List of High Court of Australia cases

This is a chronological list of significant cases decided by the High Court of Australia.

The Griffith Court: 1903–1919

The Knox Court: 1919–1930

  • Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co. Ltd. (Engineers' Case) (1920): Rejected the doctrines of implied intergovernmental immunities and reserved State powers and determined that each head of federal power should be interpreted simply on the words of the grant.
  • R v Licensing Court of Brisbane; Ex parte Daniell (1920): Inconsistency between Commonwealth and State legislation, which is dealt with by s109 of the Australian Constitution.
  • Re Judiciary and Navigation Acts (1921): dealt with what is a matter for the court and what the court can hear.
  • Roche v Kronheimer (1921): Concluded that Federal Parliament had the power to implement the Treaty of Versailles under the defence power. One view was also under the external affair power.
  • Melbourne Corporation v Barry [1922] HCA 56, (1922) 31 CLR 174: early civil liberties case, striking down a municipal attempt to regulate street marches.
  • Pirrie v McFarlane (1925): crown immunity case.
  • British Imperial Oil Co Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1925] HCA 4, (1925) 35 CLR 422: a power of appeal against an income tax assessment was part of the Judicial power of the Commonwealth.
  • Burwood Cinema Ltd v Australian Theatrical and Amusement Employees' Association [1925] HCA 7, (1925) 35 CLR 528: unions are not just agents for their members but can be a party in their own right to an industrial dispute and award.
  • Clyde Engineering Co Ltd v Cowburn (1926): Isaacs J established the 'cover the field' test for inconsistency between a Commonwealth and a State law
  • R v Clarke (1927): no contract was formed because the offer of a reward was not accepted by Clarke because he did not act to claim the reward, instead he gave information that led to the conviction of a murderer to clear himself of a charge of accessory to that murder.
  • Federated State School Teachers' Association of Australia v Victoria (Schoolteachers case) [1929] HCA 11, (1929) 41 CLR 569: a state school teacher was not engaged in an industry and so could not be covered by a federal award.
  • Caledonian Collieries Ltd v Australasian Coal & Shale Employees' Federation (No 1) [1930] HCA 1, (1930) 42 CLR 527 and (No 2) [1930] HCA 2, (1930) 42 CLR 558: held that attempts to arbitrate a management lockout in Hunter Valley coalmines were invalid as the dispute did not "extend beyond the limits of any one State".

