1984 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada

The list below consists of the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1984. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.

Reasons

Delivered the Court's reason	Joined the Court's reason	Filed a concurrence	Joined a concurrence
Filed a dissent	Joined a dissent	Filed a concurrence/dissent	Joined a concurrence/dissent
Did not participate in the judgment	Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering
Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's reason are per coram. Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices occasionally join multiple reasons in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly. Multiple unnumbered reasons are jointly written or delivered. Decisions that are given orally from the bench are denoted by a "V"; per coram decisions delivered orally from the bench only note a "V" on the most senior justice on the panel. An asterisk ( * ) in the Court's opinion denotes that it was only a majority in part or a plurality.

Case name	Argued	Decided	Laskin	Dickson	Ritchie	Beetz	Estey	McIntyre	Chouinard	Lamer	Wilson	Le Dain
Beaudoin-Daigneault v. Richard, [1984] 1 SCR 2		February 2, 1984
Parrot v. Thompson et al., [1984] 1 SCR 57		February 2, 1984
Desgagné v. Fabrique de la paroisse St-Philippe d'Arvida, [1984] 1 SCR 19		February 2, 1984
R. v. Isaac, [1984] 1 SCR 74		February 2, 1984
Telecommunications Workers' Union v. British Columbia Ferry Corporation, [1984] 1 SCR 83		February 13, 1984
McKibbon v. R., [1984] 1 SCR 131		March 8, 1984
Reference re Newfoundland Continental Shelf, [1984] 1 SCR 86		March 8, 1984
Droste v. R., [1984] 1 SCR 208		April 2, 1984
The Queen v. Ancio, [1984] 1 SCR 225		April 2, 1984
Bibeault v. McCaffrey, [1984] 1 SCR 176		April 2, 1984
Brown v. Baugh et al., [1984] 1 SCR 192		April 2, 1984
National Bank of Canada v. Retail Clerks' International Union et al., [1984] 1 SCR 269		May 3, 1984
Law society of Upper Canada v. Skapinker, [1984] 1 SCR 357		May 3, 1984
Reference re Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act, [1984] 1 SCR 297		May 3, 1984
R. v. Garlow, [1984] 1 SCR 386		May 3, 1984
Chiasson v. The Queen, [1984] 1 SCR 266		May 3, 1984
Hartel Holdings Co. Ltd. v. City of Calgary, [1984] 1 SCR 337		May 3, 1984
Farr v. Farr, [1984] 1 SCR 252		May 3, 1984
Kane v. R., [1984] 1 SCR 387		May 14, 1984
Reference re: Ownership of the Bed of the Strait of Georgia and Related Areas, [1984] 1 SCR 388		May 17, 1984
Canadian Merchant Service Guild v. Gagnon et al., [1984] 1 SCR 509		June 7, 1984
Stubart Investments Ltd. v. The Queen, [1984] 1 SCR 536		June 7, 1984
Langlois v. Ministère de la Justice du Québec, [1984] 1 SCR 472		June 7, 1984
R. v. Wis Development Corporation Ltd. et al., [1984] 1 SCR 485		June 7, 1984
Smith v. The Queen, [1984] 1 SCR 582		June 7, 1984
James Richardson & Sons v. M.N.R., [1984] 1 SCR 614		June 21, 1984
Consumers Distributing Co. v. Seiko, [1984] 1 SCR 583		June 21, 1984
Kamloops v. Nielsen, [1984] 2 SCR 2		July 26, 1984
Skogman v. The Queen, [1984] 2 SCR 93		July 26, 1984
A.G. (Que.) v. Quebec Protestant School Boards, [1984] 2 SCR 66		July 26, 1984
Khan v. R., [1984] 2 SCR 62		July 26, 1984
Gould v. Attorney General of Canada, [1984] 2 SCR 124		September 4, 1984
Hunter et al. v. Southam Inc., [1984] 2 SCR 145		September 17, 1984
Royal Bank of Canada v. First Pioneer Investments, [1984] 2 SCR 125		September 17, 1984
Maroukis v. Maroukis, [1984] 2 SCR 137		September 17, 1984
Ogg-Moss v. R., [1984] 2 SCR 173		September 17, 1984
Nixon v. R., [1984] 2 SCR 197		September 17, 1984
Phoenix Assurance v. Bird Construction, [1984] 2 SCR 199		September 17, 1984
Perka v. The Queen, [1984] 2 SCR 232		October 11, 1984
Ken Gordon Excavating v. Edstan Construction, [1984] 2 SCR 280		October 11, 1984
Miller v. Miller, [1984] 2 SCR 310		October 11, 1984
Wildman v. R., [1984] 2 SCR 311		October 11, 1984
R. v. Brese, [1984] 2 SCR 333		October 31, 1984
Guerin v. The Queen, [1984] 2 SCR 335		November 1, 1984
Reilly v. R., [1984] 2 SCR 396		November 1, 1984
Osborne v. The Queen, [1984] 2 SCR 406		November 1, 1984
Syndicat des employés de production du Québec v. CLRB, [1984] 2 SCR 412		November 22, 1984
Blanchard v. Control Data Canada Ltd., [1984] 2 SCR 476		November 22, 1984
Cardinal v. The Queen, [1984] 2 SCR 523		November 22, 1984
Radulesco v. Canadian Human Rights Commission, [1984] 2 SCR 407		November 22, 1984
British Columbia Development Corporation v. Friedmann (Ombudsman), [1984] 2 SCR 447		November 22, 1984
Attorney General of Quebec v. Udeco Inc. et al., [1984] 2 SCR 502		November 22, 1984
R. v. Sophonow, [1984] 2 SCR 524		December 10, 1984
Goldwax v. Montréal (City of), [1984] 2 SCR 525		December 12, 1984
Nadeau v. The Queen, [1984] 2 SCR 570		December 13, 1984
Abbas v. R, [1984] 2 SCR 526		December 13, 1984
Attorney General (Ontario) v. Fatehi, [1984] 2 SCR 536		December 13, 1984
Duhamel v. The Queen, [1984] 2 SCR 555		December 13, 1984
Minister of Employment and Immigration et al. v. Jiminez-Perez et al., [1984] 2 SCR 565		December 13, 1984
A.G. (Que.) v. Greater Hull School Board, [1984] 2 SCR 575		December 20, 1984
Lyons v. The Queen, [1984] 2 SCR 633		December 20, 1984
Wiretap Reference, [1984] 2 SCR 697		December 20, 1984
Caldwell et al. v. Stuart et al., [1984] 2 SCR 603		December 20, 1984

References

1984 decisions: CanLII

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.