Maxwell's equations

Maxwell's equations (mid-left) as featured on a monument in front of Warsaw University's Center of New Technologies

Maxwell's equations are a set of partial differential equations that, together with the Lorentz force law, form the foundation of classical electromagnetism, classical optics, and electric circuits. The equations provide a mathematical model for electric, optical and radio technologies, such as power generation, electric motors, wireless communication, lenses, radar etc. Maxwell's equations describe how electric and magnetic fields are generated by charges, currents, and changes of the fields. One important consequence of the equations is that they demonstrate how fluctuating electric and magnetic fields propagate at the speed of light. Known as electromagnetic radiation, these waves may occur at various wavelengths to produce a spectrum from radio waves to γ-rays. The equations are named after the physicist and mathematician James Clerk Maxwell, who between 1861 and 1862 published an early form of the equations that included the Lorentz force law. He also first used the equations to propose that light is an electromagnetic phenomenon.

The equations have two major variants. The microscopic Maxwell equations have universal applicability, but are unwieldy for common calculations. They relate the electric and magnetic fields to total charge and total current, including the complicated charges and currents in materials at the atomic scale. The "macroscopic" Maxwell equations define two new auxiliary fields that describe the large-scale behaviour of matter without having to consider atomic scale charges and quantum phenomena like spins. However, their use requires experimentally determining parameters for a phenomenological description of the electromagnetic response of materials.

The term "Maxwell's equations" is often also used for equivalent alternative formulations. Versions of Maxwell's equations based on the electric and magnetic potentials are preferred for explicitly solving the equations as a boundary value problem, analytical mechanics, or for use in quantum mechanics. The spacetime formulations (i.e., on spacetime rather than space and time separately), are commonly used in high energy and gravitational physics because they make the compatibility of the equations with special and general relativity manifest.^{[note 1]} In fact, Einstein developed special and general relativity to accommodate the invariant speed of light that drops out of the Maxwell equations with the principle that only relative movement has physical consequences.

Since the mid-20th century, it has been understood that Maxwell's equations are not exact, but a classical limit of the fundamental theory of quantum electrodynamics.

Conceptual descriptions

Gauss's law

Gauss's law describes the relationship between a static electric field and the electric charges that cause it: The static electric field points away from positive charges and towards negative charges, and the net outflow of the electric field through any closed surface is proportional to the charge enclosed by the surface. Picturing the electric field by its field lines, this means the field lines begin at positive electric charges and end at negative electric charges. 'Counting' the number of field lines passing through a closed surface yields the total charge (including bound charge due to polarization of material) enclosed by that surface, divided by dielectricity of free space (the vacuum permittivity).

Gauss's law for magnetism: magnetic field lines never begin nor end but form loops or extend to infinity as shown here with the magnetic field due to a ring of current.

Gauss's law for magnetism

Gauss's law for magnetism states that there are no "magnetic charges" (also called magnetic monopoles), analogous to electric charges.^[1] Instead, the magnetic field due to materials is generated by a configuration called a dipole, and the net outflow of the magnetic field through any closed surface is zero. Magnetic dipoles are best represented as loops of current but resemble positive and negative 'magnetic charges', inseparably bound together, having no net 'magnetic charge'. In terms of field lines, this equation states that magnetic field lines neither begin nor end but make loops or extend to infinity and back. In other words, any magnetic field line that enters a given volume must somewhere exit that volume. Equivalent technical statements are that the sum total magnetic flux through any Gaussian surface is zero, or that the magnetic field is a solenoidal vector field.

Faraday's law

In a geomagnetic storm, a surge in the flux of charged particles temporarily alters Earth's magnetic field, which induces electric fields in Earth's atmosphere, thus causing surges in electrical power grids. (Not to scale.)

The Maxwell–Faraday version of Faraday's law of induction describes how a time varying magnetic field creates ("induces") an electric field.^[1] In integral form, it states that the work per unit charge required to move a charge around a closed loop equals the rate of decrease of the magnetic flux through the enclosed surface.

The dynamically induced electric field has closed field lines similar to a magnetic field, unless superposed by a static (charge induced) electric field. This aspect of electromagnetic induction is the operating principle behind many electric generators: for example, a rotating bar magnet creates a changing magnetic field, which in turn generates an electric field in a nearby wire.

Ampère's law with Maxwell's addition

Magnetic core memory (1954) is an application of Ampère's law. Each core stores one bit of data.

Ampère's law with Maxwell's addition states that magnetic fields can be generated in two ways: by electric current (this was the original "Ampère's law") and by changing electric fields (this was "Maxwell's addition", which he called displacement current). In integral form, the magnetic field induced around any closed loop is proportional to the electric current plus displacement current (proportional to the rate of change of electric flux) through the enclosed surface.

Maxwell's addition to Ampère's law is particularly important: it makes the set of equations mathematically consistent for non static fields, without changing the laws of Ampere and Gauss for static fields.^[2] However, as a consequence, it predicts that a changing magnetic field induces an electric field and vice versa.^[1]^[3] Therefore, these equations allow self-sustaining "electromagnetic waves" to travel through empty space (see electromagnetic wave equation).

The speed calculated for electromagnetic waves, which could be predicted from experiments on charges and currents,^{[note 2]} exactly matches the speed of light; indeed, light is one form of electromagnetic radiation (as are X-rays, radio waves, and others). Maxwell understood the connection between electromagnetic waves and light in 1861, thereby unifying the theories of electromagnetism and optics.

Formulation in terms of electric and magnetic fields (microscopic or in vacuum version)

In the electric and magnetic field formulation there are four equations that determine the fields for given charge and current distribution. A separate law of nature, the Lorentz force law, describes how, conversely, the electric and magnetic field act on charged particles and currents. A version of this law was included in the original equations by Maxwell but, by convention, is included no longer. The vector calculus formalism below, due to Oliver Heaviside,^[4]^[5] has become standard. It is manifestly rotation invariant, and therefore mathematically much more transparent than Maxwell's original 20 equations in x,y,z components. The relativistic formulations are even more symmetric and manifestly Lorentz invariant. For the same equations expressed using tensor calculus or differential forms, see alternative formulations.

The differential and integral equations formulations are mathematically equivalent and are both useful. The integral formulation relates fields within a region of space to fields on the boundary and can often be used to simplify and directly calculate fields from symmetric distributions of charges and currents. On the other hand, the differential equations are purely local and are a more natural starting point for calculating the fields in more complicated (less symmetric) situations, for example using finite element analysis.^[6]

Formulation in SI units convention

Name	Integral equations	Differential equations
Gauss's law	$\oiint$ ${\scriptstyle \partial \Omega }$ $\mathbf {E} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} ={\frac {1}{\varepsilon _{0}}}\iiint _{\Omega }\rho \,\mathrm {d} V$	$\nabla \cdot \mathbf {E} ={\frac {\rho }{\varepsilon _{0}}}$
Gauss's law for magnetism	$\oiint$ ${\scriptstyle \partial \Omega }$ $\mathbf {B} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} =0$	$\nabla \cdot \mathbf {B} =0$
Maxwell–Faraday equation (Faraday's law of induction)	$\oint _{\partial \Sigma }\mathbf {E} \cdot \mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {l}}=-{\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} t}}\iint _{\Sigma }\mathbf {B} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S}$	$\nabla \times \mathbf {E} =-{\frac {\partial \mathbf {B} }{\partial t}}$
Ampère's circuital law (with Maxwell's addition)	${\begin{aligned}\oint _{\partial \Sigma }&\mathbf {B} \cdot \mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {l}}=\\&\mu _{0}\left(\iint _{\Sigma }\mathbf {J} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} +\varepsilon _{0}{\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} t}}\iint _{\Sigma }\mathbf {E} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} \right)\\\end{aligned}}$	$\nabla \times \mathbf {B} =\mu _{0}\left(\mathbf {J} +\varepsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {E} }{\partial t}}\right)$

Formulation in Gaussian units convention

The definitions of charge, electric field, and magnetic field can be altered to simplify theoretical calculation, by absorbing dimensioned factors of $ε 0$ and $c$ into the units of calculation, by convention. With a corresponding change in convention for the Lorentz force law this yields the same physics, i.e. trajectories of charged particles, or work done by an electric motor. These definitions are often preferred in theoretical and high energy physics where it is natural to take the electric and magnetic field with the same units, to simplify the appearance of the electromagnetic tensor: the Lorentz covariant object unifying electric and magnetic field would then contain components with uniform unit and dimension.^[7]^:vii Such modified definitions are conventionally used with the Gaussian (CGS) units. Using these definitions and conventions, colloquially "in Gaussian units",^[8] the Maxwell equations become:^[9]

