Coefficient of restitution

e is usually a positive, real number between 0 and 1:

e = 0: This is a perfectly inelastic collision. This means kinetic energy along the common normal is 0. Kinetic energy is converted to heat or work done in deforming the objects.

0 < e < 1: This is a real-world inelastic collision, in which some kinetic energy is dissipated.

e = 1: This is a perfectly elastic collision, in which no kinetic energy is dissipated, and the objects rebound from one another with the same relative speed with which they approached.

e < 0: A COR less than zero would represent a collision in which the separation velocity of the objects has the same direction (sign) as the closing velocity, implying the objects passed through one another without fully engaging. This may also be thought of as an incomplete transfer of momentum. An example of this might be a small, dense object passing through a large, less dense one – e.g., a bullet passing through a target, or a motorcycle passing through a motor home or a wave tearing through a dam.

e > 1: This would represent a collision in which energy is released, for example, nitrocellulose billiard balls can literally explode at the point of impact. Also, some recent articles have described superelastic collisions in which it is argued that the COR can take a value greater than one in a special case of oblique collisions.[2][3][4] These phenomena are due to the change of rebound trajectory caused by friction. In such collision kinetic energy is increased in a manner energy is released in some sort of explosion. It is possible that ${\displaystyle e=\infty }$ for a perfect explosion of a rigid system.

Maximum deformation phase – In any collision for 0 < e ≤ 1, there is a condition when for short moment along line of impact colliding bodies have same velocity when its condition of kinetic energy is lost in maximum fraction as heat, sound and light with deformation potential energy. For this short duration this collision e=0 and may be referred as inelastic phase.

The COR is a property of a pair of objects in a collision, not a single object. If a given object collides with two different objects, each collision would have its own COR. When an object is described as having a coefficient of restitution, as if it were an intrinsic property without reference to a second object, it is assumed to be between identical spheres or against a perfectly rigid wall.

A perfectly rigid wall is not possible but can be approximated by a steel block if investigating the COR of spheres with a much smaller modulus of elasticity. Otherwise, the COR will rise and then fall based on collision velocity in a more complicated manner.[5]

In a one-dimensional collision, the two key principles are: conservation of energy (conservation of kinetic energy if the collision is perfectly elastic) and conservation of (linear) momentum. A third equation can be derived[6] from these two, which is the restitution equation as stated above. When solving problems, any two of the three equations can be used. The advantage of using the restitution equation is that it sometimes provides a more convenient way to approach the problem.

Let ${\displaystyle m_{1}}$, ${\displaystyle m_{2}}$ be the mass of object 1 and object 2 respectively. Let ${\displaystyle u_{1}}$, ${\displaystyle u_{2}}$ be the initial velocity of object 1 and object 2 respectively. Let ${\displaystyle v_{1}}$, ${\displaystyle v_{2}}$ be the final velocity of object 1 and object 2 respectively.

${\displaystyle {\begin{cases}{\frac {1}{2}}m_{1}u_{1}^{2}+{\frac {1}{2}}m_{2}u_{2}^{2}={\frac {1}{2}}m_{1}v_{1}^{2}+{\frac {1}{2}}m_{2}v_{2}^{2}\\m_{1}u_{1}+m_{2}u_{2}=m_{1}v_{1}+m_{2}v_{2}\end{cases}}}$

From the first equation,

${\displaystyle m_{1}(u_{1}^{2}-v_{1}^{2})=m_{2}(v_{2}^{2}-u_{2}^{2})}$

${\displaystyle m_{1}(u_{1}+v_{1})(u_{1}-v_{1})=m_{2}(v_{2}+u_{2})(v_{2}-u_{2})}$

From the second equation,

${\displaystyle m_{1}(u_{1}-v_{1})=m_{2}(v_{2}-u_{2})}$

After division,

${\displaystyle u_{1}+v_{1}=v_{2}+u_{2}}$

${\displaystyle u_{1}-u_{2}=-(v_{1}-v_{2})}$

${\displaystyle -{\frac {v_{1}-v_{2}}{u_{1}-u_{2}}}=1}$

The equation above is the restitution equation, and the coefficient of restitution is 1, which is a perfectly elastic collision.

