Introduction
Contracts
Fact Summary
Outline
Torts
Fact Summary
Outline
a. Paul (P) v. Charlie (C) NEGLIGENCE DUTY BREACH OF DUTY CAUSATION Actual Cause Proximate Cause DAMAGES DEFENSES Contributory Negligence Comparative Negligence Assumption of Risk b. PAUL (P) v. KIDDIERIDES-R-US (K) PRODUCTS LIABILITY STRICT LIABILITY i) the defendant is a commercial supplier (manufacturer, distributor, wholesaler, retailer, and similar parties in the commercial supply chain of the product). A casual seller would not suffice; ii) the product is defective when it left the control of the defendant; iii) the product was not expected to and in fact did not experience substantial alteration; iv) no privity (contractual relationship) is required; the defendant is liable for the buyer, user, and bystander who suffered injury caused by the defect; v) the defendant is expected to anticipate foreseeable misuse by the product’s user. Defective Product Damages Discussed supra (P v. C) Defenses Contributory negligence NEGLIGENCE BREACH OF WARRANTY AND MISREPRESENTATION express warranty implied warranty of merchantability (suitable for the ordinary purpose of its use), or when misrepresentation
Criminal Law
Fact Summary
Outline
P v. D assault battery
State v. D1
- Solicitation to commit robbery
- merged with target crime
- Conspiracy to commit robbery
- Wharton Rule
- Aggravated Assault
- merged with target crime
- Aggravated Battery
- merged with target crime
- Attempted murder
State v. D2
- Conspiracy to commit robbery
- Pinkerton Rule
- Wharton Rule
- Accomplice liability
- Robbery
- Aggravated Assault
- merged with target crime
- Aggravated Battery
- merged with target crime
- Attempted murder
State v. D3
- Conspiracy to commit robbery
- Pinkerton Rule
- Wharton Rule
- Accomplice liability
- Aggravated Assault
- merged with target crime
- Aggravated Battery
- merged with target crime
- Attempted murder
- Defenses
- voluntary intoxication
- duress