Name	Integral equations	Differential equations
Gauss's law	$\oiint$ ${\scriptstyle \partial \Omega }$ $\mathbf {E} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} =4\pi \iiint _{\Omega }\rho \,\mathrm {d} V$	$\nabla \cdot \mathbf {E} =4\pi \rho$
Gauss's law for magnetism	$\oiint$ ${\scriptstyle \partial \Omega }$ $\mathbf {B} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} =0$	$\nabla \cdot \mathbf {B} =0$
Maxwell–Faraday equation (Faraday's law of induction)	$\oint _{\partial \Sigma }\mathbf {E} \cdot \mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}=-{\frac {1}{c}}{\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} t}}\iint _{\Sigma }\mathbf {B} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S}$	$\nabla \times \mathbf {E} =-{\frac {1}{c}}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {B} }{\partial t}}$
Ampère's circuital law (with Maxwell's addition)	${\begin{aligned}\oint _{\partial \Sigma }&\mathbf {B} \cdot \mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}=\\&{\frac {1}{c}}\left(4\pi \iint _{\Sigma }\mathbf {J} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} +{\frac {\mathrel {\mathrm {d} }}{\mathrm {d} t}}\iint _{\Sigma }\mathbf {E} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} \right)\end{aligned}}$	$\nabla \times \mathbf {B} ={\frac {1}{c}}\left(4\pi \mathbf {J} +{\frac {\partial \mathbf {E} }{\partial t}}\right)$

Note that the equations are particularly readable when length and time are measured in compatible units like seconds and lightseconds i.e. in units such that c = 1 unit of length/unit of time. Ever since 1983, metres and seconds are compatible except for historical legacy since by definition c = 299 792 458 m/s (≈ 1.0 feet/nanosecond).

Further cosmetic changes, called rationalisations, are possible by absorbing factors of $4 π$ depending on whether we want Coulomb's law or Gauss law to come out nicely, see Lorentz-Heaviside units (used mainly in particle physics). In theoretical physics it is often useful to choose units such that Plancks constant, the elementary charge, and even Newton's constant are 1. See Planck units.

Key to the notation

Symbols in bold represent vector quantities, and symbols in italics represent scalar quantities, unless otherwise indicated.

The equations introduce the electric field, $E$ , a vector field, and the magnetic field, $B$ , a pseudovector field, each generally having a time and location dependence. The sources are

the total electric charge density (total charge per unit volume), $ρ$ , and
the total electric current density (total current per unit area), $J$ .

The universal constants appearing in the equations are

the permittivity of free space, $ε 0$ , and
the permeability of free space, $μ 0$ , and
the speed of light, $c={\frac {1}{\sqrt {\varepsilon _{0}\mu _{0}}}}$

Differential equations

In the differential equations,

the nabla symbol, $\nabla$ , denotes the three-dimensional gradient operator, del,
the $\nabla\cdot$ symbol (pronounced "del dot") denotes the divergence operator,
the $\nabla\times$ symbol (pronounced "del cross") denotes the curl operator.

Integral equations

In the integral equations,

$Ω$ is any fixed volume with closed boundary surface $\partialΩ$ , and
$Σ$ is any fixed surface with closed boundary curve $\partialΣ$ ,

Here a fixed volume or surface means that it does not change over time. The equations are correct, complete and a little easier to interpret with time-independent surfaces. For example, since the surface is time-independent, we can bring the differentiation under the integral sign in Faraday's law:

{\frac {d}{dt}}\iint _{\Sigma }\mathbf {B} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} =\iint _{\Sigma }{\frac {\partial \mathbf {B} }{\partial t}}\cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} \,,

Maxwell's equations can be formulated with possibly time-dependent surfaces and volumes by using the differential version and using Gauss and Stokes formula appropriately.

$\oiint$ ${\scriptstyle \partial \Omega }$ is a surface integral over the boundary surface $\partialΩ$ , with the loop indicating the surface is closed
$\iiint _{\Omega }$ is a volume integral over the volume $Ω$ ,
$\oint _{\partial \Sigma }$ is a line integral around the boundary curve $\partialΣ$ , with the loop indicating the curve is closed.
$\iint _{\Sigma }$ is a surface integral over the surface $Σ$ ,
The total electric charge $Q$ enclosed in $Ω$ is the volume integral over $Ω$ of the charge density $ρ$ (see the "macroscopic formulation" section below):

Q=\iiint _{\Omega }\rho \ \mathrm {d} V,

where

dV

is the volume element.

The net electric current $I$ is the surface integral of the electric current density $J$ passing through a fixed surface, $Σ$ :

I=\iint _{\Sigma }\mathbf {J} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} ,

where

d S

denotes the vector element of surface area

S

, normal to surface

Σ

. (Vector area is sometimes denoted by

A

rather than

S

, but this conflicts with the notation for magnetic potential).

Relationship between differential and integral formulations

The equivalence of the differential and integral formulations are a consequence of the Gauss divergence theorem and the Kelvin–Stokes theorem.

Flux and divergence

Volume

Ω

and its closed boundary

\partialΩ

, containing (respectively enclosing) a source

(+)

and sink

(-)

of a vector field

F

. Here,

F

could be the

E

field with source electric charges, but not the

B

field, which has no magnetic charges as shown. The outward unit normal is n.

According to the (purely mathematical) Gauss divergence theorem the electric flux through the boundary surface $\partialΩ$ can be rewritten as

$\oiint$

{\scriptstyle \partial \Omega }

\mathbf {E} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} =\iiint _{\Omega }\nabla \cdot \mathbf {E} \,\mathrm {d} V

The integral version of Gauss's equation can thus be rewritten as

\iiint _{\Omega }\left(\nabla \cdot \mathbf {E} -{\frac {\rho }{\epsilon _{0}}}\right)\,\mathrm {d} V=0

Since $Ω$ is arbitrary (e.g. an arbitrary small ball with arbitrary center), this is satisfied iff the integrand is zero. This is the differential equations formulation of Gauss equation up to a trivial rearrangement.

Similarly rewriting the magnetic flux in Gauss's law for magnetism in integral form gives

$\oiint$

{\scriptstyle \partial \Omega }

\mathbf {B} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} =\iiint _{\Omega }\nabla \cdot \mathbf {B} \,\mathrm {d} V=0

.

which is satisfied for all $Ω$ iff $\nabla \cdot {\mathbf {B}}=0$ .

Circulation and curl

Surface

Σ

with closed boundary

\partialΣ

.

F

could be the

E

or

B

fields. Again,

n

is the unit normal. (The curl of a vector field doesn't literally look like the "circulations", this is a heuristic depiction.)

By the Kelvin–Stokes theorem we can rewrite the line integrals of the fields around the closed boundary curve $\partialΣ$ to an integral of the "circulation of the fields" (i.e. their curls) over a surface it bounds, i.e.

\oint _{\partial \Sigma }\mathbf {B} \cdot \mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}=\iint _{\Sigma }(\nabla \times \mathbf {B} )\cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S}

,

Hence the modified Ampere law in integral form can be rewritten as

\iint _{\Sigma }\left(\nabla \times \mathbf {B} -\mu _{0}\left(\mathbf {J} +\epsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {E} }{\partial t}}\right)\right)\cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} =0

.

Since $Σ$ can be chosen arbitrarily, e.g. as an arbitrary small, arbitrary oriented, and arbitrary centered disk, we conclude that the integrand is zero iff Ampere's modified law in differential equations form is satisfied. The equivalence of Faraday's law in differential and integral form follows likewise.

The line integrals and curls are analogous to quantities in classical fluid dynamics: the circulation of a fluid is the line integral of the fluid's flow velocity field around a closed loop, and the vorticity of the fluid is the curl of the velocity field.

Charge conservation

The invariance of charge can be derived as a corollary of Maxwell's equations. The left hand side of the modified Ampere's Law has zero divergence by the div–curl identity. Combining the right hand side, Gauss's law, and interchange of derivatives gives:

0=\nabla \cdot \nabla \times \mathbf {B} =\mu _{0}\left(\nabla \cdot \mathbf {J} +\varepsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\nabla \cdot \mathbf {E} \right)=\mu _{0}\left(\nabla \cdot \mathbf {J} +{\frac {\partial \rho }{\partial t}}\right)

i.e.

