] on behalf of the three electors who were fined by Washington State.

In explaining the litigation, Equal Citizens' chief counsel Jason Harrow argued that "the framers of the Constitution intended presidential electors to be able to exercise independent judgment in casting their votes for president of the United States".[13] In March 2017, an administrative law judge rejected the arguments of the Washington plaintiffs. Thurston County Superior Court Judge Carol Murphy later denied their claim in December 2017.[14] After the ruling, Harrow said that Murphy's decision did not affect Equal Citizens' goal of eventually taking the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.[15] The Washington Supreme Court later upheld the fines. In April 2018, U.S. District Court Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel rejected the Colorado plaintiffs' case, declaring that they lacked standing.[16][17] Equal Citizens appealed the judge's decision,[18] and a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled 2–1 in favor of the electors, finding that the Colorado's faithless elector law is unconstitutional.[19] The Washington electors further appealed their case to the U.S. Supreme Court, while Colorado also appealed the decision of the Tenth Circuit. On January 17, 2020, the Supreme Court agreed to hear both cases in a consolidated fashion during the 2019–2020 term.[20]

Alaskan law limits contributions to independent political groups.[21] But these limits are no longer enforced because of a federal court decision, SpeechNOW.org v FEC. Alaska, however, permits residents to file a lawsuit if the state election management body, the Alaska Public Offices Commission, is not enforcing its election law. Under these rules, on January 31, 2018, Equal Citizens brought a complaint on behalf of three Alaska citizens, including James Barnett, a former Anchorage municipal politician, claiming the Alaska Public Offices Commission did not enforce the law by letting two Alaskan super PACs accept contributions greater than the amount stipulated by Alaska law.[22] The two super PACs involved are Interior Voters for John Coghill, an outside group that supported the election of Republican state Senate majority leader John Coghill, and Working Families of Alaska.[23] The goal is to relitigate the federal court decision SpeechNOW.org v. FEC that created the legal entity of super PACs.[24]

In December 2016 Lawrence Lessig, Mark Lemley, and Michael Hawley established The Electors Trust with the backing of Equal Citizens, to provide pro bono legal counsel and a secure, anonymous communications platform for the 538 members of the United States Electoral College who could potentially become faithless electors to prevent the election of Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.[25][26] The goal of the organization was also to help electors determine whether there was sufficient support to prevent Donald Trump's election.[27] In December 2016, Lessig claimed that there were between 20 and 30 Republican electors considering voting against Trump.[28]

The Electors Trust offered counsel through California law firm Durie Tangri.[29] On December 15, 2016, Lessig told reporters that The Electors Trust had spent $20,000 for security for its lawyers due to threats from Trump supporters.[30]

Lessig and The Electors Trust represented Christopher Suprun, an elector from Texas, who announced he would vote against Donald Trump regardless of how his state voted.[31]

Working together with several other groups such as the Hamilton Electors as well as celebrities, the campaign resulted in the most number of "faithless" electoral votes ever cast in a single presidential election.[2]

In June 2018, Equal Citizens launched an advocacy campaign partnered with Demand Progress, the EFF, Public Knowledge, and the Internet Archive to pressure Congress to change provisions in the Compensating Legacy Artists for their Songs, Service, and Important Contributions to Society Act (The CLASSICS Act).[32] Their main demand, articulated in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee, was to add a registration requirement to any copyright extension, so as to allow unregistered works to pass into the public domain.[33]

In May 2018, Equal Citizens, in partnership with musician Bassnectar and the electronic music festival Electric Forest, launched the Creative Democracy Contest, in which online users could enter art depicting facts about American democracy for prizes.[34] Judges for the contest included Lawrence Lessig, actress Bridgit Mendler, and artist Sebastian Wahl.[35]