The Isaacs Court: 1930-1931

The Gavan Duffy Court 1931–1935

The Latham Court: 1935–1952

The Dixon Court: 1952–1964

The Barwick Court: 1964–1981

The Gibbs Court: 1981–1987

The Mason Court: 1987–1995

The Brennan Court: 1995–1998

The Gleeson Court: 1998 – 2008

The French Court: 2008 – 2016

  • Cesan v The Queen (2008): there was a miscarriage of justice in the conviction of two men for drug trafficking where the trial judge was asleep during parts of the trial.
  • Pape v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (2009): the Rudd government's tax bonuses were constitutionally valid.
  • Lane v Morrison [2009] HCA 29, (2009) 239 CLR 230 The Australian Military Court was an invalid attempt to exercise the judicial power of the Commonwealth because its members did not enjoy the tenure required by s 72 of the Constitution.
  • Kirk v Industrial Court of NSW [2010] HCA 1, (2010) 239 CLR 531 State Parliaments cannot prevent State Supreme Courts from issuing prerogative relief for jurisdictional error.
  • South Australia v Totani (2010): South Australian Bikie laws and freedom of association case: A State could not validly impair one of the defining characteristics of a court.
  • Rowe v Electoral Commissioner (2010): Commonwealth legislation invalidly sought to restrict the time in which a person may seek to enroll in an election or alter their enrollment details after the writs for 2010 Australian Federal election had been issued.
  • Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) a matter on which reasonable minds might differ was not unreasonable or illogical.
  • MRR v GR (2010) whether it was in the best interests of the child to live in a caravan park in Mount Isa.
  • Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth (2010) The minister was required to afford procedural fairness to applicants for refugee status who were assessed as part of an "offshore processing regime"
  • Telstra Corporation Ltd v Commonwealth (2010) the operation of the access regime to the copper telecommunications network did not result in an acquisition of property on unjust terms
  • Plaintiff M70/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2011) The Malaysia Solution case: refugees can not be deported to nations which are not legally bound to ensure various safeties for those refugees.
  • Wainohu v New South Wales [2011] HCA 24, (2011) 243 CLR 181 Non-judicial functions conferred upon judges of the Supreme Court of NSW were incompatible with institutional integrity of the Court
  • Haskins v The Commonwealth [2011] HCA 28, (2011) 244 CLR 22 the Military Justice (Interim Measures) Act was a valid exercise of the defence power and provided lawful authority justifying the detention of the plaintiff.
  • JT International SA v Commonwealth [2012] HCA 43, (2011) 250 CLR 1 rejected the Tobacco companies challenge to the Commonwealth's plain tobacco packaging laws, claiming their trademark property had been illegally acquired without compensation.
  • Wotton v Queensland (2012): a gag order applying to all prisoners and parolees was a legitimate burden on freedom of political communication.
  • Williams v Commonwealth (2012): School Chaplins case: The funding for school chaplins was not a valid use of prerogative powers for the executive under s61 of the constitution.
  • Bendigo Regional Institute of TAFE v Barclay [2012] HCA 32, (2012) 248 CLR 500 held the employer did not act for a prohibited reason when it suspended a union delegate over an inflammatory email.
  • Betfair Pty Limited v Racing New South Wales [2012] HCA 12, (2012) 249 CLR 217 a fee to access race field information had no discriminatory or protectionist effect on interstate trade and did not infringe s 92 of the Constitution.
  • Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd (2013) A casino did not owe a duty of care to gamblers.
  • Monis v The Queen (2013) a split decision on whether the implied freedom of political communication protected the sending of offensive messages by post.
  • Akiba v Commonwealth (2013) held that native title rights at sea were not extinguished by legislation for fishing licences and third party rights of a personal character dependent upon status were not rights in relation to the waters.
  • Commonwealth v ACT (Same-sex marriage case) (2014): The Marriage Equality Act 2013 (ACT) was invalid as inconsistent with the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth)
  • Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker (2014): there is no implied term in contracts of employment in Australia imposing a mutual duty of trust and confidence.
  • Williams v Commonwealth (No 2) (2014) : 2nd School Chaplins case: The legislation for funding for school chaplins was invalid as it extended beyond the scope of Parliament's power under the Constitution.
  • CFMEU v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 32, (2014) 253 CLR 500 held the employer did not act for a prohibited reason when it dismissed a union member who held up a scab sign during a union protest.
  • Queensland v Congoo (2015) [2015] HCA 17 split decision on whether a temporary military occupation of the Bar Barrum people’s land during World War Two permanently extinguished their native title
  • D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc (2015) [2015] HCA 35: human genes are not a 'patentable invention' for the purposes of the Patents Act 1900 (Cth).
  • Attwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Ltd [2016] HCA 16: held that advice given by an advocate out of court that led to consent orders made by the court was not subject to the advocate's immunity from suit.
  • Day v Australian Electoral Officer for SA [2016] HCA 20 upheld the 2016 Senate voting changes as both above the line and below the line voting were constitutionally valid methods for the people to choose their Senators.
  • Murphy v Electoral Commissioner [2016] HCA 36 held that closing the electoral rolls 7 days after the issuing of writs was not a burden on the requirement that members of Parliament be directly chosen by the people.
  • Cunningham v Commonwealth [2016] HCA 39 changes to the retiring allowances and life Gold Pass for retired members of Parliament were not an acquisition of property otherwise than on just terms.

The Kiefel Court: 2017–present

  • Re Culleton (No 2) (2017): Rod Culleton was incapable of being chosen as a senator as he was subjected to be sentenced at the time of his election, despite the conviction subsequently being annulled.
  • Re Day (No 2) (2017): Bob Day was disqualified from sitting as a senator as he had an interest in an agreement with the crown.
  • Wilkie v Commonwealth (2017) expenditure for the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey had been approved by Parliament and was the collection of "statistical information" that could be conducted by the ABS.
  • Brown v Tasmania (2017): provisions of the Tasmanian Protestors Act were unconstitutional since they excessively burdened the implied constitutional right of political communication.
  • Re Canavan, the Citizenship seven case (2017): followed Sykes v Cleary holding that the fact of dual citizenship was disqualifying, regardless of whether the person knew of the citizenship or took any voluntary act.
  • Re Nash (No 2) [2017] HCA 52: the words "incapable of being chosen" refer to a process of being chosen that does not end on polling day; the process continues until such time as the result of the election is declared which, in the case of a vacancy arising under s 44 of the Constitution, cannot be until the places elected are filled by the qualified candidates.
  • Alley v Gillespie [2018] HCA 11: section 46 of the Constitution and the displacing legislation cannot be read as conferring on the High Court the power to determine the eligibility of a member of parliament; that power is conferred on the relevant House of Parliament or the Court of Disputed Returns acting pursuant to a referral under the Commonwealth Electoral Act.

See also

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.