{\frac {\partial \rho }{\partial t}}+\nabla \cdot \mathbf {J} =0

.

By the Gauss Divergence Theorem, this means the rate of change of charge in a fixed volume equals the net current flowing through the boundary:

{\frac {d}{dt}}Q_{\Omega }={\frac {d}{dt}}\iiint _{\Omega }\rho \mathrm {d} V=-

$\oiint$

{\scriptstyle \partial \Omega }

\mathbf {J} \cdot {\rm {d}}\mathbf {S} =-I_{\partial \Omega }.

In particular, in an isolated system the total charge is conserved.

Vacuum equations, electromagnetic waves and speed of light

This 3D diagram shows a plane linearly polarized wave propagating from left to right, defined by

E = E 0 sin(-ω t + k \cdot r)

and

B = B 0 sin(-ω t + k \cdot r)

The oscillating fields are detected at the flashing point. The horizontal wavelength is λ.

E 0 \cdot B 0 = 0 = E 0 \cdot k = B 0 \cdot k

In a region with no charges ( $ρ = 0$ ) and no currents ( $J = 0$ ), such as in a vacuum, Maxwell's equations reduce to:

{\begin{aligned}\nabla \cdot \mathbf {E} &=0\quad &\nabla \times \mathbf {E} &=-{\frac {\partial \mathbf {B} }{\partial t}},\\\nabla \cdot \mathbf {B} &=0\quad &\nabla \times \mathbf {B} &=\mu _{0}\varepsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {E} }{\partial t}}.\end{aligned}}

Taking the curl $(\nabla\times)$ of the curl equations, and using the curl of the curl identity we obtain

{\begin{aligned}\mu _{0}\varepsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial ^{2}\mathbf {E} }{\partial t^{2}}}-\nabla ^{2}\mathbf {E} =0\\\mu _{0}\varepsilon _{0}{\frac {\partial ^{2}\mathbf {B} }{\partial t^{2}}}-\nabla ^{2}\mathbf {B} =0\end{aligned}}

The quantity $\mu _{0}\varepsilon _{0}$ has the dimension of (time/length)². Defining $c=(\mu _{0}\varepsilon _{0})^{-1/2}$ , the equations above have the form of the standard wave equations

{\begin{aligned}{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}\mathbf {E} }{\partial t^{2}}}-\nabla ^{2}\mathbf {E} =0\\{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}\mathbf {B} }{\partial t^{2}}}-\nabla ^{2}\mathbf {B} =0\end{aligned}}

Already during Maxwell's lifetime, it was found that the known values for $\varepsilon _{0}$ and $\mu _{0}$ give $c\approx 2.998\times 10^{8}\,{\text{m/s}}$ , then already known to be the speed of light in free space. This let him to propose that light and radio waves were propagating electromagnetic waves, since amply confirmed. In the old SI system of units, the values of $\mu _{0}=4\pi \cdot 10^{-7}$ and $c=299792458\,{\text{m/s}}$ are defined constants, (which means that by definition $\varepsilon _{0}=8.854...10^{-12}{\text{F/m}}$ ) that define the ampere and the metre. In the new SI system, only c keeps its defined value, and the electron charge gets a defined value.

In materials with relative permittivity, $ε r$ , and relative permeability, $μ r$ , the phase velocity of light becomes

v_{\text{p}}={\frac {1}{\sqrt {\mu _{0}\mu _{\text{r}}\varepsilon _{0}\varepsilon _{\text{r}}}}}

which is usually^{[note 3]} less than $c$ .

In addition, $E$ and $B$ are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of wave propagation, and are in phase with each other. A sinusoidal plane wave is one special solution of these equations. Maxwell's equations explain how these waves can physically propagate through space. The changing magnetic field creates a changing electric field through Faraday's law. In turn, that electric field creates a changing magnetic field through Maxwell's addition to Ampère's law. This perpetual cycle allows these waves, now known as electromagnetic radiation, to move through space at velocity $c$ .

Macroscopic formulation

The above equations are the "microscopic" version of Maxwell's equations, expressing the electric and the magnetic fields in terms of the (possibly atomic-level) charges and currents present. This is sometimes called the "general" form, but the macroscopic version below is equally general, the difference being one of bookkeeping.

The microscopic version is sometimes called "Maxwell's equations in a vacuum": this refers to the fact that the material medium is not built into the structure of the equations, but appears only in the charge and current terms. The microscopic version was introduced by Lorentz, who tried to use it to derive the macroscopic properties of bulk matter from its microscopic constituents.^[10]^:5

"Maxwell's macroscopic equations", also known as Maxwell's equations in matter, are more similar to those that Maxwell introduced himself.

Name	Integral equations (SI convention)	Differential equations (SI convention)	Differential equations (Gaussian convention)
Gauss's law	$\oiint$ ${\scriptstyle \partial \Omega }$ $\mathbf {D} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} =\iiint _{\Omega }\rho _{\text{f}}\,\mathrm {d} V$	$\nabla \cdot \mathbf {D} =\rho _{\text{f}}$	$\nabla \cdot \mathbf {D} =4\pi \rho _{\text{f}}$
Gauss's law for magnetism	$\oiint$ ${\scriptstyle \partial \Omega }$ $\mathbf {B} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} =0$	$\nabla \cdot \mathbf {B} =0$	$\nabla \cdot \mathbf {B} =0$
Maxwell–Faraday equation (Faraday's law of induction)	$\oint _{\partial \Sigma }\mathbf {E} \cdot \mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}=-{\frac {d}{dt}}\iint _{\Sigma }\mathbf {B} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S}$	$\nabla \times \mathbf {E} =-{\frac {\partial \mathbf {B} }{\partial t}}$	$\nabla \times \mathbf {E} =-{\frac {1}{c}}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {B} }{\partial t}}$
Ampère's circuital law (with Maxwell's addition)	${\begin{aligned}\oint _{\partial \Sigma }&\mathbf {H} \cdot \mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}=\\&\iint _{\Sigma }\mathbf {J} _{\text{f}}\cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} +{\frac {d}{dt}}\iint _{\Sigma }\mathbf {D} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} \\\end{aligned}}$	$\nabla \times \mathbf {H} =\mathbf {J} _{\text{f}}+{\frac {\partial \mathbf {D} }{\partial t}}$	$\nabla \times \mathbf {H} ={\frac {1}{c}}\left(4\pi \mathbf {J} _{\text{f}}+{\frac {\partial \mathbf {D} }{\partial t}}\right)$

In the "macroscopic" equations, the influence of bound charge $Q b$ and bound current $I b$ is incorporated into the displacement field $D$ and the magnetizing field $H$ , while the equations depend only on the free charges $Q f$ and free currents $I f$ . This reflects a splitting of the total electric charge Q and current I (and their densities ρ and J) into free and bound parts:

{\begin{aligned}Q&=Q_{\text{f}}+Q_{\text{b}}=\iiint _{\Omega }\left(\rho _{\text{f}}+\rho _{\text{b}}\right)\,\mathrm {d} V=\iiint _{\Omega }\rho \,\mathrm {d} V\\I&=I_{\text{f}}+I_{\text{b}}=\iint _{\Sigma }\left(\mathbf {J} _{\text{f}}+\mathbf {J} _{\text{b}}\right)\cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} =\iint _{\Sigma }\mathbf {J} \cdot \mathrm {d} \mathbf {S} \end{aligned}}

The cost of this splitting is that the additional fields $D$ and $H$ need to be determined through phenomenological constituent equations relating these fields to the electric field $E$ and the magnetic field $B$ , together with the bound charge and current.

See below for a detailed description of the differences between the microscopic equations, dealing with total charge and current including material contributions, useful in air/vacuum;^{[note 4]} and the macroscopic equations, dealing with free charge and current, practical to use within materials.

Bound charge and current

Left: A schematic view of how an assembly of microscopic dipoles produces opposite surface charges as shown at top and bottom. Right: How an assembly of microscopic current loops add together to produce a macroscopically circulating current loop. Inside the boundaries, the individual contributions tend to cancel, but at the boundaries no cancelation occurs.

