< Riemann Hypothesis
Theorem 1
Proof

Consider the functional equation for Zeta,

Notice that for , the sine term evaluates to which evaluates to 0 for all integers , hence for all natural .

Definition 1

These zeroes are referred to as trivial zeroes. As a set,

Zeroes that do not lie in this set are to be referred to as non-trivial zeroes.

Note 1

The above argument cannot be applied to , as is a simple pole (), as are negative arguments of ().

Theorem 2

All non-trivial zeroes of have a real part that lies in the interval

Theorem 3

Take the inequality,

Using the definition of deduced in an earlier chapter,

Taking the log of both sides, using

Writing as a power series,

Substituting ,

Taking the modulus of the argument,

Substituting appropriate values,

If one lets , it should become apparent that,

Clearly implying,

Exponentiating both sides,

Let's assume that has a zero at , then,

As gives a pole, and gives a zero, contradicting the previously stated inequality, proving theorem 3 by contradiction .

Theorem 4

Using the functional equation,

By theorem 3, the RHS is non-zero, hence as is the LHS.

Theorems 3 and 4 are sufficient to imply theorem 2.

The conjecture

Riemann, knowing that all zeroes lied in the critical strip, postulated,

Conjecture

All non-trivial zeroes of have a real part of

The above conjecture is considered to be the most notable in pure mathematics, and the most notable of Riemann's works.

This article is issued from Wikibooks. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.