Homeguard Products (New Zealand) Ltd v Kiwi Packaging Ltd

Homeguard Products (New Zealand) Ltd v Kiwi Packaging Ltd
Court High Court of New Zealand
Full case name Homeguard Products (New Zealand) Limited v Kiwi Packaging Limited
Decided 1981
Citation(s) [1981] 2 NZLR 322
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Barker J
Keywords
accord & satisfaction

Homeguard Products (New Zealand) Ltd v Kiwi Packaging Ltd [1981] 2 NZLR 322 is often cited regarding the banking of cheques tendered as full settlement of disputed accounts.[1][2]

Background

Kiwi Packaging supplied Homeguard with packaging materials. For unexplained reasons, a dispute arose between the parties just what the final balance owing was. This was not helped by Kiwi packaging giving different amounts as the final balance, ranging from $901.84 to $1,187.60.

Homeguard thought the balance was even less than these amounts, with their calculation being for $765.97, and as a consequence, sent Kiwi Packaging a cheque for $765.97 with a note attached saying this amount was tendered "in full settlement of our account".

Kiwi Packaging, despite banking the cheque, sued Homeguard for the balance of $136 in the District Court, and won judgment for the balance remaining. Homeguard appealed to the High Court.

Decision

By banking the debtor’s cheque, Kiwi Packaging in effect consented to the terms attached to the cheque. Accordingly, the judge ruled that accord and satisfaction occurred, resulting in the debt being legally extinguished upon the creditor's banking of the cheque. Barker J said:

The court was silent on just how long "promptly" might mean.

References

  1. Gerbic, Philippa; Lawrence, Martin (2003). Understanding Commercial Law (5th ed.). LexisNexis. ISBN 0-408-71714-9.
  2. Walker, Campbell (2004). Butterworths Student Companion Contract (4th ed.). LexisNexis. p. 55. ISBN 0-408-71770-X.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.