When an electric field is applied to a dielectric material its molecules respond by forming microscopic electric dipoles – their atomic nuclei move a tiny distance in the direction of the field, while their electrons move a tiny distance in the opposite direction. This produces a macroscopic bound charge in the material even though all of the charges involved are bound to individual molecules. For example, if every molecule responds the same, similar to that shown in the figure, these tiny movements of charge combine to produce a layer of positive bound charge on one side of the material and a layer of negative charge on the other side. The bound charge is most conveniently described in terms of the polarization $P$ of the material, its dipole moment per unit volume. If $P$ is uniform, a macroscopic separation of charge is produced only at the surfaces where $P$ enters and leaves the material. For non-uniform $P$ , a charge is also produced in the bulk.^[11]

Somewhat similarly, in all materials the constituent atoms exhibit magnetic moments that are intrinsically linked to the angular momentum of the components of the atoms, most notably their electrons. The connection to angular momentum suggests the picture of an assembly of microscopic current loops. Outside the material, an assembly of such microscopic current loops is not different from a macroscopic current circulating around the material's surface, despite the fact that no individual charge is traveling a large distance. These bound currents can be described using the magnetization $M$ .^[12]

The very complicated and granular bound charges and bound currents, therefore, can be represented on the macroscopic scale in terms of $P$ and $M$ , which average these charges and currents on a sufficiently large scale so as not to see the granularity of individual atoms, but also sufficiently small that they vary with location in the material. As such, Maxwell's macroscopic equations ignore many details on a fine scale that can be unimportant to understanding matters on a gross scale by calculating fields that are averaged over some suitable volume.

Auxiliary fields, polarization and magnetization

The definitions (not constitutive relations) of the auxiliary fields are:

{\begin{aligned}\mathbf {D} (\mathbf {r} ,t)&=\varepsilon _{0}\mathbf {E} (\mathbf {r} ,t)+\mathbf {P} (\mathbf {r} ,t)\\\mathbf {H} (\mathbf {r} ,t)&={\frac {1}{\mu _{0}}}\mathbf {B} (\mathbf {r} ,t)-\mathbf {M} (\mathbf {r} ,t)\end{aligned}}

where $P$ is the polarization field and $M$ is the magnetization field, which are defined in terms of microscopic bound charges and bound currents respectively. The macroscopic bound charge density $ρ b$ and bound current density $J b$ in terms of polarization $P$ and magnetization $M$ are then defined as

{\begin{aligned}\rho _{\text{b}}&=-\nabla \cdot \mathbf {P} \\\mathbf {J} _{\text{b}}&=\nabla \times \mathbf {M} +{\frac {\partial \mathbf {P} }{\partial t}}\end{aligned}}

If we define the total, bound, and free charge and current density by

{\begin{aligned}\rho &=\rho _{\text{b}}+\rho _{\text{f}},\\\mathbf {J} &=\mathbf {J} _{\text{b}}+\mathbf {J} _{\text{f}},\end{aligned}}

and use the defining relations above to eliminate $D$ , and $H$ , the "macroscopic" Maxwell's equations reproduce the "microscopic" equations.

Constitutive relations

In order to apply 'Maxwell's macroscopic equations', it is necessary to specify the relations between displacement field $D$ and the electric field $E$ , as well as the magnetizing field $H$ and the magnetic field $B$ . Equivalently, we have to specify the dependence of the polarisation $P$ (hence the bound charge) and the magnetisation $M$ (hence the bound current) on the applied electric and magnetic field. The equations specifying this response are called constitutive relations. For real-world materials, the constitutive relations are rarely simple, except approximately, and usually determined by experiment. See the main article on constitutive relations for a fuller description.^[13]^:44–45

For materials without polarization and magnetisation, the constitutive relations are (by definition)^[7]^:2

\mathbf {D} =\varepsilon _{0}\mathbf {E} ,\quad \mathbf {H} ={\frac {1}{\mu _{0}}}\mathbf {B}

where $ε 0$ is the permittivity of free space and $μ 0$ the permeability of free space. Since there is no bound charge, the total and the free charge and current are equal.

An alternative viewpoint on the microscopic equations is that they are the macroscopic equations together with the statement that vacuum behaves like a perfect linear "material" without additional polarisation and magnetisation. More generally, for linear materials the constitutive relations are^[13]^:44–45

\mathbf {D} =\varepsilon \mathbf {E} \,,\quad \mathbf {H} ={\frac {1}{\mu }}\mathbf {B}

where $ε$ is the permittivity and $μ$ the permeability of the material. For the displacement field $D$ the linear approximation is usually excellent because for all but the most extreme electric fields or temperatures obtainable in the laboratory (high power pulsed lasers) the interatomic electric fields of materials of the order of 10¹¹ V/m are much higher than the external field. For the magnetizing field $\mathbf{H}$ , however, the linear approximation can break down in common materials like iron leading to phenomena like hysteresis. Even the linear case can have various complications, however.

For homogeneous materials, $ε$ and $μ$ are constant throughout the material, while for inhomogeneous materials they depend on location within the material (and perhaps time).^[14]^:463
For isotropic materials, $ε$ and $μ$ are scalars, while for anisotropic materials (e.g. due to crystal structure) they are tensors.^[13]^:421^[14]^:463
Materials are generally dispersive, so $ε$ and $μ$ depend on the frequency of any incident EM waves.^[13]^:625^[14]^:397

Even more generally, in the case of non-linear materials (see for example nonlinear optics), $D$ and $P$ are not necessarily proportional to $E$ , similarly $H$ or $M$ is not necessarily proportional to $B$ . In general $D$ and $H$ depend on both $E$ and $B$ , on location and time, and possibly other physical quantities.

In applications one also has to describe how the free currents and charge density behave in terms of $E$ and $B$ possibly coupled to other physical quantities like pressure, and the mass, number density, and velocity of charge-carrying particles. E.g., the original equations given by Maxwell (see History of Maxwell's equations) included Ohms law in the form

\mathbf {J} _{\text{f}}=\sigma \mathbf {E} \,.

Alternative formulations

Following is a summary of some of the numerous other mathematical formalisms to write the microscopic Maxwell's equations, with the columns separating the two homogeneous Maxwell equations from the two inhomogeneous ones involving charge and current. Each formulation has versions directly in terms of the electric and magnetic fields, and indirectly in terms of the electrical potential $φ$ and the vector potential $A$ . Potentials were introduced as a convenient way to solve the homogeneous equations, but it was thought that all observable physics was contained in the electric and magnetic fields (or relativistically, the Faraday tensor). The potentials play a central role in quantum mechanics, however, and act quantum mechanically with observable consequences even when the electric and magnetic fields vanish (Aharonov–Bohm effect).

Each table describes one formalism. See the main article for details of each formulation. SI units are used throughout.

Vector calculus
Formulation	Homogeneous equations	Inhomogeneous equations
Fields 3D Euclidean space + time	${\begin{aligned}\nabla \cdot \mathbf {B} =0\end{aligned}}$ ${\begin{aligned}\nabla \times \mathbf {E} +{\frac {\partial \mathbf {B} }{\partial t}}=0\end{aligned}}$	${\begin{aligned}\nabla \cdot \mathbf {E} &={\frac {\rho }{\varepsilon _{0}}}\end{aligned}}$ ${\begin{aligned}\nabla \times \mathbf {B} -{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial \mathbf {E} }{\partial t}}&=\mu _{0}\mathbf {J} \end{aligned}}$
Potentials (any gauge) 3D Euclidean space + time	${\begin{aligned}\mathbf {B} &=\mathbf {\nabla } \times \mathbf {A} \end{aligned}}$ ${\begin{aligned}\mathbf {E} &=-\mathbf {\nabla } \varphi -{\frac {\partial \mathbf {A} }{\partial t}}\end{aligned}}$	${\begin{aligned}-\nabla ^{2}\varphi -{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\left(\mathbf {\nabla } \cdot \mathbf {A} \right)&={\frac {\rho }{\varepsilon _{0}}}\end{aligned}}$ ${\begin{aligned}\left(-\nabla ^{2}+{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}\right)\mathbf {A} +\mathbf {\nabla } \left(\mathbf {\nabla } \cdot \mathbf {A} +{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial \varphi }{\partial t}}\right)&=\mu _{0}\mathbf {J} \end{aligned}}$
Potentials (Lorenz gauge) 3D Euclidean space + time	${\begin{aligned}\mathbf {B} &=\mathbf {\nabla } \times \mathbf {A} \\\end{aligned}}$ ${\begin{aligned}\mathbf {E} &=-\mathbf {\nabla } \varphi -{\frac {\partial \mathbf {A} }{\partial t}}\\\end{aligned}}$ ${\begin{aligned}\mathbf {\nabla } \cdot \mathbf {A} &=-{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial \varphi }{\partial t}}\\\end{aligned}}$	${\begin{aligned}\left(-\nabla ^{2}+{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}\right)\varphi &={\frac {\rho }{\varepsilon _{0}}}\end{aligned}}$ ${\begin{aligned}\left(-\nabla ^{2}+{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}\right)\mathbf {A} &=\mu _{0}\mathbf {J} \end{aligned}}$

