Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout

Sioux City & Pacific R.R. Co. v. Stout
Decided January 26, 1874
Full case name Sioux City & Pacific R.R. Co. v. Stout
Citations 84 U.S. 657 (more)
17 Wall. 657; 21 L. Ed. 745
Court membership
Chief Justice
vacant
Associate Justices
Nathan Clifford · Noah H. Swayne
Samuel F. Miller · David Davis
Stephen J. Field · William Strong
Joseph P. Bradley · Ward Hunt
Case opinions
Majority Hunt, joined by unanimous
A railroad turntable similar to this one was thought to breach the duty to children trespassers because it induced them to trespass. The original turntable was torn down in the late 1890s.

Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout, 84 U.S. (17 Wall.) 657 (1873), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that first enunciated the idea that a landowner could be liable for the injuries of a child trespasser.

Events

On March 29th, 1869, a small child was injured by a railroad turntable owned by Sioux City and Pacific Railroad, which was being operated in Blair, Nebraska. The child was playing on the turntable, which injured his/her foot. The father took the company to court in Nebraska, but it was removed to the Supreme Court.

Decision

A child was injured by a railroad turntable owned by Sioux City and Pacific Railroad, which was being operated in Blair, Nebraska. Sioux City & Pacific Railroad company was held liable, despite the prevailing idea that a landowner was not held liable for injuries to trespassers. Trespassing children were thought to be a special case that required a higher duty of care. This theory of liability came to be known as the "turntable doctrine" and later the attractive nuisance doctrine by the case Keffe v. Milwaukee & St. Paul R.R. Co.

See also

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.