The coefficient of restitution entered the common vocabulary, among golfers at least, when golf club manufacturers began making thin-faced drivers with a so-called "trampoline effect" that creates drives of a greater distance as a result of the flexing and subsequent release of stored energy, imparting greater impulse to the ball. The USGA (America's governing golfing body) has started testing drivers for COR and has placed the upper limit at 0.83.In April 2006 issued a more detailed report using five of the top golf balls used by professional golfers. In this report facts about golf balls beyond the subject of COR are highlighted. Due to the nature of polymers (man-made plastics) where rates of stress & strain are not Newtonian like fluids, metals etc. Because of this COR is a function of rates of clubhead speeds and diminish as clubhead speed increase. The USGA clearly states that nothing much can be gained beyond 90 mph clubhead speed. In the report COR ranges from 0.845 for 90 mph to as low as 0.797 at 130 mph. The above-mentioned "trampoline effect" clearly shows this since it reduces the rate of stress of the collision, or in another word "increases" the time of the collision. The number of this report; RB/cor2006-01by Steven J.Quintavalla Ph.D. According to one article (addressing COR in tennis racquets), "[f]or the Benchmark Conditions, the coefficient of restitution used is 0.85 for all racquets, eliminating the variables of string tension and frame stiffness which could add or subtract from the coefficient of restitution."[7]

The International Table Tennis Federation specifies that the ball shall bounce up 24–26 cm when dropped from a height of 30.5 cm on to a standard steel block thereby having a COR of 0.89 to 0.92.[8] For a hard linoleum floor with concrete underneath, a leather basketball has a COR around 0.81–0.85.[9]

The above equations can be derived from the analytical solution to the system of equations formed by the definition of the COR and the law of the conservation of momentum (which holds for all collisions). Using the notation from above where ${\displaystyle u}$ represents the velocity before the collision and ${\displaystyle v}$ after, yields:

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&m_{\text{a}}u_{\text{a}}+m_{\text{b}}u_{\text{b}}=m_{\text{a}}v_{\text{a}}+m_{\text{b}}v_{\text{b}}\\&C_{R}={\frac {v_{\text{b}}-v_{\text{a}}}{u_{\text{a}}-u_{\text{b}}}}\\\end{aligned}}}$

Solving the momentum conservation equation for ${\displaystyle v_{\text{a}}}$ and the definition of the coefficient of restitution for ${\displaystyle v_{\text{b}}}$ yields:

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&{\frac {m_{\text{a}}u_{\text{a}}+m_{\text{b}}u_{\text{b}}-m_{\text{b}}v_{\text{b}}}{m_{\text{a}}}}=v_{\text{a}}\\&v_{\text{b}}=C_{R}(u_{\text{a}}-u_{\text{b}})+v_{\text{a}}\\\end{aligned}}}$

Next, substitution into the first equation for ${\displaystyle v_{\text{b}}}$ and then resolving for ${\displaystyle v_{\text{a}}}$ gives:

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&{\frac {m_{\text{a}}u_{\text{a}}+m_{\text{b}}u_{\text{b}}-m_{\text{b}}C_{R}(u_{\text{a}}-u_{\text{b}})-m_{\text{b}}v_{\text{a}}}{m_{\text{a}}}}=v_{\text{a}}\\&\\&{\frac {m_{\text{a}}u_{\text{a}}+m_{\text{b}}u_{\text{b}}+m_{\text{b}}C_{R}(u_{\text{b}}-u_{\text{a}})}{m_{\text{a}}}}=v_{\text{a}}\left[1+{\frac {m_{\text{b}}}{m_{\text{a}}}}\right]\\&\\&{\frac {m_{\text{a}}u_{\text{a}}+m_{\text{b}}u_{\text{b}}+m_{\text{b}}C_{R}(u_{\text{b}}-u_{\text{a}})}{m_{\text{a}}+m_{\text{b}}}}=v_{\text{a}}\\\end{aligned}}}$

A similar derivation yields the formula for ${\displaystyle v_{\text{b}}}$.

When colliding objects do not have a direction of motion that is in-line with their centers of gravity and point of impact, or if their contact surfaces at that point are not perpendicular to that line, some energy that would have been available for the post-collision velocity difference will be lost to rotation and friction. Energy losses to vibration and the resulting sound are usually negligible.

When a soft object strikes a harder object, most of the energy available for the post-collision velocity will be stored in the soft object. The COR will depend on how efficient the soft object is at storing the energy in compression without losing it to heat and plastic deformation. A rubber ball will bounce better off concrete than a glass ball, but the COR of glass-on-glass is a lot higher than rubber-on-rubber because some of the energy in rubber is lost to heat when it is compressed. When a rubber ball collides with a glass ball, the COR will depend entirely on the rubber. For this reason, determining the COR of a material when there is not identical material for collision is best done by using a much harder material.

Since there is no perfectly rigid material, hard materials such as metals and ceramics have their COR theoretically determined by considering the collision between identical spheres. In practice, a 2-ball Newton's cradle may be employed but such a set up is not conducive to quickly testing samples.

The Leeb rebound hardness test is the only commonly-available test related to determining the COR. It uses a tip of tungsten carbide, one of the hardest substances available, dropped onto test samples from a specific height. But the shape of the tip, the velocity of impact, and the tungsten carbide are all variables that affect the result that is expressed in terms of 1000*COR. It does not give an objective COR for the material that is independent from the test.