Tensor calculus
Formulation	Homogeneous equations	Inhomogeneous equations
Fields space + time spatial metric independent of time	${\begin{aligned}\partial _{[i}B_{jk]}&=\\\nabla _{[i}B_{jk]}&=0\\\partial _{[i}E_{j]}+{\frac {\partial B_{ij}}{\partial t}}&=\\\nabla _{[i}E_{j]}+{\frac {\partial B_{ij}}{\partial t}}&=0\end{aligned}}$	${\begin{aligned}{\frac {1}{\sqrt {h}}}\partial _{i}{\sqrt {h}}E^{i}&=\\\nabla _{i}E^{i}&={\frac {\rho }{\epsilon _{0}}}\\-{\frac {1}{\sqrt {h}}}\partial _{i}{\sqrt {h}}B^{ij}-{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}E^{j}&=&\\-\nabla _{i}B^{ij}-{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial E^{j}}{\partial t}}&=\mu _{0}J^{j}\\\end{aligned}}$
Potentials space (with topological restrictions) + time spatial metric independent of time	${\begin{aligned}B_{ij}&=\partial _{[i}A_{j]}\\&=\nabla _{[i}A_{j]}\end{aligned}}$ ${\begin{aligned}E_{i}&=-{\frac {\partial A_{i}}{\partial t}}-\partial _{i}\phi \\&=-{\frac {\partial A_{i}}{\partial t}}-\nabla _{i}\phi \\\end{aligned}}$	${\begin{aligned}-{\frac {1}{\sqrt {h}}}\partial _{i}{\sqrt {h}}\left(\partial ^{i}\phi +{\frac {\partial A^{i}}{\partial t}}\right)&=\\-\nabla _{i}\nabla ^{i}\phi -{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\nabla _{i}A^{i}&={\frac {\rho }{\epsilon _{0}}}\\-{\frac {1}{\sqrt {h}}}\partial _{i}\left({\sqrt {h}}h^{im}h^{jn}\partial _{[m}A_{n]}\right)+{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\left({\frac {\partial A^{j}}{\partial t}}+\partial ^{j}\phi \right)&=\\-\nabla _{i}\nabla ^{i}A^{j}+{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}A^{j}}{\partial t^{2}}}+R_{i}^{j}A^{i}+\nabla ^{j}\left(\nabla _{i}A^{i}+{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial \phi }{\partial t}}\right)&=\mu _{0}J^{j}\\\end{aligned}}$
Potentials (Lorenz gauge) space (with topological restrictions) + time spatial metric independent of time	${\begin{aligned}B_{ij}&=\partial _{[i}A_{j]}\\&=\nabla _{[i}A_{j]}\\E_{i}&=-{\frac {\partial A_{i}}{\partial t}}-\partial _{i}\phi \\&=-{\frac {\partial A_{i}}{\partial t}}-\nabla _{i}\phi \\\nabla _{i}A^{i}&=-{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial \phi }{\partial t}}\\\end{aligned}}$	${\begin{aligned}-\nabla _{i}\nabla ^{i}\phi +{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial t^{2}}}&={\frac {\rho }{\epsilon _{0}}}\\-\nabla _{i}\nabla ^{i}A^{j}+{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}A^{j}}{\partial t^{2}}}+R_{i}^{j}A^{i}&=\mu _{0}J^{j}\\\end{aligned}}$

Differential forms
Formulation	Homogeneous equations	Inhomogeneous equations
Fields Any space + time	${\begin{aligned}dB&=0\\dE+{\frac {\partial B}{\partial t}}&=0\\\end{aligned}}$	${\begin{aligned}dE={\frac {\rho }{\epsilon _{0}}}\\dB-{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial *E}{\partial t}}={\mu _{0}}J\\\end{aligned}}$
Potentials (any gauge) Any space (with topological restrictions) + time	${\begin{aligned}B&=dA\\E&=-d\phi -{\frac {\partial A}{\partial t}}\\\end{aligned}}$	${\begin{aligned}-d\left(d\phi +{\frac {\partial A}{\partial t}}\right)&={\frac {\rho }{\epsilon _{0}}}\\ddA+{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}*\left(d\phi +{\frac {\partial A}{\partial t}}\right)&=\mu _{0}J\\\end{aligned}}$
Potential (Lorenz Gauge) Any space (with topological restrictions) + time spatial metric independent of time	${\begin{aligned}B&=dA\\E&=-d\phi -{\frac {\partial A}{\partial t}}\\dA&=-{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial \phi }{\partial t}}\\\end{aligned}}$	${\begin{aligned}\left(-\Delta \phi +{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}}\phi \right)&={\frac {\rho }{\epsilon _{0}}}\\\left(-\Delta A+{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}A}{\partial ^{2}t}}\right)&=\mu _{0}J\\\end{aligned}}$

Relativistic formulations

The Maxwell equations can also be formulated on a spacetime-like Minkowski space where space and time are treated on equal footing. The direct spacetime formulations make manifest that the Maxwell equations are relativistically invariant. Because of this symmetry electric and magnetic field are treated on equal footing and are recognised as components of the Faraday tensor. This reduces the four Maxwell equations to two, which simplifies the equations, although we can no longer use the familiar vector formulation. In fact the Maxwell equations in the space + time formulation are not Galileo invariant and have Lorentz invariance as a hidden symmetry. This was a major source of inspiration for the development of relativity theory. To repeat: the space + time formulation is not a non-relativistic approximation and it describes the same physics by simply renaming variables. For this reason the relativistic invariant equations are usually called the Maxwell equations as well.

Each table describes one formalism.

Tensor calculus
Formulation	Homogeneous equations	Inhomogeneous equations
Fields Minkowski space	$\partial _{[\alpha }F_{\beta \gamma ]}=0$	$\partial _{\alpha }F^{\alpha \beta }=\mu _{0}J^{\beta }$
Potentials (any gauge) Minkowski space	$F_{\alpha \beta }=2\partial _{[\alpha }A_{\beta ]}$	$2\partial _{\alpha }\partial ^{[\alpha }A^{\beta ]}=\mu _{0}J^{\beta }$
Potentials (Lorenz gauge) Minkowski space	${\begin{aligned}F_{\alpha \beta }&=2\partial _{[\alpha }A_{\beta ]}\\\partial _{\alpha }A^{\alpha }&=0\end{aligned}}$	$\partial _{\alpha }\partial ^{\alpha }A^{\beta }=\mu _{0}J^{\beta }$
Fields Any spacetime	${\begin{aligned}\partial _{[\alpha }F_{\beta \gamma ]}&=\\\nabla _{[\alpha }F_{\beta \gamma ]}&=0\end{aligned}}$	${\begin{aligned}{\frac {1}{\sqrt {-g}}}\partial _{\alpha }({\sqrt {-g}}F^{\alpha \beta })&=\\\nabla _{\alpha }F^{\alpha \beta }&=\mu _{0}J^{\beta }\end{aligned}}$
Potentials (any gauge) Any spacetime (with topological restrictions)	${\begin{aligned}F_{\alpha \beta }&=2\partial _{[\alpha }A_{\beta ]}\\&=2\nabla _{[\alpha }A_{\beta ]}\end{aligned}}$	${\begin{aligned}{\frac {2}{\sqrt {-g}}}\partial _{\alpha }({\sqrt {-g}}g^{\alpha \mu }g^{\beta \nu }\partial _{[\mu }A_{\nu ]})&=\\2\nabla _{\alpha }(\nabla ^{[\alpha }A^{\beta ]})&=\mu _{0}J^{\beta }\end{aligned}}$
Potentials (Lorenz gauge) Any spacetime (with topological restrictions)	${\begin{aligned}F_{\alpha \beta }&=2\partial _{[\alpha }A_{\beta ]}\\&=2\nabla _{[\alpha }A_{\beta ]}\\\nabla _{\alpha }A^{\alpha }&=0\end{aligned}}$	$\nabla _{\alpha }\nabla ^{\alpha }A^{\beta }-R^{\beta }{}_{\alpha }A^{\alpha }=\mu _{0}J^{\beta }$

Differential forms
Formulation	Homogeneous equations	Inhomogeneous equations
Fields Any spacetime	$\mathrm {d} F=0$	$\mathrm {d} {\star }F=\mu _{0}J$
Potentials (any gauge) Any spacetime (with topological restrictions)	$F=\mathrm {d} A$	$\mathrm {d} {\star }\mathrm {d} A=\mu _{0}J$
Potentials (Lorenz gauge) Any spacetime (with topological restrictions)	${\begin{aligned}F&=\mathrm {d} A\\\mathrm {d} {\star }A&=0\end{aligned}}$	${\star }\Box A=\mu _{0}J$

In the tensor calculus formulation, the electromagnetic tensor $F αβ$ is an antisymmetric covariant order 2 tensor; the four-potential, $A α$ , is a covariant vector; the current, $J α$ , is a vector; the square brackets, $[ ]$ , denote antisymmetrization of indices; $\partial α$ is the derivative with respect to the coordinate, $x α$ . In Minkowski space coordinates are chosen with respect to an inertial frame; $(x α) = (ct, x, y, z)$ , so that the metric tensor used to raise and lower indices is $η αβ = diag(1,-1,-1,-1)$ . The d'Alembert operator on Minkowski space is $◻ = \partial α \partial α$ as in the vector formulation. In general spacetimes, the coordinate system $x α$ is arbitrary, the covariant derivative $\nabla α$ , the Ricci tensor, $R αβ$ and raising and lowering of indices are defined by the Lorentzian metric, $g αβ$ and the d'Alembert operator is defined as $◻ = \nabla α \nabla α$ . The topological restriction is that the second real cohomology group of the space vanishes (see the differential form formulation for an explanation). Note that this is violated for Minkowski space with a line removed, which can model a (flat) spacetime with a point-like monopole on the complement of the line.
In the differential form formulation on arbitrary space times, $F = F αβ d x α \land d x β$ is the electromagnetic tensor considered as a 2-form, $A = A α d x α$ is the potential 1-form, $J$ is the current 3-form, $d$ is the exterior derivative, and ${\star }$ is the Hodge star on forms defined (up to its an orientation, i.e. its sign) by the Lorentzian metric of spacetime. Note that in the special case of 2-forms such as F, the Hodge star ${\star }$ depends on the metric tensor only for its local scale. This means that, as formulated, the differential form field equations are conformally invariant, but the Lorenz gauge condition breaks conformal invariance. The operator $\Box =(-{\star }\mathrm {d} {\star }\mathrm {d} -\mathrm {d} {\star }\mathrm {d} {\star })$ is the d'Alembert–Laplace–Beltrami operator on 1-forms on an arbitrary Lorentzian spacetime. The topological condition is again that the second real cohomology group is trivial. By the isomorphism with the second de Rham cohomology this condition means that every closed 2-form is exact.

Other formalisms include the geometric algebra formulation and a matrix representation of Maxwell's equations. Historically, a quaternionic formulation^[15]^[16] was used.

Solutions

Maxwell's equations are partial differential equations that relate the electric and magnetic fields to each other and to the electric charges and currents. Often, the charges and currents are themselves dependent on the electric and magnetic fields via the Lorentz force equation and the constitutive relations. These all form a set of coupled partial differential equations which are often very difficult to solve: the solutions encompass all the diverse phenomena of classical electromagnetism. Some general remarks follow.

As for any differential equation, boundary conditions^[17]^[18]^[19] and initial conditions^[20] are necessary for a unique solution. For example, even with no charges and no currents anywhere in spacetime, there are the obvious solutions for which E and B are zero or constant, but there are also non-trivial solutions corresponding to electromagnetic waves. In some cases, Maxwell's equations are solved over the whole of space, and boundary conditions are given as asymptotic limits at infinity.^[21] In other cases, Maxwell's equations are solved in a finite region of space, with appropriate conditions on the boundary of that region, for example an artificial absorbing boundary representing the rest of the universe,^[22]^[23] or periodic boundary conditions, or walls that isolate a small region from the outside world (as with a waveguide or cavity resonator).^[24]

Jefimenko's equations (or the closely related Liénard–Wiechert potentials) are the explicit solution to Maxwell's equations for the electric and magnetic fields created by any given distribution of charges and currents. It assumes specific initial conditions to obtain the so-called "retarded solution", where the only fields present are the ones created by the charges. However, Jefimenko's equations are unhelpful in situations when the charges and currents are themselves affected by the fields they create.

Numerical methods for differential equations can be used to compute approximate solutions of Maxwell's equations when exact solutions are impossible. These include the finite element method and finite-difference time-domain method.^[17]^[19]^[25]^[26]^[27] For more details, see Computational electromagnetics.

Overdetermination of Maxwell's equations

Maxwell's equations seem overdetermined, in that they involve six unknowns (the three components of $E$ and $B$ ) but eight equations (one for each of the two Gauss's laws, three vector components each for Faraday's and Ampere's laws). (The currents and charges are not unknowns, being freely specifiable subject to charge conservation.) This is related to a certain limited kind of redundancy in Maxwell's equations: It can be proven that any system satisfying Faraday's law and Ampere's law automatically also satisfies the two Gauss's laws, as long as the system's initial condition does.^[28]^[29] This explanation was first introduced by Julius Adams Stratton in 1941.^[30] Although it is possible to simply ignore the two Gauss's laws in a numerical algorithm (apart from the initial conditions), the imperfect precision of the calculations can lead to ever-increasing violations of those laws. By introducing dummy variables characterizing these violations, the four equations become not overdetermined after all. The resulting formulation can lead to more accurate algorithms that take all four laws into account.^[31]

Both identities $\nabla \cdot \nabla \times \mathbf {B} \equiv 0,\nabla \cdot \nabla \times \mathbf {E} \equiv 0$ , which reduce eight equations to six independent ones, are the true reason of overdetermination.^[32]^:161–162^[33]^[34]

Maxwell equations as the classical limit of QED

Maxwell's equations and the Lorentz force law (along with the rest of classical electromagnetism) are extraordinarily successful at explaining and predicting a variety of phenomena; however they are not exact, but a classical limit of quantum electrodynamics (QED).

Some observed electromagnetic phenomena are incompatible with Maxwell's equations. These include photon–photon scattering and many other phenomena related to photons or virtual photons, "nonclassical light" and quantum entanglement of electromagnetic fields (see quantum optics). E.g. quantum cryptography cannot be described by Maxwell theory, not even approximately. The approximate nature of Maxwell's equations becomes more and more apparent when going into the extremely strong field regime (see Euler–Heisenberg Lagrangian) or to extremely small distances.

Finally, Maxwell's equations cannot explain any phenomenon involving individual photons interacting with quantum matter, such as the photoelectric effect, Planck's law, the Duane–Hunt law, and single-photon light detectors. However, many such phenomena may be approximated using a halfway theory of quantum matter coupled to a classical electromagnetic field, either as external field or with the expected value of the charge current and density on the right hand side of Maxwell's equations.

Variations

Popular variations on the Maxwell equations as a classical theory of electromagnetic fields are relatively scarce because the standard equations have stood the test of time remarkably well.

Magnetic monopoles

Maxwell's equations posit that there is electric charge, but no magnetic charge (also called magnetic monopoles), in the universe. Indeed, magnetic charge has never been observed (despite extensive searches)^{[note 5]} and may not exist. If they did exist, both Gauss's law for magnetism and Faraday's law would need to be modified, and the resulting four equations would be fully symmetric under the interchange of electric and magnetic fields.^[7]^:273–275

Notes

↑ Maxwell's equations in any form are compatible with relativity. These spacetime formulations, though, make that compatibility more readily apparent by revealing that the electric and magnetic fields blend into a single tensor, and that their distinction depends on the movement of the observer and the corresponding observer dependent notion of time.
↑ The quantity we would now call $ 1 ⁄ \sqrt ε 0 μ 0$ , with units of velocity, was directly measured before Maxwell's equations, in an 1855 experiment by Wilhelm Eduard Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch. They charged a leyden jar (a kind of capacitor), and measured the electrostatic force associated with the potential; then, they discharged it while measuring the magnetic force from the current in the discharge wire. Their result was 7008310700000000000♠3.107×10⁸ m/s, remarkably close to the speed of light. See Joseph F. Keithley, The story of electrical and magnetic measurements: from 500 B.C. to the 1940s, p. 115
↑ There are cases (anomalous dispersion) where the phase velocity can exceed $c$ , but the "signal velocity" will still be $< c$
↑ In some books—e.g., in U. Krey and A. Owen's Basic Theoretical Physics (Springer 2007)—the term effective charge is used instead of total charge, while free charge is simply called charge.
↑ See magnetic monopole for a discussion of monopole searches. Recently, scientists have discovered that some types of condensed matter, including spin ice and topological insulators, which display emergent behavior resembling magnetic monopoles. (See sciencemag.org and nature.com.) Although these were described in the popular press as the long-awaited discovery of magnetic monopoles, they are only superficially related. A "true" magnetic monopole is something where $\nabla \cdot B \neq 0$ , whereas in these condensed-matter systems, $\nabla \cdot B = 0$ while only $\nabla \cdot H \neq 0$ .