A comprehensive study of coefficients of restitution in dependence on material properties (elastic moduli, rheology), direction of impact, coefficient of friction and adhesive properties of impacting bodies can be found in[11].

The COR is not a material property because it changes with the shape of the material and the specifics of the collision, but it can be predicted from material properties and the velocity of impact when the specifics of the collision are simplified. To avoid the complications of rotational and frictional losses, we can consider the ideal case of an identical pair of spherical objects, colliding so that their centers of mass and relative velocity are all in-line.

Many materials like metals and ceramics (but not rubbers and plastics) are assumed to be perfectly elastic when their yield strength is not approached during impact. The impact energy is theoretically stored only in the spring-effect of elastic compression and results in e = 1. But this applies only at velocities less than about 0.1 m/s to 1 m/s. The elastic range can be exceeded at higher velocities because all the kinetic energy is concentrated at the point of impact. Specifically, the yield strength is usually exceeded in part of the contact area, losing energy to plastic deformation by not remaining in the elastic region. To account for this, the following estimates the COR by estimating the percent of the initial impact energy that did not get lost to plastic deformation. Approximately, it divides how easy a volume of the material can store energy in compression (${\displaystyle 1/{\text{elastic modulus}}}$) by how well it can stay in the elastic range (${\displaystyle 1/{\text{yield strength}}}$):

${\displaystyle \%{\text{impact energy available for restitution}}\propto {\frac {\text{yield strength}}{\text{elastic modulus}}}}$

For a given material density and velocity this results in:

${\displaystyle {\text{coefficient of restitution}}\propto {\sqrt {\frac {\text{yield strength}}{\text{elastic modulus}}}}}$

A high yield strength allows more of the "contact volume" of the material to stay in the elastic region at higher energies. A lower elastic modulus allows a larger contact area to develop during impact so the energy is distributed to a larger volume beneath the surface at the contact point. This helps prevent the yield strength from being exceeded.

A more precise theoretical development[12] shows the velocity and density of the material to also be important when predicting the COR at moderate velocities faster than elastic collision (greater than 0.1 m/s for metals) and slower than large permanent plastic deformation (less than 100 m/s). A lower velocity increases the coefficient by needing less energy to be absorbed. A lower density also means less initial energy needs to be absorbed. The density instead of mass is used because the volume of the sphere cancels out with the volume of the affected volume at the contact area. In this way, the radius of the sphere does not affect the coefficient. A pair of colliding spheres of different sizes but of the same material have the same coefficient as below, but multiplied by ${\displaystyle \left({\frac {R_{1}}{R_{2}}}\right)^{\frac {3}{8}}}$

Combining these four variables, a theoretical estimation of the coefficient of restitution can be made when a ball is dropped onto a surface of the same material.[13]

• e = coefficient of restitution
• S_y = dynamic yield strength (dynamic "elastic limit")
• E′ = effective elastic modulus
• ρ = density
• v = velocity at impact
• μ = Poisson's ratio

${\displaystyle e=3.1\left({\frac {S_{\text{y}}}{1}}\right)^{\frac {5}{8}}\left({\frac {1}{E'}}\right)^{\frac {1}{2}}\left({\frac {1}{v}}\right)^{\frac {1}{4}}\left({\frac {1}{\rho }}\right)^{\frac {1}{8}}}$

${\displaystyle E'={\frac {E}{1-\mu ^{2}}}}$

This equation overestimates the actual COR. For metals, it applies when v is approximately between 0.1 m/s and 100 m/s and in general when:

${\displaystyle 0.001<{\frac {\rho v^{2}}{S_{\text{y}}}}<0.1}$

At slower velocities the COR is higher than the above equation predicts, theoretically reaching e=1 when the above fraction is less than ${\displaystyle 10^{-6}}$ m/s. It gives the following theoretical coefficient of restitution for solid spheres dropped 1 meter (v = 4.5 m/s). Values greater than 1 indicate that the equation has errors. Yield strength instead of dynamic yield strength was used.

The COR for plastics and rubbers are greater than their actual values because they do not behave as ideally elastic as metals, glasses, and ceramics due to heating during compression. So the following is only a guide to ranking of polymers.

Polymers (overestimated compared to metals and ceramics):

• polybutadiene (golf balls shell) 11.8
• butyl rubber 6.24
• EVA 4.85
• silicone elastomers 2.80
• polycarbonate 1.46
• nylon 1.28
• polyethylene 1.24
• Teflon 1.21
• polypropylene 1.14
• ABS 1.12
• acrylic 1.06
• PET 0.95
• polystyrene 0.87
• PVC 0.86

For metals the range of speeds to which this theory can apply is about 0.1 to 5 m/s which is a drop of 0.5 mm to 1.25 meters (page 366[14]).