References

1 2 3 Jackson, John. "Maxwell's equations". Science Video Glossary. Berkeley Lab.
↑ J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, section 6.3
↑ Principles of physics: a calculus-based text, by R. A. Serway, J. W. Jewett, page 809.
↑ Bruce J. Hunt (1991) The Maxwellians, chapter 5 and appendix, Cornell University Press
↑ "IEEEGHN: Maxwell's Equations". Ieeeghn.org. Retrieved 2008-10-19.
↑ Šolín, Pavel (2006). Partial differential equations and the finite element method. John Wiley and Sons. p. 273. ISBN 0-471-72070-4.
1 2 3 J. D. Jackson. Classical Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). ISBN 0-471-43132-X.
↑ Littlejohn, Robert (Fall 2007). "Gaussian, SI and Other Systems of Units in Electromagnetic Theory" (PDF). Physics 221A, University of California, Berkeley lecture notes. Retrieved 2008-05-06.
↑ David J Griffiths (1999). Introduction to electrodynamics (Third ed.). Prentice Hall. pp. 559–562. ISBN 0-13-805326-X.
↑ Kimball Milton; J. Schwinger (18 June 2006). Electromagnetic Radiation: Variational Methods, Waveguides and Accelerators. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-3-540-29306-4.
↑ See David J. Griffiths (1999). "4.2.2". Introduction to Electrodynamics (third ed.). Prentice Hall. for a good description of how $P$ relates to the bound charge.
↑ See David J. Griffiths (1999). "6.2.2". Introduction to Electrodynamics (third ed.). Prentice Hall. for a good description of how $M$ relates to the bound current.
1 2 3 4 Andrew Zangwill (2013). Modern Electrodynamics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-89697-9.
1 2 3 Kittel, Charles (2005), Introduction to Solid State Physics (8th ed.), USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ISBN 978-0-471-41526-8
↑ P.M. Jack (2003). "Physical Space as a Quaternion Structure I: Maxwell Equations. A Brief Note". Toronto, Canada. arXiv:math-ph/0307038. Bibcode:2003math.ph...7038J.
↑ A. Waser (2000). "On the Notation of Maxwell's Field Equations" (PDF). AW-Verlag.
1 2 Peter Monk (2003). Finite Element Methods for Maxwell's Equations. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. p. 1 ff. ISBN 0-19-850888-3.
↑ Thomas B. A. Senior & John Leonidas Volakis (1995-03-01). Approximate Boundary Conditions in Electromagnetics. London UK: Institution of Electrical Engineers. p. 261 ff. ISBN 0-85296-849-3.
1 2 T Hagstrom (Björn Engquist & Gregory A. Kriegsmann, Eds.) (1997). Computational Wave Propagation. Berlin: Springer. p. 1 ff. ISBN 0-387-94874-0.
↑ Henning F. Harmuth & Malek G. M. Hussain (1994). Propagation of Electromagnetic Signals. Singapore: World Scientific. p. 17. ISBN 981-02-1689-0.
↑ David M Cook (2002). The Theory of the Electromagnetic Field. Mineola NY: Courier Dover Publications. p. 335 ff. ISBN 0-486-42567-3.
↑ Jean-Michel Lourtioz (2005-05-23). Photonic Crystals: Towards Nanoscale Photonic Devices. Berlin: Springer. p. 84. ISBN 3-540-24431-X.
↑ S. G. Johnson, Notes on Perfectly Matched Layers, online MIT course notes (Aug. 2007).
↑ S. F. Mahmoud (1991). Electromagnetic Waveguides: Theory and Applications. London UK: Institution of Electrical Engineers. Chapter 2. ISBN 0-86341-232-7.
↑ John Leonidas Volakis, Arindam Chatterjee & Leo C. Kempel (1998). Finite element method for electromagnetics : antennas, microwave circuits, and scattering applications. New York: Wiley IEEE. p. 79 ff. ISBN 0-7803-3425-6.
↑ Bernard Friedman (1990). Principles and Techniques of Applied Mathematics. Mineola NY: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-66444-9.
↑ Taflove A & Hagness S C (2005). Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-difference Time-domain Method. Boston MA: Artech House. Chapters 6 & 7. ISBN 1-58053-832-0.
↑ H Freistühler & G Warnecke (2001). Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications. p. 605.
↑ J Rosen. "Redundancy and superfluity for electromagnetic fields and potentials". American Journal of Physics. 48 (12): 1071. Bibcode:1980AmJPh..48.1071R. doi:10.1119/1.12289.
↑ J. A. Stratton (1941). Electromagnetic Theory. McGraw-Hill Book Company. pp. 1–6.
↑ B Jiang & J Wu & L. A. Povinelli (1996). "The Origin of Spurious Solutions in Computational Electromagnetics". Journal of Computational Physics. 125 (1): 104. Bibcode:1996JCoPh.125..104J. doi:10.1006/jcph.1996.0082.
↑ Weinberg, Steven (1972). Gravitation and Cosmology. John Wiley. ISBN 0-471-92567-5.
↑ Liu, Changli. "Explanation on Overdetermination of Maxwell's Equations". arXiv:1002.0892.
↑ Arminjon, Mayeul (2018). "On the equations of electrodynamics in a flat or curved spacetime and a possible interaction energy". Open Physics. 16 (1): 488. doi:10.1515/phys-2018-0065.

Further reading can be found in list of textbooks in electromagnetism

Historical publications

On Faraday's Lines of Force – 1855/56 Maxwell's first paper (Part 1 & 2) – Compiled by Blaze Labs Research (PDF)
On Physical Lines of Force – 1861 Maxwell's 1861 paper describing magnetic lines of Force – Predecessor to 1873 Treatise
James Clerk Maxwell, "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 155, 459–512 (1865). (This article accompanied a December 8, 1864 presentation by Maxwell to the Royal Society.)
- A Dynamical Theory Of The Electromagnetic Field – 1865 Maxwell's 1865 paper describing his 20 Equations, link from Google Books.
J. Clerk Maxwell (1873) A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism
- Maxwell, J.C., A Treatise on Electricity And Magnetism – Volume 1 – 1873 – Posner Memorial Collection – Carnegie Mellon University
- Maxwell, J.C., A Treatise on Electricity And Magnetism – Volume 2 – 1873 – Posner Memorial Collection – Carnegie Mellon University

The developments before relativity:

Joseph Larmor (1897) "On a dynamical theory of the electric and luminiferous medium", Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 190, 205–300 (third and last in a series of papers with the same name).
Hendrik Lorentz (1899) "Simplified theory of electrical and optical phenomena in moving systems", Proc. Acad. Science Amsterdam, I, 427–43.
Hendrik Lorentz (1904) "Electromagnetic phenomena in a system moving with any velocity less than that of light", Proc. Acad. Science Amsterdam, IV, 669–78.
Henri Poincaré (1900) "La théorie de Lorentz et le Principe de Réaction", Archives Néerlandaises, V, 253–78.
Henri Poincaré (1902) La Science et l'Hypothèse
Henri Poincaré (1905) "Sur la dynamique de l'électron", Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 140, 1504–8.
Catt, Walton and Davidson. "The History of Displacement Current". Wireless World, March 1979.

External links

Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001) [1994], "Maxwell equations", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. / Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4
maxwells-equations.com — An intuitive tutorial of Maxwell's equations.
Mathematical aspects of Maxwell's equation are discussed on the Dispersive PDE Wiki.

Modern treatments

Electromagnetism (ch. 11), B. Crowell, Fullerton College
Lecture series: Relativity and electromagnetism, R. Fitzpatrick, University of Texas at Austin
Electromagnetic waves from Maxwell's equations on Project PHYSNET.
MIT Video Lecture Series (36 × 50 minute lectures) (in .mp4 format) – Electricity and Magnetism Taught by Professor Walter Lewin.

Other

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] Maxwell's equations in any form are compatible with relativity. These spacetime formulations, though, make that compatibility more readily apparent by revealing that the electric and magnetic fields blend into a single tensor, and that their distinction depends on the movement of the observer and the corresponding observer dependent notion of time.

[5] The quantity we would now call $ 1 ⁄ \sqrt ε 0 μ 0$ , with units of velocity, was directly measured before Maxwell's equations, in an 1855 experiment by Wilhelm Eduard Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch. They charged a leyden jar (a kind of capacitor), and measured the electrostatic force associated with the potential; then, they discharged it while measuring the magnetic force from the current in the discharge wire. Their result was 7008310700000000000♠3.107×10⁸ m/s, remarkably close to the speed of light. See Joseph F. Keithley, The story of electrical and magnetic measurements: from 500 B.C. to the 1940s, p. 115

[12] There are cases (anomalous dispersion) where the phase velocity can exceed $c$ , but the "signal velocity" will still be $< c$

[Effective_charge-14] In some books—e.g., in U. Krey and A. Owen's Basic Theoretical Physics (Springer 2007)—the term effective charge is used instead of total charge, while free charge is simply called charge.

[39] See magnetic monopole for a discussion of monopole searches. Recently, scientists have discovered that some types of condensed matter, including spin ice and topological insulators, which display emergent behavior resembling magnetic monopoles. (See sciencemag.org and nature.com.) Although these were described in the popular press as the long-awaited discovery of magnetic monopoles, they are only superficially related. A "true" magnetic monopole is something where $\nabla \cdot B \neq 0$ , whereas in these condensed-matter systems, $\nabla \cdot B = 0$ while only $\nabla \cdot H \neq 0$ .

[VideoGlossary-2] 1 2 3 Jackson, John. "Maxwell's equations". Science Video Glossary. Berkeley Lab.

[3] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, section 6.3

[4] Principles of physics: a calculus-based text, by R. A. Serway, J. W. Jewett, page 809.

[6] Bruce J. Hunt (1991) The Maxwellians, chapter 5 and appendix, Cornell University Press

[7] "IEEEGHN: Maxwell's Equations". Ieeeghn.org. Retrieved 2008-10-19.

[8] Šolín, Pavel (2006). Partial differential equations and the finite element method. John Wiley and Sons. p. 273. ISBN 0-471-72070-4.

[Jackson-9] 1 2 3 J. D. Jackson. Classical Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). ISBN 0-471-43132-X.

[Littlejohn-10] Littlejohn, Robert (Fall 2007). "Gaussian, SI and Other Systems of Units in Electromagnetic Theory" (PDF). Physics 221A, University of California, Berkeley lecture notes. Retrieved 2008-05-06.

[Griffiths-11] David J Griffiths (1999). Introduction to electrodynamics (Third ed.). Prentice Hall. pp. 559–562. ISBN 0-13-805326-X.

[MiltonSchwinger2006-13] Kimball Milton; J. Schwinger (18 June 2006). Electromagnetic Radiation: Variational Methods, Waveguides and Accelerators. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-3-540-29306-4.

[15] See David J. Griffiths (1999). "4.2.2". Introduction to Electrodynamics (third ed.). Prentice Hall. for a good description of how $P$ relates to the bound charge.

[16] See David J. Griffiths (1999). "6.2.2". Introduction to Electrodynamics (third ed.). Prentice Hall. for a good description of how $M$ relates to the bound current.

[Zangwill2013-17] 1 2 3 4 Andrew Zangwill (2013). Modern Electrodynamics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-89697-9.

[Kittel2005-18] 1 2 3 Kittel, Charles (2005), Introduction to Solid State Physics (8th ed.), USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ISBN 978-0-471-41526-8

[19] P.M. Jack (2003). "Physical Space as a Quaternion Structure I: Maxwell Equations. A Brief Note". Toronto, Canada. arXiv:math-ph/0307038. Bibcode:2003math.ph...7038J.

[20] A. Waser (2000). "On the Notation of Maxwell's Field Equations" (PDF). AW-Verlag.

[Monk-21] 1 2 Peter Monk (2003). Finite Element Methods for Maxwell's Equations. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. p. 1 ff. ISBN 0-19-850888-3.

[Volakis-22] Thomas B. A. Senior & John Leonidas Volakis (1995-03-01). Approximate Boundary Conditions in Electromagnetics. London UK: Institution of Electrical Engineers. p. 261 ff. ISBN 0-85296-849-3.

[Hagstrom-23] 1 2 T Hagstrom (Björn Engquist & Gregory A. Kriegsmann, Eds.) (1997). Computational Wave Propagation. Berlin: Springer. p. 1 ff. ISBN 0-387-94874-0.

[Hussain-24] Henning F. Harmuth & Malek G. M. Hussain (1994). Propagation of Electromagnetic Signals. Singapore: World Scientific. p. 17. ISBN 981-02-1689-0.

[Cook-25] David M Cook (2002). The Theory of the Electromagnetic Field. Mineola NY: Courier Dover Publications. p. 335 ff. ISBN 0-486-42567-3.

[Lourtioz-26] Jean-Michel Lourtioz (2005-05-23). Photonic Crystals: Towards Nanoscale Photonic Devices. Berlin: Springer. p. 84. ISBN 3-540-24431-X.

[27] S. G. Johnson, Notes on Perfectly Matched Layers, online MIT course notes (Aug. 2007).

[28] S. F. Mahmoud (1991). Electromagnetic Waveguides: Theory and Applications. London UK: Institution of Electrical Engineers. Chapter 2. ISBN 0-86341-232-7.

[Kempel-29] John Leonidas Volakis, Arindam Chatterjee & Leo C. Kempel (1998). Finite element method for electromagnetics : antennas, microwave circuits, and scattering applications. New York: Wiley IEEE. p. 79 ff. ISBN 0-7803-3425-6.

[Friedman-30] Bernard Friedman (1990). Principles and Techniques of Applied Mathematics. Mineola NY: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-66444-9.

[Taflove-31] Taflove A & Hagness S C (2005). Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-difference Time-domain Method. Boston MA: Artech House. Chapters 6 & 7. ISBN 1-58053-832-0.

[32] H Freistühler & G Warnecke (2001). Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications. p. 605.

[33] J Rosen. "Redundancy and superfluity for electromagnetic fields and potentials". American Journal of Physics. 48 (12): 1071. Bibcode:1980AmJPh..48.1071R. doi:10.1119/1.12289.

[34] J. A. Stratton (1941). Electromagnetic Theory. McGraw-Hill Book Company. pp. 1–6.

[35] B Jiang & J Wu & L. A. Povinelli (1996). "The Origin of Spurious Solutions in Computational Electromagnetics". Journal of Computational Physics. 125 (1): 104. Bibcode:1996JCoPh.125..104J. doi:10.1006/jcph.1996.0082.

[36] Weinberg, Steven (1972). Gravitation and Cosmology. John Wiley. ISBN 0-471-92567-5.

[37] Liu, Changli. "Explanation on Overdetermination of Maxwell's Equations". arXiv:1002.0892.

[38] Arminjon, Mayeul (2018). "On the equations of electrodynamics in a flat or curved spacetime and a possible interaction energy". Open Physics. 16 (1): 488. doi:10.1515/phys-2018-0065.

Maxwell's equations

Conceptual descriptions

Gauss's law

Gauss's law for magnetism

Faraday's law

Ampère's law with Maxwell's addition

Formulation in terms of electric and magnetic fields (microscopic or in vacuum version)

Formulation in SI units convention

Formulation in Gaussian units convention

Key to the notation

Differential equations

Integral equations

Relationship between differential and integral formulations

Flux and divergence

Circulation and curl

Charge conservation

Vacuum equations, electromagnetic waves and speed of light

Macroscopic formulation

Bound charge and current

Auxiliary fields, polarization and magnetization

Constitutive relations

Alternative formulations

Relativistic formulations

Solutions

Overdetermination of Maxwell's equations

Maxwell equations as the classical limit of QED

Variations

Magnetic monopoles

See also

Notes

References

Historical publications

Further reading

External links

Modern treatments

Other